Conectar
Smoking and vaping are especially prevalent among people with experience of psychosis (EoP), potentially increasing their toxicant exposure. Switching from tobacco smoking to vaping e-cigarettes reduces exposure to tobacco-related toxicants and likely associated diseases. We compared levels of nicotine and tobacco-related toxicant exposure among people with versus without EoP.
Cross-sectional study, secondary data analysis of Wave 5 (2018) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.
Data collection took place in the USA at the home of participants.
Data were from 5750 adults (aged >18 years) with and without EoP who smoked, vaped, did both or did neither. EoP was defined as ever being told by a health professional that you have schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, a psychotic illness or psychotic episode.
Levels of urinary toxicants: nicotine metabolites, metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) among people with and without EoP. Analyses were adjusted for demographics, cannabis use and past 30-day smoking/vaping status, and were repeated after stratifying by smoking /vaping status.
Of the 5750 participants, 6.3% (n=361) reported EoP, and 93.7% reported no EoP. Levels of nicotine and TSNA metabolites, cadmium, uranium and some VOCs were significantly higher among participants with EoP compared with those without. However, when smoking, vaping and cannabis use were taken into account, the associations of EoP with nicotine and TSNA metabolites, and most of the VOCs, were attenuated and no longer significant.
Participants with EoP are exposed to more nicotine and tobacco-related toxicants than those without EoP, likely largely due to the high prevalence of smoking, vaping and cannabis use among this population.
Thanks to the introduction of recent national guidelines for treating herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis, health outcomes have improved. This paper evaluates the health system costs and the health-related quality of life implications of these guidelines.
A sub-analysis of data from a prospective, multi-centre, observational cohort ENCEPH-UK study conducted across 29 hospitals in the UK from 2012 to 2015.
Data for patients aged ≥16 years with a confirmed HSV encephalitis diagnosis admitted for treatment with aciclovir were collected at discharge, 3 and 12 months.
Patient health outcomes were measured by the Glasgow outcome score (GOS), modified ranking score (mRS) and the EuroQoL; healthcare costs were estimated per patient at discharge from hospital and at 12 months follow-up. In addition, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were calculated from the EQ-5D utility scores. Cost–utility analysis was performed using the NHS and Social Care perspective.
A total of 49 patients were included; 35 were treated within 48 hours, ‘early’ (median (IQR) 8.25 [3.7–20.5]) and 14 were treated after 48 hours ‘delayed’ (median (IQR) 93.9 [66.7–100.1]). At discharge, 30 (86%) in the early treatment group had a good mRS outcome score (0–3) compared with 4 (29%) in the delayed group. According to GOS, 10 (29%) had a good recovery in the early treatment group, but only 1 (7%) in the delayed group. EQ-5D-3L utility value at discharge was significantly higher for early treatment (0.609 vs 0.221, p
This study suggests that early treatment may be associated with better health outcomes and reduced patient healthcare costs, with a potential for savings to the NHS with faster treatment.
To explore how primary care practitioners, including nurses, provide dietary diabetes management to migrants.
The scoping review followed, a refined and structured methodological framework and adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review guidelines.
Searches were conducted across CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases to identify studies published between 2000 and 2024 that focus on dietary diabetes care for migrants in Primary Health Care settings. Data were synthesised using thematic analysis.
The search identified 377 studies, with 30 meeting the inclusion criteria. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) cultural influences on diabetes management, (2) culturally tailored dietary interventions, (3) communication challenges and (4) access and availability of diabetes care.
Culturally competent primary care practices are crucial for effective diabetes dietary management for migrants, as they can enhance patient engagement, adherence, and overall health outcomes. Primary care nurses are uniquely positioned to address the barriers experienced by migrant populations through tailored care delivery.
The findings provide actionable guidance for nurses to implement targeted and culturally responsive approaches in delivering dietary diabetes management, aiming to improve patient adherence and health outcomes among migrants.
This review identified significant literature gaps in how primary care nurses provide culturally responsive dietary guidance for migrant patients with diabetes. The four themes identified have emphasised the need for culturally preserving care to enhance patient engagement and adherence to clinical guidance. The findings will directly impact nursing practice, education, and clinical guidelines globally, enabling nurses to deliver more effective and culturally responsive diabetes care that improves diabetes-related disparities among migrants globally.
The review adhered to PRISMA-Sc guidelines.
