Care pathways are crucial for patients with mental health disorders and should be designed to support integrated rehabilitation while reducing the burden of these disorders. The contemporary shift toward an outpatient follow-up model of care presents an opportunity to improve mental health care beyond the stagnation in advancements in pharmacological treatments. Various pharmacist-led interventions exist and can serve as levers to address ongoing challenges in mental health care pathways: they could help manage difficult transitions, ensure continuity between inpatient and outpatient care, and reduce high rehospitalisation rates. However, the contexts in which these solutions benefit patients and improve care outcomes remain unclear. Thus, the primary objective of this study will be to identify how pharmaceutical solutions contribute to improving mental health care pathways, what works, for whom and in what context. The secondary objective will be to identify the key outcomes currently used to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical solutions on care pathways.

A systematic realist review will be conducted, following 5 iterative steps to synthesise heterogeneous evidence: (1) Scope definition with a general review of the literature and experts’ discussions, (2) Initial programme theory development based on the preliminary searches, (3) Systematic review for evidence, to refine and test initial programme theory across PubMed, Embase and Web Of Science, (4) Data extraction, including context-mechanism-outcome configurations, and evidence appraisal and (5) Data analysis, synthesis and refined programme theory construction with the realist logic. This process will involve consensus among expert researchers, incorporating insights from individuals with lived experience.

The final programme theory modelling will result in a new framework for pharmaceutical solutions applied in diverse mental health contexts. The findings of this systematic realist review could serve as a guide for implementing pharmaceutical solutions across healthcare settings, ensuring that interventions are evidence-based, contextually relevant and grounded in real-world needs.

As this realist review will collect previously published data and will not involve human or animal participants, no ethical approval is required. Since this manuscript is a review protocol, no datasets were generated or analysed. All data extraction forms will be made available as part of the publication of the realist review.

Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251011954.

Dates of the study: September 2025 to September 2026.

This study assesses the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of licensed dietitians in Saudi Arabia regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in dietetics and identifies sociodemographic factors associated with higher AI knowledge and use, along with perceived benefits and concerns.

Descriptive, cross-sectional study with an analytical component.

Conducted online across Saudi Arabia, targeting licensed dietitians in public and private healthcare sectors.

161 licensed dietitians completed the study. Inclusion criteria consisted of current registration and active practice in either clinical or community settings.

The primary outcomes were levels of AI-related KAPs assessed via a structured questionnaire. The secondary outcomes examined associations between KAP and demographic factors.

Among participants, 62.7% reported using AI in practice; 72.3% found it easy to use and 63.4% believed it improved their work. Higher knowledge was significantly linked to being aged 24–40, female, married, Saudi, a university graduate and employed (p

Dietitians in Saudi Arabia generally recognise AI’s value in dietetic practice, particularly in programme development and personalisation. However, concerns about diminished human interaction remain. Structured training and further longitudinal research are recommended to support balanced AI integration.

To assess the time to first optimal glycaemic control and its predictors among adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia.

A retrospective cohort study.

University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, northwest, Ethiopia.

We recruited 423 adult diabetic patients who were diagnosed between 1 January 2018 and 30 December 2022 at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

The primary outcome was the time from diagnosis to the achievement of the first optimal glycaemic control, measured in months. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was fitted to identify predictors of time to first optimal glycaemic control. Data were collected with KoboToolbox from patient medical charts and exported to Stata V.17. The log-rank test was used to determine the survival difference between subgroups of participants.

Median time to first optimal glycaemic control was 10.6 months. Among 423 adult diabetic patients, 301 (71.16%) achieved the first optimal glycaemic control during the study period. Age category (middle age (adjusted HR (AHR)=0.56, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.76), older age (AHR=0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82)), comorbidity (AHR=0.52, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.76), therapeutic inertia (AHR=0.20, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.30) and medication non-compliance (AHR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.89) were significant predictors of time to optimal glycaemic control.

The median time to first optimal glycaemic control was prolonged. Diabetic care should focus on controlling the identified predictors to achieve optimal glycaemic control early after diagnosis.

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the perceived need and attitudinal perspectives regarding menstrual leave policies among young women in rural South India. The secondary objective was to determine the socio-demographic, menstrual and workplace-related factors associated with attitudes towards menstrual leave among young women.

An analytical cross-sectional study was performed from May 2023 to August 2023.

In a rural district of Tamil Nadu, South India.

The study encompassed 955 young female students above 18 years of age enrolled in educational institutions in a rural district of Tamil Nadu, India. Participants were pursuing diverse professional programmes including medical, dental, allied health sciences, pharmacy and engineering courses.

