To assess the prevalence and magnitude of undisclosed financial conflicts of interest (COIs) among physician-authors in high-impact US-based psychiatry journals.

Cross-sectional study comparing the author self-reported disclosures to the journal(s) with payments mandatorily reported in the Open Payments database.

We examined original research articles published between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022 in two prominent US-based psychiatry journals: the American Journal of Psychiatry (AJP) and Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry (JAMA-PSY). Of 2872 publications screened, 74 articles authored by 27 eligible US-based physician-authors met the inclusion criteria.

Total payments received by authors within the 3 years prior to publication and the proportion of undisclosed payments. Additional analyses assessed payment types (research vs general), author demographics and study characteristics associated with undisclosed COIs.

US$4.54 million was paid to authors in the two journals, of which US$645 135 (14.2%) were undisclosed. AJP authors received US$205 943 (7.5% of total payments) in undisclosed payments, while JAMA-PSY authors received US$439 192 (24.8%). Research payments constituted 82.3% of all undisclosed payments. Total undisclosed payments among the top 10 highest-earning authors accounted for 84.8% (AJP) and 99.6% (JAMA-PSY) of all undisclosed payments to journals. Nearly all undisclosed payments, 96.2%, were made to authors conducting randomised controlled trials.

Substantial undisclosed financial COIs were identified among the top 10 earners in high-impact psychiatry journals. These findings highlight potential risks to research transparency and integrity. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of disclosure policies and develop mechanisms to mitigate COIs in psychiatric research.

Community participatory modelling merges participatory research approaches with mathematical modelling. Participatory approaches are grounded in the engagement of people with lived experience (eg, who are affected by the health condition under study) throughout the research process. Mathematical modelling of infectious disease (ID) dynamic transmissions is increasingly used as a tool for public health decision-making, generating predictions, inferring mechanisms and estimating the impact of potential interventions—all of which guide policies, strategies and resource allocation as part of the preparation and response to ID epidemics. However, little is known about the engagement of people with lived experience and affected communities in the ID modelling process. We will map the literature to explore participatory approaches undertaken in ID modelling (practical aspects of formalising participatory modelling), levels of participation and the potential influence from the perspective of communities engaged.

The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The search strategy includes three electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase), no language restrictions and sources published from 2000 to present. We will implement the search with and without the participatory keyword, as we recognise that some studies do not explicitly term community engagement as participatory modelling. After deduplication, two authors will independently screen the titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved with a third team member. We will extract the relevant information from the main text, parameter tables, supplemental files, bibliography, acknowledgment and author affiliation sections. The data extraction will follow a deductive content analysis where we draw from community-based participatory research approaches and established mathematical modelling steps. We will also extract data to assess whether there was equitable engagement of knowledge users by checking for indicators of three equitable engagement domains as outlined by the Ward framework (equity within partnership (eg, whether knowledge user influenced modelling decisions or remuneration), capacity to engage in future partnerships and shift in power/influence (eg, coauthorship). We will supplement our narrative analyses with summaries in tabular format and using appropriate data visualisations.

No ethics approval will be required for this scoping review because we will map evidence from publicly available literature sources. We will develop multilingual abstracts or one-page lay summaries of the findings (English, French and Swahili), a policy brief and will coauthor an open-access journal article. A summary of the findings will be shared via knowledge user-led presentations at the Maisha HIV and AIDS Conference and with other community-based organisations at the quarterly peer-to-peer support meetings.

The protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XQ2WP (December 2024).

To assess factors associated with the adoption of the WHO Package of Essential Non-Communicable Diseases (PEN) Protocol 1 at primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in Nepal after healthcare workers received training.

Cross-sectional study.

PHC facilities across various provinces in Nepal.

A total of 180 healthcare workers trained in PEN, recruited from a random selection of 105 basic healthcare facilities.

The adoption of PEN Protocol 1 components: blood pressure measurement, blood glucose screening, 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment using WHO/International Society of Hypertension risk charts and body mass index (BMI) assessment. Factors associated with protocol adoption were assessed using generalised estimating equations for ORs.

Among participants, 100% reported measuring blood pressure, while 56% measured blood sugar, 28% assessed CVD risk and 27% assessed BMI. The adoption of the CVD risk prediction chart was positively associated with the availability of amlodipine (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.00; 95% CI 1.09 to 8.27). The adoption of BMI assessment was positively associated with access to a stadiometer (aOR 3.23; 95% CI 1.26 to 8.30) and a glucometer (aOR 3.07; 95% CI 1.12 to 8.40), and negatively associated with lack of motivation/inertia of previous practice (aOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.87) and environmental factors such as lack of time and resources (aOR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.89). Blood glucose level measurements were positively associated with being at a PHC centre (aOR 7.34; 95% CI 2.79 to 19.3) and the availability of metformin (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.08 to 5.29).

Adoption of PEN Protocol 1 varied by component and was influenced by resource availability, provider motivation and system barriers. Addressing these factors is key to optimising implementation in low-resource settings.

To seek consensus among global experts on concepts, measures and approaches to guide national and global action to address HIV-related stigma and formulate a call to action. This outlines priorities to unite actors in more effectively responding to and resourcing efforts to address HIV-related stigma.

An adapted Delphi consensus-building process using two rounds of online questionnaires.

Online questionnaires sent to a global expert panel.

50 global experts on HIV-related stigma and discrimination representing sectors including civil society, people living with HIV and key populations, research and academia, clinical practice, law, non-profit organisations, the United Nations, and policy and donor organisations.

The panel reached consensus on 55 points relating to the 12 broad themes extracted from the evidence base. These comprised the importance of addressing HIV-related stigma at scale; HIV-related stigma terms and definitions; Frameworks; Programming and approaches; Community leadership in HIV-related stigma-reduction implementation; Intersectional stigma and discrimination; Stigma and discrimination measures and assessment scales; Monitoring and evaluation; Stakeholder and community participation in monitoring and evaluation; Knowledge gaps and research needs; Funding and Commitment calls. From these, a consensus statement and call to action were formulated on priorities for strong political and financial commitments by all countries to reduce and mitigate HIV-related stigma and achieve global HIV targets adopted in 2021.

This study illustrated that global experts across sectors consider that action is needed to support the three critical enablers of the HIV response—society, systems and services—to ensure that HIV services are non-discriminatory and person-centred. The importance of attention and action to reduce stigma is critical in the current geopolitical and funding crisis affecting HIV and global health.