No patient or public contribution. This review received no funding from public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
To evaluate inhaler sustainability in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmomary Disease (COPD) by analysing how inhaler design typology, prescribing and usage patterns, disposal and recycling practices influence human health and environmental outcomes, using a People-Process-Product (PPP) framework to identify actionable opportunities for improvement.
A systematic review was conducted in May 2024, with reporting structured around the PPP framework using narrative synthesis.
MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and relevant grey literature were searched for publications over the period from April 2014 to April 2024.
Studies were included if published between 2014 and 2024, involved patients with asthma or COPD and healthcare professionals and specifically examined aspects of inhaler sustainability, including patient behaviours, healthcare provider prescribing practices and environmental impacts.
Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from 63 studies. Due to diverse methodologies, quality assessment focused on research design robustness, completeness of outcome reporting and potential biases. Findings were synthesised narratively to address each research question using the PPP framework.
33% of included studies focused on two or more domains of the PPP framework as both primary and/or secondary outcomes. Studies mapped to the ‘People’ domain (n=34) showed limited awareness among patients and clinicians regarding the environmental impact of inhaler prescription patterns, use patterns and disposal methods, with over 75% of patients discarding inhalers in household waste. In the ‘Process’ domain (n=11), switching from pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) to dry powder inhalers (DPIs) or soft mist inhalers (SMIs) was associated with improved inhaler adherence and asthma control, though uptake of new inhalers was influenced by patients’ prior experience, competence, proficiency and perceived usability. The ‘Product’ domain (n=41) showed that DPIs and SMIs consistently had lower carbon footprints than pMDIs, with short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) pMDIs having the highest emissions due to prescription, use patterns and disposal.
Improving patient education on sustainable inhaler use and disposal and providing healthcare professionals with focused training on low-carbon prescribing are critical steps towards achieving significant clinical benefits and supporting environmental sustainability in asthma and COPD management.
CRD42024541927.
While survival rates following neonatal surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) have improved over the years, neurodevelopmental delays are still highly prevalent in these patients. After correcting for the CHD subtype, the severity of developmental impairment is dependent on multiple factors, including intraoperative brain injury, which is more frequent and more severe in those undergoing aortic arch repair with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). It is proposed that brain injury may be reduced if cooling is stopped at the point of electrocerebral inactivity (ECI) on electroencephalogram (EEG), but there is limited evidence to support this as few centres perform perioperative EEG routinely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of EEG monitoring during neonatal aortic arch repair and investigate the relationship between temperature and EEG to inform the design of a future clinical trial.
Single-centre prospective observational cohort study in a UK specialist children’s hospital, aiming to recruit 74 neonates (≤4 weeks corrected age) undergoing aortic arch repair with DHCA. EEG will be acquired at least 1–3 hours before surgery, and brain activity will be monitored continuously until 24 hours following admission to intensive care. Demographic, clinical, surgical and outcome variables will be collected. Feasibility will be measured by the number of patients recruited, data collection procedures, technically successful EEG recordings and adverse events. The main outcomes are the temperature at which ECI is achieved and its duration, EEG patterns at key perioperative steps and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months postsurgery.
The study was approved by the Yorkshire and The Humber Sheffield National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (20/YH/0192) on 18 June 2020. Written informed consent will be obtained from the participant’s parent/guardian prior to surgery. Findings will be disseminated to the academic community through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at conferences. Parents/guardians will be informed of the results through a newsletter in conjunction with local charities.
To explore the experiences of new graduate registered nurses in caring for the deteriorating patient in rural areas.
New graduate registered nurses often feel unprepared to care for the deteriorating patient. Whilst literature has recognised new graduate registered nurses working within metropolitan areas feel ill-equipped to care for deteriorating patients, there is a paucity of literature focused on experiences within the rural context.
Qualitative, descriptive phenomenological approach.
In-depth interviews were undertaken with 7 participants in rural Eastern Australia with collected data being subject to thematic analysis.
Three themes were identified that shares the lived experiences of the participants as they transitioned into the rural team: First encounters—Transition to the rural team; Practice support for managing deterioration; and The road to confidence.
New graduate registered nurses are unprepared to care for the deteriorating patient in rural areas. Practice support and barriers to ongoing education are influential on their experience with findings from this study supporting focused rural healthcare preparation from tertiary education providers, plus structured practice support from senior rural nurses and health facility orientation programs. Preparation should include the use of digital technologies and escalation and management of the deteriorating patient alongside rural policies and procedures to enhance patient safety and support new graduate rural nurses.