The primary outcomes included assessment of basic menstrual characteristics (age of menarche, regularity, product usage and pain experiences), pain evaluation using the WaLIDD scale (which measured working ability, anatomical pain location, pain intensity via Wong Baker scale and pain duration) and attitude assessment through a 10-dimension Likert scale. The attitude assessment explored both supportive factors (pain management, environmental considerations, medical leave allocation, menstruation normalisation and performance impact) and potential concerns (medicalisation, perceptions of fragility, stigma, disclosure issues and abnormal leave usage). Secondary outcome measures encompassed the analysis of factors influencing these attitudes, followed by a multivariable linear regression model to identify significant predictors.

Among 955 female students (mean age 19.56±1.33 years), the majority supported menstrual leave for maintaining hygiene (82.3%) and managing dysmenorrhoea (75.8%). A substantial proportion (64.4%) viewed it as a means of normalising menstruation discourse, while 61.6% believed it could enhance workplace performance. However, concerns existed about medicalising menstruation (47.9%) and reinforcing gender stereotypes (43.4%). Multivariate analysis revealed that medical students (B=0.67, 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.00), those with graduate-educated fathers (B=1.64, 95% CI: 0.31 to 2.97), earlier age at menarche (B=–0.23, 95% CI: –0.45 to –0.01) and participants reporting menstrual interference with daily activities (B=0.96, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.89) held significantly more positive attitudes.

While young women generally support menstrual leave policies, particularly for hygiene and pain management, there are significant concerns about workplace stigmatisation and gender stereotyping. Educational background, parental education and personal menstrual experiences significantly influence attitudes toward menstrual leave. These findings suggest the need for carefully structured menstrual leave policies that balance biological needs with workplace/student place equality concerns.

Influenza is a major global health concern, responsible for up to 650 000 respiratory-related deaths annually. Although influenza is often perceived as mild in healthy adults, it can cause severe outcomes in high-risk groups, such as older adults, young children, pregnant women and those with underlying medical conditions. Various clinical, sociodemographic and environmental factors influence the progression to severe outcomes, whereas resilience factors, such as vaccination, may reduce risks. Despite growing research, the evidence base regarding risk and resilience is spread across many different aspects of the literature. This umbrella review will synthesise evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to identify key risk and resilience factors associated with the progression of influenza to severe outcomes in the general population.

This umbrella review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. We will include systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting host-related risk or resilience factors for severe influenza outcomes. Four databases (EMBASE, Scopus, Medline and CINAHL) will be searched for English-language publications. Study quality will be assessed using AMSTAR 2, and the body of evidence will be evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Due to heterogeneity, findings will be analysed narratively. Risk and resilience factors will be grouped into demographic, clinical, behavioural, social and psychological domains.

No ethical approval is required. The completed review will be shared through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

CRD420250644475.

The Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Evaluation Study with Addition of the Nonavalent Vaccine Study (QUEST-ADVANCE) aims to provide insight into the long-term immunogenicity and effectiveness of one, two and three HPV vaccine doses. Here, we describe the protocol for QUEST-ADVANCE.

QUEST-ADVANCE is an observational cohort study including males and females who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with the quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine in British Columbia, Canada. Female participants who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1–3 doses of the quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine at 9–14 years of age will be recruited approximately 5 or 12 years postvaccination eligibility. Male participants who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1 or 2 doses of the nonavalent HPV vaccine at 9–14 years of age will be recruited at approximately 5 years postvaccination eligibility. The study involves a maximum of four visits over a period of 4–5 years for female participants, and two visits over a 12-month period for male participants. At each visit, self-collected swabs (cervico-vaginal or penile) and questionnaire data will be collected. In each study group, a subset of participants will be invited to participate in a substudy evaluating the long-term humoral immunogenicity of the HPV vaccine. Additional blood samples will be collected from participants who are part of the immunogenicity substudy. The total required sample size is 7180 individuals. The primary objectives are (1) to examine vaccine effectiveness in males and females against prevalent genital HPV infections for one, two and three doses of the HPV vaccine compared with unvaccinated participants and (2) to evaluate if there is non-inferior immunogenicity as indicated by type-specific antibody response of one dose of the HPV vaccine in 20–27-year-old females vaccinated at 9–14 years of age compared with historical data of three doses of the HPV vaccine females vaccinated at 16–26 years of age up to 12 years postvaccination.

QUEST-ADVANCE was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia/Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia (H20-02111). Individual electronic informed consent or assent will be obtained from each participant before any study-specific procedures are undertaken. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and on the study website.

Lower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a ‘camera in a pill’ that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity.

The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.

We will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice.

The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services.

The study has approval from the North East—Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public.

ISRCTN16126290.

To explore how learner transformation manifests in a communal arts and humanities (AH) educational activity for medical students.

Mixed methods explorative study.

