Conectar
To explore trial participants’ experience of long-term catheters (LTC), the acceptability of washout policies, their experience of the CATHETER II trial (a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters) and their satisfaction with the outcomes. The objectives of the healthcare professionals (HCPs) focus group and interview were to explore their attitudes towards weekly prophylactic catheter washout, views on the provision of training and participants’ ability to enact washout behaviours.
A longitudinal qualitative study embedded within the CATHETER II randomised controlled trial, which included semi-structured interviews and focus groups with participants from multiple trial sites. Data were analysed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and Theoretical Domains Framework. This UK community-based study included 50 (24 female, 26 male) CATHETER II trial participants, aged between 23 and 100 years, with LTC and able to self-manage the washout and study documentation either independently or with the help of a carer. Seven HCPs (five female, two male) also participated.
The participants had positive attitudes towards weekly prophylactic saline or acidic catheter washouts and other trial elements, such as washout training, catheter calendar and monthly phone calls. Participants and HCPs found the ‘ask’ of the CATHETER II trial and the weekly self-administered prophylactic washout policies to be feasible. The participants reported that the catheter washout training provided during the trial enhanced their self-efficacy, skills and self-reported capability to carry out the washouts. Participants reported having positive outcomes from the weekly washout. These included reduced blockage, pain or infection, reduced need for HCP support and greater psychological reassurance. HCPs attested to the participants’ understanding of and adherence to the weekly washouts and other elements of the trial.
This study shows acceptability, feasibility and self-reported fidelity of the CATHETER II trial on a behavioural level. Self-management for prophylactic catheter washouts is both feasible and, following training, achievable without any need for additional support.
To synthesise the effectiveness of massage therapy for cancer pain, quality of life and anxiety among patients with cancer.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
This review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the effects of massage therapy on cancer pain, quality of life or anxiety in patients with cancer pain were eligible. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation were used to assess the quality of studies. Outcomes were pooled using standardised mean differences and narratively synthesised when meta-analysis was not possible.
Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations were searched for English peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published from inception to 8 January 2024.
Thirty-six RCTs involving 3671 participants were included. Massage therapy significantly improved pain (pooled SMD = −0.51, 95% CI −0.68 to −0.33), quality of life (pooled SMD = 0.48, 95% CI 0.19–0.78 when higher scores indicate better quality of life; pooled SMD = −0.52, 95% CI −0.88 to −0.16 when higher scores indicate poorer quality of life) and anxiety (pooled SMD = −0.38, 95% CI: −0.57 to −0.18) post-intervention. All outcomes had very low certainty of evidence. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias.
This review found that massage therapy is beneficial to patients with cancer in improving pain, quality of life and anxiety. Healthcare institutions and healthcare professionals should recognise the value of massage therapy to enhance the care of patients with cancer pain.
PRISMA guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
PROSPERO CRD42023407311.
FreshRSS 