The findings have implications for tertiary undergraduate nursing education and those supporting New Graduate Registered Nurses in their transition to practice in rural areas. Enhancement of new graduate nurses' skills and abilities in recognition and responding to patient deterioration through both technological and personnel support will enhance patient safety within rural health care.
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
7 participants were involved in the study.
This scoping review aimed to explore and identify literature about the scope of practice for nurse practitioners working as immunisers in primary healthcare.
The review was conducted according to the JBI scoping review framework.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted on 11 December 2023 to identify primary studies examining the role of nurse practitioners in immunisation delivery within global primary healthcare settings. The inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed primary research that specifically examined nurse practitioners’ roles in primary healthcare settings in immunisation clinics and/or administering immunisations. Data were systematically extracted using a data extraction table, and article screening was independently performed by two reviewers. Reporting of findings was guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist.
Medline, Scopus and CINAHL including peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to December 2023.
A total of 1025 articles were identified; following screening and removal of duplicates, 52 articles underwent full-text screening and 8 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Themes were identified using a qualitative descriptive approach: nurse practitioner scope of practice in primary healthcare; nurse practitioners addressing service gaps in primary healthcare; and the nurse practitioner's role in immunisation provision in primary healthcare.
Findings suggest that the roles and responsibilities of nurse practitioners working in primary healthcare are highly variable. Little research has been conducted to explore the nurse practitioner's immuniser role in primary healthcare.
No patient or public involvement was included in this scoping review.
This review provides insight into the current knowledge about the Nurse Practitioner Immuniser role in Primary Healthcare. While Nurse Practitioners have contributed to public immunisation efforts globally, the role and scope of nurse practitioner immunisers in primary healthcare are still evolving.
To investigate risk factors for re-infection and compare the outcomes in people with diabetic foot infections. A retrospective chart review was conducted, and 294 hospitalised patients with moderate to severe diabetic foot infections (DFIs) were analysed for this study. The diagnosis and classification of the severity of infection was based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) infection guidelines. Skin and soft tissue infections were diagnosed based on clinical observations as per IWGDF classification in addition to ruling out any suspected osteomyelitis (OM) through negative bone culture, MRI or WBC SPECT CT. OM was confirmed by bone culture or histopathology. Clinical outcomes were based on a 12-month follow-up period. All dichotomous outcomes were compared using χ 2 with an alpha of 0.05. The result of this study shows a 48% rate of re-infection in people admitted to our hospital with moderate and severe diabetic foot infections (DFI). Patients with osteomyelitis present during the index admission were 2.1 times more likely to experience a re-infection than patients with soft tissue infection (56.7% vs. 38.0% respectively). In the univariate analysis, risk factors for re-infection included osteomyelitis, non-healing wounds, prolonged wound healing, antidepressants and leukocytosis. In the regression analysis, the only risk factor for re-infection was wounds that were not healed >90 days (HR =2.0, CI: 1.5, 2.7, p = 0.001). Re-infection is very common in patients with moderate and severe diabetic foot infections. Risk factors include osteomyelitis, non-healing wound, prolonged wound healing, antidepressants and leukocytosis.
To explore whether sleep deprivation contributes to medication errors in registered nurses (RNs).
Sleep deprivation is a potential issue for RNs, particularly those who work shifts. Sleep deprivation has been found to have a negative impact on numerous cognitive processes. Nurses administer several medications to patients a day, potentially while sleep deprived—anecdotal reports suggest that this could result in an increased risk of error occurring.
A scoping review was conducted using the Prisma-ScR extension framework to explore what is known about the effect of RNs' sleep deprivation on medication administration errors.
A search of databases generated 171 results. When inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 18 empirical studies were analysed. Studies included retrospective analysis of errors, surveys of perceptions of causes and observational studies.
Data indicated that RNs consider fatigue, which may be caused by sleep deprivation, to be a contributing factor to medication errors. The search only identified three observer studies, which provided conflicting results as to whether lack of sleep contributes to the error rate. Of the numerous tools used to measure sleep, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was the most frequently used.
Although RNs anecdotally consider a lack of sleep potentially contributes to medication errors, there is insufficient research to provide robust evidence to confirm this assumption.
Patient or public contributions were not required for this scoping review.
Sleep deprivation is a potential issue for nurses, especially those who work shifts. Poor sleep impacts cognitive processes that potentially could increase errors. Nurses should be aware of the impact sleep may have on patient safety.
FreshRSS 