To develop prediction models for short-term outcomes following a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) event (index) or for past AMI events (prevalent) in a national primary care cohort.

Retrospective cohort study using logistic regression models to estimate 1-year and 5-year risks of all-cause mortality and composite cardiovascular outcomes.

Primary care practices in England contributing data to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum and CPRD GOLD databases between 2006 and 2019.

Patients with an incident (index) or prevalent AMI event. Models were trained on a random 80% sample of CPRD Aurum (n=1018 practices), internally validated on the remaining 20% (n=255) and externally validated using CPRD GOLD (n=248).

Discrimination assessed using sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration assessed using calibration plots.

In the index (prevalent) cohorts, 94 241 (64 789) patients were included in the training and internal validation sets, and 16 832 (7479) in the external validation set. For the index cohort, AUCs for 1-year [5-year] all-cause mortality were 0.802 (95% CI 0.793 to 0.812) [0.847 (0.841 to 0.853)] internally and 0.800 (0.790 to 0.810) [0.841 (0.835 to 0.847)] externally. For the primary composite outcome (stroke, heart failure and all-cause death), AUCs were 0.763 (0.756 to 0.771) [0.824 (0.818 to 0.830)] internally and 0.748 (0.739 to 0.756) [0.808 (0.801 to 0.815)] externally. Discrimination was higher in the prevalent cohort, particularly for 1-year mortality (AUC: 0.896, 95% CI 0.887 to 0.904). Models excluding treatment variables showed slightly lower but comparable performance. Calibration was acceptable across models.

These models can support clinicians in identifying patients at increased risk of short-term adverse outcomes following AMI, whether newly diagnosed or with a prior history. This can inform monitoring strategies and secondary prevention and guide patient counselling on modifiable risk factors.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a prevalent condition among breast cancer survivors, often exacerbated by oncological treatments. Hormonal therapies are typically contraindicated in this population, necessitating effective non-hormonal interventions.

This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multimodal pelvic floor physiotherapy—comprising pelvic floor muscle training, non-ablative radiofrequency, therapeutic pelvic health education and the use of vaginal moisturisers—versus fractional CO₂ laser therapy combined with vaginal moisturisers in alleviating GSM symptoms in breast cancer survivors. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups. Primary outcomes include measures of sexual function (assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index), subjective pelvic perineal pain intensity (measured with a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale) and health-related quality of life (assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast), assessed at baseline, post-intervention and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Statistical analyses will be conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the interventions.

The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics and Health Research Committee of the University of Alcalá (Reference: CEIP/2024/1/012). All participants will provide informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, and by engaging with patient associations and survivor groups through tailored materials.

NCT06721936.

Harms due to methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD) are rising globally. Untreated withdrawal symptoms perpetuate the cycle of dependence and are a barrier to treatment. There is no pharmacotherapy approved for methamphetamine withdrawal. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) dimesylate has potential as an agonist therapy to ameliorate symptom severity during acute methamphetamine withdrawal and increase duration of initial abstinence and retention in treatment.

We will conduct a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of LDX in reducing symptom severity during acute methamphetamine (MA) withdrawal. One hundred eighty-four adults with moderate to severe MAUD presenting to a health service requesting MA withdrawal treatment who report use of MA within the last 72 hours will be recruited. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive a tapering dose of lisdexamfetamine (250 mg on day 1, reducing by 50 mg per day to 50 mg on day 5, followed by 2 days of placebo washout on days 6 and 7), or placebo for 7 days. The study will be conducted over 7 days in an inpatient unit, and all participants will also receive standard inpatient withdrawal care. Participants will be followed up in the community to day 84. The primary outcome is efficacy, defined as the between-group difference in average withdrawal severity measured over the 7-day admission by the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are retention in treatment, treatment satisfaction, sleep and concomitant medication use (symptomatic medications and medications for other indications to day 7); safety, craving for MA, post-treatment withdrawal symptoms, depression, anxiety and stress, insomnia and cost effectiveness (to day 28) and MA use, mental, physical and social health and post-withdrawal treatment utilisation (to day 84). A First Nations qualitative substudy will assess the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants, ensuring the treatment meets the needs of First Nations people.