UK-based medical school that follows a 5-year case-based learning curricular model.

A group of 105 first-year medical students attended a group viewing of a TV documentary titled, ‘Life on the List’ as part of their core curriculum. The documentary explores the humanistic aspects of kidney disease, organ donation and transplantation by portraying the personal stories of transplant recipients, donors and healthcare professionals. Following the screening, attendees engaged in a question-and-answer session with an expert panel.

Perceived transformation of learning was measured using a quantitative Likert-scale paired pre-screening and post-screening questionnaire. Additionally, the qualitative study used facilitated focus groups (FGs) to explore how learners may or may not have transformed their learning based on the AH educational activity.

Inclusion criteria were: (a) first-year medical students and (b) those who attended the screening. Those not meeting these criteria were excluded. The quantitative questionnaire was completed by 94 participants, while 19 attended FG interviews.

Paired t-tests were conducted to compare pre-screening and post-screening responses across five questions. All results demonstrated statistical significance (phow learning was transformed: (1) an absorbing experience; (2) confronting and challenging: different ways of seeing the world; (3) collective reflection: the power and safety of the crowd; (4) ‘everything just came into perspective’: accepting the world in a new way; and (5) willing to change the world: advocacy and agency. By this collective experience focusing on real patient stories and providing an opportunity for discussion and reflection, participants were offered a holistic view on kidney medicine and transplantation. Overwhelmingly, participants were inspired to strive for person-centred care, with many being motivated to explore kidney medicine and transplantation as career options.

Couched in pedagogy, an AH educational activity for medical students can leverage learner transformation and promote person-centred care. With respect to kidney medicine, organ donation and transplantation, such activities can provide early career exposure to these fields. Students may be inspired to act as positive ambassadors for organ donation and transplantation and further explore these areas as future career options. Further research should investigate AH interventions in diverse groups from a longitudinal perspective to consider long-term effects in promoting holistic and empathetic patient care.

First post-contrAst SubtracTed (FAST) MRI, an abbreviated breast MRI scan, has high sensitivity for sub-centimetre aggressive breast cancer and short acquisition and interpretation times. These attributes promise effective supplemental screening. Until now, FAST MRI research has focused on women above population-risk of breast cancer (high mammographic density or personal history). DYAMOND aims to define the population within the population-risk NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) likely to benefit from FAST MRI. The study population is the 40% of screening clients aged 50–52 who have average mammographic density (BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) B) on their first screening mammogram. DYAMOND will answer whether sufficient numbers of breast cancers, missed by mammography, can be detected by FAST MRI to justify the inclusion of this group in a future randomised controlled trial.

Prospective, multicentre, diagnostic yield, single-arm study with an embedded qualitative sub-study: all recruited participants undergo a FAST MRI. An internal pilot will assess the willingness of sites and screening clients to participate in the study. Screening clients aged 50–52, with a clear first NHSBSP mammogram and BI-RADS B mammographic density (by automated measurement) will be invited to participate (recruitment target: 1000). The primary outcome is the number of additional cancers detected by FAST MRI (missed by screening mammography). A Fleming’s two-stage design will be used as this allows for early stopping after stage 1, to save participants, funding costs and time continuing to the end of the study if the question can be answered earlier.

The NHSBSP Research and Innovation Development Advisory Committee and the Yorkshire and Humber–Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (23/YH/0268, study ID (IRAS): 330059) approved this research protocol. Participation involves a two-stage informed consent process, enabling screening for eligibility through automated mammographic density measurement. Patients with breast cancer helped shape the study design and co-produced participant-facing documents. They will disseminate the results to the public in a clear and meaningful way. Results will be published with open access in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

ISRCTN74193022

Although lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the US, recent advances in early detection and treatment have led to improvements in survival. However, there is a considerable risk of recurrence or second primary lung cancer (SPLC) following curative-intent treatment in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Professional societies recommend routine surveillance with CT to optimise the detection of potential recurrence and SPLC at a localised stage. However, no definitive evidence demonstrates the effect of imaging surveillance on survival in patients with NSCLC. To close these research gaps, the Advancing Precision Lung Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes in Diverse Populations (PLuS2) study will leverage real-world electronic health records (EHRs) data to evaluate surveillance outcomes among patients with and without guideline-adherent surveillance. The overarching goal of the PLuS2 study is to assess the long-term effectiveness of surveillance strategies in real-world settings.

