Women with complex health needs are more at risk of having children’s social care involvement with their newborns than other mothers. Around the time of pregnancy, there are opportunities for health services to support women with these needs and mitigate the risk of mother–baby separation. Yet little is known about healthcare professionals’ experiences of providing this support.

We administered an online survey to perinatal healthcare professionals across England (n=70 responders), including midwives, obstetricians, perinatal psychologists/psychiatrists and health visitors. We asked about their experiences of providing care for pregnant women with chronic physical conditions, mental health needs, intellectual/developmental disabilities and substance use disorders, who might be at risk of children’s social care involvement. We conducted a framework analysis.

We constructed five themes from participant data. These include (1) inaccessible healthcare for women with complex needs, (2) the challenges and importance of restoring trust, (3) services focusing on individuals, not families, (4) the necessity and caution around multidisciplinary support and (5) underfunded services inhibiting good practice.

Women who are at risk of children’s social care involvement will likely experience perinatal healthcare inequities. Our findings suggest that current perinatal healthcare provision for this population is inadequate and national guidelines need updated to inform support.

Approximately 17.5% of couples of reproductive age have experienced infertility. Women with a poor ovarian response (POR) must undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and embryo transfer to achieve pregnancy. However, studies have reported a poor response to gonadotropin stimulation in women undergoing IVF-ET. Results from animal experiments suggest that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has a curative effect by protecting ovarian function, reducing follicle loss and delaying premature ovarian failure in rats caused by chemotherapy. Clinical studies on the therapeutic effect of G-CSF are deficient; therefore, this study will investigate its ability to improve ovum quality and maturity among women with POR undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

This clinical, multicentre, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial will employ balanced randomisation (1:1). The planned sample size is 312 participants (156 subjects in each group). A total of 312 patients with infertility undergoing IVF/ICSI will be recruited from four public hospitals in China. The participants will be randomly divided into an experimental group (G-CSF) and a placebo group (control). All patients will be treated by using the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation superovulation protocol. The primary outcome will be D3 embryo quality. The number of ova obtained, MII ova and transferable embryos will be inclusive in the secondary outcome.

To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to investigate the effect of G-CSF treatment timing and stimulation protocol in patients with POR in China. This study will provide new information about G-CSF efficacy among patients with POR undergoing IVF/ICSI and can help improve ovum quality and maturity. Clinical trials on this subject are deficient in China; therefore, a well-designed randomised trial is needed to determine the ability of G-CSF to improve ovum quality and maturity to facilitate conception among women with POR treated with IVF/ICSI.

ChiCTR2200062412.

The study summarises the selection prescreen criteria currently used in the UK for a uterus transplant and highlights the number of women who are suitable to proceed.

To assess the demographics, motivations, reasons and suitability among women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) to undergo uterine transplantation (UTx).

A cross-sectional survey.

An electronic questionnaire was sent via email to women with AUFI who had previously been referred to the UTx research team or approached the Womb Transplant UK Charity. The questions assessed suitability to undergo UTx based on demographic information, perceptions to adoption and surrogacy and reasons why UTx was preferable. Responses were assessed against the study selection criteria.

Women with AUFI.

210 women completed the questionnaire. The most common aetiology of AUFI in our cohort was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (68%; n=143) whereas 29% (n=62) had previously undergone hysterectomy. 63% (n=132) of the cohort had previously considered adoption, 5% (n=11) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully adopted. The most common reason cited to undergo UTx over adoption was to experience gestation (n=63; 53%), while 37% (n=44) wanted a biologically related child. 76% (n=160) of participants had previously considered surrogacy, 22 (10%) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully become mothers using a surrogate. The most common reason to undergo UTx over surrogacy was to experience gestation (n=77; 54%). 15% (n=21) were concerned about the legal implications, 14% (n=20) identified the financial cost as a barrier and 8% (n=12) could not consider it due to religious reasons. On adhering to the selection criteria, 65 (31%) women were suitable to proceed with the trial.

The study demonstrates that implementing commonly used selection criteria for a UTx led to an attrition rate of more than two-thirds of women who requested to initially undergo the process. As more studies present outcomes following UTx, critical assessment of the selection criteria currently used is warranted to ensure potential recipients are not being unnecessarily excluded.

NCT02388802.