This protocol was first approved by the St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 15/05/2024 (2024/ETH00788). All participants will be provided with a participant information sheet and consent form, be fully informed about the study and given ample time to consider participation. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Findings will be presented such that individual participants will not be identifiable.

ACTRN12624001061527.

Despite the increasing availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), women’s experiences and motivations remain largely unknown. The use of NIPT is increasing in Italy; however, its organisation and access paths vary considerably. Women may undergo testing in either public or private facilities, where differences in pretest information, testing procedures and result communication may influence their experience. This study aims to investigate the attitudes, awareness and experiences of Italian women undergoing NIPT.

A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted via social media in the period March–August 2023.

This nationwide study was conducted in Italy.

Women over 18 years old who had undergone NIPT were included.

Responders were 4154 women from every part of Italy. Most participants perceived the information provided during pre-NIPT counselling as extremely/very clear (68.2%) and helpful (72.5%), with higher proportions observed when counselling was delivered by geneticists. The mean knowledge score was 12.3 (range: 0–15) and was statistically higher for women with higher education level and prior NIPT experience. Half of the women reported no change in their perceived risk of having a child with chromosomal abnormalities after pre-NIPT counselling, and risk perception reduction was associated with lower knowledge scores. Pretest negative emotions were common (54.9%) and influenced by testing context, information sources and reasons for testing. Most women reported a positive impact from results (92.7%), shaped by information delivery made and prior knowledge. Regret was rare (3.0%) and linked to reasons and perceived risk changes. Overall, satisfaction was high (97.3%), particularly among those prioritising informed decision-making.

Improving personalised counselling and education throughout the NIPT journey seems crucial to minimise negative emotional impacts, highlighting the need for well-trained healthcare professionals.

Migrants in Australia are a vulnerable group to drowning, yet their participation in water safety programs remains limited. Previous research has focused on migrants already engaged in water-related activities, overlooking perceptions from those facing broader access challenges. Additionally, migrants have often been treated as a homogeneous group, neglecting intersectional factors such as age, gender, ethnicity and income level that influence access to programs.

This phenomenological qualitative study addresses these gaps by employing a novel approach to recruitment: conducting in-depth interviews with purposively selected recent migrants in a non-traditional setting—hairdressing salons—to capture diverse perspectives. A variety of ethnicities, ages and genders were recruited. Thematic analysis with an inductive approach was used to analyse the data.

Findings showed that most migrants were unaware of water safety programmes. While acknowledging the importance of water safety, they prioritised other pressures, such as income generation. However, affordable and culturally tailored training programmes for adults, delivered in culturally safe environments, may enable participation. Social connections, especially among students, could also be leveraged. Although parents rarely participated, they prioritised enrolling their children in swim training. Ethnicity-specific adaptations, such as native-language trainers, were considered desirable. Informants suggested disseminating water safety information to migrants before arrival in Australia or through community magazines and universities.

This study highlights the importance of intersectional, community-driven designing of water safety programmes and demonstrates the effectiveness of innovative recruitment methods in reaching underrepresented migrant populations. These findings provide actionable insights for developing inclusive and accessible drowning prevention strategies.

Despite a lack of evidence relating to effectiveness and safety, the use of apps in the field of mental health is increasing due to their ease of use and accessibility. The aim of the EvalDepApps project is to develop and validate an assessment tool for evaluating depression management apps based on scientific evidence, expert judgement and end-user needs.

The purpose of this study was to determine the most relevant criteria for evaluating apps intended to manage depression through consensus-based assessment.