PLuS2 is an observational study designed to assemble a cohort of patients with incident pathologically confirmed stage I/II/IIIA NSCLC who have completed curative-intent therapy. Patients undergoing imaging surveillance will be followed from 2012 to 2026 by linking EHRs with tumour registry data in the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. Data will be consolidated into a unified repository to achieve three primary aims: (1) Examine the utilisation and determinants of CT imaging surveillance by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, (2) Compare clinical endpoints, including recurrence, SPLCs and survival of patients who undergo semiannual versus annual CT imaging and (3) Use the observational data in conjunction with validated microsimulation models to simulate imaging surveillance outcomes within the US population. To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to integrate real-world data and microsimulation models to assess the long-term impact and effectiveness of imaging surveillance strategies.

This study involves human participants and was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB), University of Florida IRB 01, under approval number IRB202300782. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Safety considerations encompass ensuring the confidentiality of patient information. All disseminated data will be de-identified and summarised.

The TRAjectory of knee heaLth in runners (TRAIL) study is a prospective cohort study investigating the long-term knee health trajectories of runners with and without a heightened osteoarthritis risk. This study aims to describe the recruitment results and baseline characteristics of the TRAIL cohort.

Runners aged 18–50 years and running ≥3 times and ≥10 km per week on average in the past 6 months were eligible. Participants were recruited via running podcasts, running clubs and social media between July 2020 and August 2023. Data were collected at study enrolment and at a face-to-face baseline testing session, which occurred a median of 33 weeks (IQR 18 to 86 weeks) after enrolment. Follow-up data collection is ongoing.

Out of 462 runners who completed an online registration form, 268 runners enrolled, of which 135 had a history of knee surgery (46% females) and 133 were non-surgical controls (50% females). 60% of the surgery group had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 33% meniscus and/or cartilage surgery, and 7% other knee surgery. 54 participants previously enrolled were unable to continue in the study before attending baseline data collection. Of the 214 runners who remained in the study and attended baseline data collection, 108 had a history of knee surgery (49% females) and 106 did not have a history of knee surgery (51% females).

Participants will be followed for 10 years through ongoing patient-reported outcomes and continuous monitoring of training loads using wearable devices. At baseline, 4- and 10-year follow-up, knee MRI and knee-health patient-reported outcomes will be collected to evaluate structural and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis progression. Data will inform guidelines for safe running practices and rehabilitation post-knee surgery.

A retrospective cohort study.

A large multispecialty, tertiary referral and teaching hospital in England, UK.

The study included 3175 consecutive adult ICU UPAs from hospital wards over a 6-year period (2014–2019).

Ward-based management of deterioration prior to ICU admission was assessed by the RRT, using a scored checklist—the UPA score. Admissions were compared in two groups according to their exposure to an RRT review in the 72 hours before ICU admission. Associations with in-hospital cardiac arrest within 24 hours before ICU admission and all-cause in-hospital mortality were estimated, using unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95%CI.

RRT review occurred in 1413 (44.5%) admissions and was associated with reduced odds of in-hospital cardiac arrest (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.78; p

An RRT review in the 72 hours prior to ICU admission was associated with reduced odds of in-hospital cardiac arrest but did not impact in-hospital mortality. Higher UPA scores were associated with increased incidence of both in-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. In addition, this study describes a novel and adaptable RRT scoring tool (the UPA score) for safety monitoring and quality improvement.

Public involvement in mental health research enhances research quality. The use of citizen science methods in mental health research has been described as a conclusion of a movement towards increased public involvement; however, this field is in its early stages of development. Our objective was to create a theory of change (ToC) for how citizen science can be used to enhance mental health research quality.

Iterative consultation with the stakeholders of an existing citizen mental health science study, that is, change for citizen science to achieve co-production at scale (C-STACS: https://www.researchintorecovery.com/research/c-stacs/)

We co-developed a ToC through an iterative consultation with C-STACS stakeholders who were (a) representatives of mental health community organisations (n=10), individuals with public involvement experience (n=2) and researchers (n=5). In keeping with established ToC practice, entities were identified, including long-term impacts, outcomes needed to create an impact, stakeholder assumptions and indicators for tracking progress.

A desired primary long-term impact of greater co-production of research was identified between researchers and members of the public, which would create a secondary impact of enhancing public capacity to engage in citizen mental health science. We proposed long-term outcomes needed to enable this impact: (1) greater co-production of research objectives and pathways between researcher and the public, (2) greater embedment of citizen mental health science into funder processes (eg, the creation of specific funding calls for citizen mental health science proposals, (3) greater clarity on the boundaries between citizen science and other participatory approaches (eg, so that there is not loss of impact due to conceptual confusion between these, (4) increased knowledge around effective frameworks to enable mass public participation and (5) greater availability of technology platforms, enabling safe and accessible engagement with citizen mental health science projects.

The proposed ToC is grounded in the C-STACS project, but intended to be broadly applicable. It allows the continued formation of a community of practice around citizen mental health science and should be reviewed, as greater knowledge is developed on how citizen mental health science creates change.