A total of 43 individuals were invited to participate in an online modified Delphi study of 51 criteria identified from the literature. In Round 1, participants rated criteria according to relevance and three levels of consensus were defined: high level when ≥80% of respondents scored the criterion at 5 or 6; medium when 60%–79% of respondents scored the criterion at 5 or 6 and low when

The response rate was 59.0% (26/43) in Round 1 and 53.4% (23/43) in Round 2. In Round 1, 24 criteria (47.1%) attained the maximum level of consensus, 20 (39.2%) the medium level and 7 (13.7%) the lowest level. In Round 2, 4 out of 20 criteria (20.0%) attained the maximum consensus. Participant comments reinforced the relevance of the selected criteria. The final list consisted of 28 criteria, the majority relating to Safety and Privacy and Clinical Effectiveness (25.0% each), followed by Usability and Functionality (17.9%).

By prioritising criteria relating to data safety and clinical effectiveness, participants in this study emphasised that the assessment of apps for depression management must take both these aspects into full consideration. Despite some limitations of the study (eg, lack of participant sociodemographic data and its implications for generalisation, not face-to-face inter-round), the results of this study will enable the EvalDepApps project to develop an assessment tool for depression management apps that incorporates the most relevant criteria.

EvalDepApps will support healthcare professionals and users in identifying safe, effective and user-friendly depression management apps.

Health systems must guarantee access to quality, safe and effective medicines. Essential medicine lists (EMLs) are crucial prioritisation tools to inform coverage decisions and steward limited health resources under the context of universal healthcare. This study aims to develop a consolidated framework for prioritising the assessment of health technologies to review and update EML for treating diseases or health problems managed in primary healthcare (PHC).

A mixed-methods approach was designed to validate the framework. An initial scoping systematic review will be conducted to search for studies that describe criteria used to prioritise the assessment of health technologies for PHC. The relevant studies will be examined using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping review studies. A comprehensive search was conducted in the following sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library (LILACS, WHO IRIS, IBECS, PAHO-IRIS, PAHO, LIS, BRISA), Health System Evidence, Global Healths, Health Evidence and Epistemonikos from the inception until February 2025. Two review authors will screen and extract data independently. The extracted data will be qualitatively analysed and presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form, alongside a narrative summary, in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. An iterative process online using the Delphi hybrid with stakeholders through predetermined consensus thresholds, a combination of a four-point Likert scale and open-ended questions will be conducted to select and validate the criteria identified in the scoping review.

We will provide a consolidated framework to inform decision-makers for prioritising the assessment of health technologies for the national EML for PHC. This is an important step in using evidence to inform public health policies. We plan to share findings through a variety of means, including publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at national conferences, invited workshops and webinars, email discussion lists affiliated with our institutions and professional associations, and academic social media.

The development of the target trial emulation (TTE) methodology has enhanced the conduct of non-randomised studies. By leveraging readily available routinely collected data, TTEs offer opportunities for complementing randomised controlled trials (RCTs), providing more precise estimates and improving the external validity of RCTs. To explore this potential, we selected a successfully completed RCT as a case study. In the FIRST-line support for Assistance in Breathing in Children (FIRST-ABC) step-up RCT, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was found to be non-inferior to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in terms of time to liberation from respiratory support in the paediatric critical care setting. We will emulate the FIRST-ABC step-up trial using routinely collected data from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database.

This is a protocol for a TTE that will use longitudinally collected data from the PICANet database. The study aims to emulate the FIRST-ABC step-up RCT using an observational study design in a frequentist framework. We will benchmark the results against the published trial. The study will apply a new-user design by selecting children admitted to paediatric intensive care units that started HFNC or non-invasive ventilatory support (as a surrogate for CPAP). The eligibility criteria and selected outcomes will reflect those of FIRST-ABC within the constraints of the available routinely collected data. We will use advanced quantitative doubly robust methods to minimise the impact of confounding by indication and allow for heterogeneity according to child characteristics. The analysis will be repeated using a Bayesian approach for follow-up research.

The research received ethics approval from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee. This study will expand the findings from the FIRST-ABC step-up RCT, providing additional insight from a large representative sample using real-world data. The frequentist and Bayesian approaches will enable a discussion about the advantages and drawbacks of the two strategies. The results will be disseminated to the research and clinical community and made accessible to the public. In addition, the study results will be used in future research, which aims to supplement RCTs with additional evidence from a TTE.

Inhaled anaesthetics can be used in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients to provide sedation. This approach to sedation potentially improves patient and health system outcomes, but further supportive evidence is needed. The objective of the SAVE-ICU clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of inhaled versus intravenous sedation in ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

SAVE-ICU is a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial conducted in 15 intensive care units (ICUs) in Canada and the USA. Eligible patients include mechanically ventilated and sedated adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19 or non-COVID causes with PaO₂/F_IO₂ ratio 12 hour). A hierarchy of outcomes was identified at the time of trial design, as the trial was launched during the COVID-19 pandemic when study drug shortages, staffing challenges and healthcare system pressures were prevalent and there was a requirement for rapid evidence generation and implementation on this topic. The primary outcome and highest in the hierarchy is hospital mortality (requiring 758 participants). Secondary and lower hierarchical outcomes are ventilator-free days at day 30 (200 patients), quality of life at 3 months (144 participants) and ICU-free days at day 30 (128 participants). Additional secondary outcomes include median daily oxygenation at day 3 (PaO₂/F_IO₂ ratio), need for adjunctive acute respiratory distress syndrome therapies (prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, paralysis with a neuromuscular blocking agent and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) during ICU stay, days alive and free from delirium and coma at day 14, hospital-free days at day 60 and disability score at 3 months and 12 months after enrolment.

The protocol was approved by all hospital ethics committees and by Health Canada. Informed consent will be obtained from substitute decision makers or deferred consent (as permitted by site ethics board). Trial findings will be shared at the end of the study using peer-review publications, conference presentations and social media as part of the trial knowledge translation plan.

NCT04415060.

Care pathways are crucial for patients with mental health disorders and should be designed to support integrated rehabilitation while reducing the burden of these disorders. The contemporary shift toward an outpatient follow-up model of care presents an opportunity to improve mental health care beyond the stagnation in advancements in pharmacological treatments. Various pharmacist-led interventions exist and can serve as levers to address ongoing challenges in mental health care pathways: they could help manage difficult transitions, ensure continuity between inpatient and outpatient care, and reduce high rehospitalisation rates. However, the contexts in which these solutions benefit patients and improve care outcomes remain unclear. Thus, the primary objective of this study will be to identify how pharmaceutical solutions contribute to improving mental health care pathways, what works, for whom and in what context. The secondary objective will be to identify the key outcomes currently used to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical solutions on care pathways.

A systematic realist review will be conducted, following 5 iterative steps to synthesise heterogeneous evidence: (1) Scope definition with a general review of the literature and experts’ discussions, (2) Initial programme theory development based on the preliminary searches, (3) Systematic review for evidence, to refine and test initial programme theory across PubMed, Embase and Web Of Science, (4) Data extraction, including context-mechanism-outcome configurations, and evidence appraisal and (5) Data analysis, synthesis and refined programme theory construction with the realist logic. This process will involve consensus among expert researchers, incorporating insights from individuals with lived experience.

The final programme theory modelling will result in a new framework for pharmaceutical solutions applied in diverse mental health contexts. The findings of this systematic realist review could serve as a guide for implementing pharmaceutical solutions across healthcare settings, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant and grounded in real-world needs.

As this realist review will collect previously published data and will not involve human or animal participants, no ethical approval is required. Since this manuscript is a review protocol, no datasets were generated or analysed. All data extraction forms will be made available as part of the publication of the realist review.

Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251011954.

Dates of the study: September 2025 to September 2026.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological condition that affects approximately 150 000 people in the UK and presents a significant healthcare burden, including the high costs of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). DMTs have substantially reduced the risk of relapse and moderately reduced disability progression. Patients exhibit a wide range of responses to available DMTs. The Predicting Optimal INdividualised Treatment response in MS (POINT-MS) cohort was established to predict the individual treatment response by integrating comprehensive clinical phenotyping with imaging, serum and genetic biomarkers of disease activity and progression. Here, we present the baseline characteristics of the cohort and provide an overview of the study design, laying the groundwork for future analyses.

POINT-MS is a prospective, observational research cohort and biobank of 781 adult participants with a diagnosis of MS who consented to study enrolment on initiation of a DMT at the Queen Square MS Centre (National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London) between 01/07/2019 and 31/07/2024. All patients were invited for clinical assessments, including the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, brief international cognitive assessment for MS and various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). They additionally underwent MRI at 3T, optical coherence tomography and blood tests (for genotyping and serum biomarkers quantification), at baseline (i.e., within 3 months from commencing a DMT), and between 6–12 (re-baseline), 18–24, 30–36, 42–48 and 54–60 months after DMT initiation.

748 participants provided baseline data. They were mostly female (68%) and White (75%) participants, with relapsing–remitting MS (94.3%), and with an average age of 40.8 (±10.9) years and a mean disease duration of 7.9 (±7.4) years since symptom onset. Despite low disability (median EDSS 2.0), cognitive impairment was observed in 40% of participants. Most patients (98.4%) had at least one comorbidity. At study entry, 59.2% were treatment naïve, and 83.2% initiated a high-efficacy DMT. Most patients (76.4%) were in either full- or part-time employment. PROMs indicated heterogeneous impairments in physical and mental health, with a greater psychological than physical impact and with low levels of fatigue. When baseline MRI scans were compared with previous scans (available in 668 (89%) patients; mean time since last scan 9±8 months), 26% and 8.5% of patients had at least one new brain or spinal cord lesion at study entry, respectively. Patients showed a median volume of brain lesions of 6.14 cm³, with significant variability among patients (CI 1.1 to 34.1). When brain tissue volumes z-scores were obtained using healthy subjects (N=113, (mean age 42.3 (± 11.8) years, 61.9% female)) from a local MRI database, patients showed a slight reduction in the volumes of the whole grey matter (–0.16 (–0.22 to –0.09)), driven by the deep grey matter (–0.47 (–0.55 to –0.40)), and of the whole white matter (–0.18 (–0.28 to –0.09)), but normal cortical grey matter volumes (0.10 (0.05 to 0.15)). The mean upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA), as measured from volumetric brain scans, was 62.3 (SD 7.5) mm². When CSA z-scores were obtained from the same healthy subjects used for brain measures, patients showed a slight reduction in CSA (–0.15 (–0.24 to –0.10)).

Modelling with both standard statistics and machine learning approaches is currently planned to predict individualised treatment response by integrating all the demographic, socioeconomic, clinical data with imaging, genetic and serum biomarkers. The long-term output of this research is a stratification tool that will guide the selection of DMTs in clinical practice on the basis of the individual prognostic profile. We will complete long-term follow-up data in 4 years (January 2029). The biobank and MRI repository will be used for collaborative research on the mechanisms of disability in MS.

The UK’s medical workforce is under increasing strain, and this is compounded by increasing numbers of resident doctors diverging from specialist training pathways, instead entering non-training roles, reducing clinical hours or leaving the profession or UK workforce entirely. These decisions are shaped by both individual motivations and wider structural conditions, including unsatisfactory working conditions, limited flexibility and a perceived lack of support or autonomy. While pursuing alternative career routes offers personal and professional benefits, they can also delay progression to senior clinical roles, contributing to workforce instability. There remains limited understanding of how best to support retention, particularly given the varied contexts, settings and career trajectories of resident doctors. This realist synthesis will examine how, why and in what contexts resident doctors leave the National Health Service, and what interventions might support their retention.

This realist synthesis will follow Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards guidance and will be conducted in five iterative steps: (1) identifying existing theories to develop an initial programme theory; (2) undertaking formal and purposive searches to identify relevant UK-based literature; (3) selecting documents based on relevance and rigour; (4) extracting and coding data to support the development of explanatory insights; and (5) synthesising findings using a realist logic of analysis to develop and refine context-mechanism-outcome configurations. An advisory group will guide the review throughout. The final programme theory will inform the development of evidence-based recommendations and design principles to support resident doctor retention.

Ethical approval is not required for this synthesis of existing literature. Findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conference presentations and accessible formats, including infographics, plain English summaries and blog posts. Target audiences include resident doctors, medical educators, workforce planners and policymakers.

PROSPERO, CRD420251004453.

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are associated with adverse outcomes. However, attention has typically focused on outcomes considered relevant by doctors, whereas the potential gap in perception and relative importance of outcomes that may exist between patients and doctors has been scarcely explored. Evidence available reports the views of either patients or doctors alone, and data are analysed in aggregate. We investigated this issue by surveying for the first time patients’ and doctors’ opinions simultaneously, on a one-to-one basis.

Survey involving patients with different CV diseases. Each patient and their attending doctor were asked to simultaneously but independently gauge the importance each attached to a predetermined set of outcomes, filling out disease-specific questionnaires. Results were analysed by compositional analysis.

Inpatients and outpatients being seen by cardiologists and internal medicine specialists at hospitals affiliated with the National Health System in Umbria, Italy.

All-comer patients, presenting with one of the following conditions: atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) or considered at high CV risk.

Importance attached to outcomes relative to life path, quality of life, future clinical events.

From 337 paired questionnaires returned, significant differences between patients’ and doctors’ perspectives emerged. Specifically: (1) patients with AF were significantly less concerned about the risk of stroke than doctors; (2) worsening of HF was a greater concern for doctors than patients, whereas patients weighed the risk of disability more; (3) patients with a previous MI, or at high CV risk, weighed the risk of hospitalisation less relevant than doctors, but were significantly more concerned about the risk of disability.

Simultaneous, one-to-one assessment of patients’ and doctors’ opinion shows remarkable differences between patients’ perception and physicians’ judgement concerning the relevance of major CV outcomes. Appreciation and sharing of these issues may inform better tailoring of cardiac care.

Preventing online and offline sexual harassment (SH) is a public health priority, due to its worldwide magnitude and short- and long-term consequences to the victims and survivors. Universities are environments that may facilitate different forms of conflicts, including SH, but they also play a key role in preventing and addressing them. This paper describes ‘Uni4Equity’, a European project funded by the CERV-2022-DAPHNE Programme of the European Union (Ref. 101094121-Uni4Equity) aimed to reinforce universities’ readiness to identify, map and respond to online and offline SH at workplace and other relevant settings (classrooms, digital space), with an explicit (but not exclusive) focus on minority social groups. More specifically, the project will address the research needs of conducting multidimensional diagnosis of SH at universities (scale and determinants) as a basis for preventive actions; assessing the effectiveness of preventive interventions such as social media campaigns and training workshops; creating a university culture that actively rejects SH; improving access to existing support services; and contributing to the acknowledgement of universities as an asset in preventing this issue.

The project follows an exploratory sequential design for the period 2023–2026. In phase 1, a mixed-method initial assessment based on online surveys, semistructured interviews and desk reviews is planned in six targeted universities: University of Alicante, Adam Mickiewicz University (AMU), University of Maia, University of Applied Sciences Burgenland (UASB), University of Antwerp (UAntwerp), University of Verona. Phase 2 integrates long-term and large-scale interventions at different levels of prevention (primary, secondary and tertiary) and implementation (interpersonal, institutional and social). These interventions combine online and offline training programmes addressed to students and staff, arrangements with internal and external support services and improvements in access to information and resources, including SH protocols and regulations. Phase 3 consists of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the different Uni4Equity interventions and a final evaluation of the global impact of the project.

Ethical approval was obtained by the different universities research ethics committees (Universidad de Alicante, vice-rectorate for research: Ref. no. UA-2023-03-27; Università di Verona, Comitato di Approvazione per la Ricerca sulla Persona: Ref. no. UNIVR-24/2023; UAntwerp, Ethics Committee for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Ref. no. EX_SHW_2023_38_1; AMU, Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Participants, Ref. no. UAM_19/2022/2023; UASB, Ethics Committee: Ref. no. UASB _28/08/2023; Universidade da Maia, Conselho de Ética e Deontologia: Ref. no. UMAIA_ 151/2023).

The research team will disseminate findings through peer-reviewed journal articles, presentations in scientific national and international events, policy briefs, infographics, videos and short reports.