Patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience periods of disease stability and exacerbations (ECOPD). COPD imposes a negative and impactful extrapulmonary impairment and commonly overlaps with multimorbidity, particularly cardiovascular disease. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) aims to improve physical activity (PA) and quality of life, while behavioural change interventions (BCIs) aim to promote lifestyle changes and autonomy. However, after ECOPD, a variety of barriers often delay patient referral to PR. This study aims to assess the effects of a BCI for patients after ECOPD, focusing on cardiovascular health, PA and functionality. Additionally, the study will assess 6-month sustainability of PA and conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing a non-intervention group in the Unified Health System.

This randomised clinical trial will assess patients with ECOPD over 12 weeks using a BCI based on self-determination theory to increase daily steps. First, the cardiovascular and functional profile will be evaluated. Afterwards, the patients will receive an accelerometer to monitor the PA level. After 7 days, questionnaires will be applied on quality of life, symptoms and motivational levels for PA. Patients will be randomised into control group or intervention groups, both will receive educational booklets and IG will also receive an educational interview. PA will be tracked using activPAL accelerometer at weeks 1, 4 and 12, and follow-up at 6 months. Data analysis will include unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test for group comparison, and a linear mixed model to assess intervention effects over time. Economic evaluation, using STATA (V.14), will involve correlation analysis, and p

This study has been approved by the Federal University of São Carlos’ Ethics Committee, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Carlos and Base Hospital of São José do Rio Preto. All procedures will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines and applicable regulatory requirements. All results will be presented in peer-reviewed medical journals and international conferences.

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under the registration number RBR-6m9pwb7.

Mobile diagnostic imaging services provided at home increase accessibility and convenience, particularly for older adults, people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. These services can reduce the need for patient travel and support the routine monitoring of chronic conditions. However, current guidelines often overlook user acceptance and environmental considerations within the home setting.

To map studies that identify the models, barriers and facilitators for performing home-based diagnostic imaging/graph according to end users.

A scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Studies that addressed mobile or portable diagnostic imaging or graph examinations conducted in the home for individuals of any age or health status were included. Studies were eligible if they reported on barriers, facilitators or user experiences. Studies that focused on wearable technologies were excluded.

The search strategy was developed using terms related to home-based diagnostic imaging/graph, portability, home setting and user perceptions. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, The ACM Guide to Computing Literature and LILACS, without restrictions on publication date or language. Additional grey literature was identified through Google Scholar.

Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardised form that captured study characteristics, types of procedures, target populations and reported barriers and facilitators. Quantitative data were summarised using absolute and relative frequencies. Qualitative findings were synthesised through basic content analysis to identify and categorise recurring themes.

Data were charted in tables to organise and visually map study contexts, methodological features and thematic patterns related to implementation and user experience.

Twenty-six studies published between 1998 and 2023 across 15 countries were included. The diagnostic examinations included mostly polysomnography, X-ray imaging and ultrasonography. Seven categories of barriers were identified, such as physical discomfort, equipment-related challenges and procedural limitations. Seven facilitators were also reported, including perceived comfort, patient satisfaction and equipment usability.

This review identifies key factors affecting the delivery and user experience of mobile diagnostic imaging at home, including logistical, technical and environmental aspects. It reveals gaps in the literature and provides a basis for future research to inform more inclusive and effective public health policies and service design.

Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/7UV5D).

Although as many as 92% of survivors of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) report impacts to the head and/or non-fatal strangulation (NFS) that raise clinical suspicion of brain injury (BI), there are no evidence-based methods to document and characterise BI in this vulnerable population, limited clinical practice guidelines and insufficient understanding about long-term risks for conditions including Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). This leaves most survivors of IPV-caused BI (IPV-BI), overwhelmingly women, without adequate access to medical care and support, safe housing, back-to-school/work accommodations or follow-up care for long-term neurocognitive health. Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an established ADRD risk factor, little is known about the attributable risk of ADRD due to IPV-BI, particularly in women.

Our overarching objectives are to (1) use plasma biomarkers as novel tools to assist clinicians to improve diagnosis of IPV-BI at the acute, subacute and chronic stages in a manner sensitive to the needs of this vulnerable population and (2) raise awareness of the importance of considering IPV-BI as a potential ADRD risk factor. A prospective observational study funded by the US Department of Defense (HT9425-24-1-0462), Brain Canada (6200) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (523320-NWT-CAAA-37499) leverages collaborative research at multiple clinical sites in British Columbia to maximise equity, diversity and inclusion among participants, with a target enrolment of n=600 participants.

The Advocates, Academics, Survivors and Clinicians to END Intimate Partner Violence Biomarkers study, which is predicated on pre-specified research questions, represents one of the most significant community-based studies on plasma biomarkers affected by an IPV-BI incident. Of particular significance is the fact our study uses robust biomarker approaches being applied in the TBI and ADRD fields to determine how the biomarker profile after IPV-BI compares to typical TBI and the early stage of neurodegenerative disorders.

This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H24-01990, H22-02241 and H16-02792) and the Island Health Research Ethics Board (H22-03510). Upon publication of primary papers, de-identified data and biospecimens will be made widely available, including the US Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) federated database. Our data and integrated knowledge translation activities with persons with lived experience of IPV-BI and those working in the healthcare sector will be synthesised into co-designed and implemented knowledge tools to improve outcomes for survivors of IPV-BI.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) and depressive symptoms (DS) are highly prevalent, burdensome, costly and comorbid health conditions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) was shown to improve pain and disability in patients with CLBP; however, the effect on comorbid DS remains less certain. Interestingly, CLBP and DS seem to be associated with changes in interoception, which may be reversed by OMT.

The study protocol proposes a single-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of OMT on clinical symptoms (depression, pain and disability) and interoceptive functions (interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness) in patients with CLBP and comorbid DS. A sample of 60 adult subjects with CLBP and comorbid DS shall be recruited from osteopathic, orthopaedic and physiotherapeutic practices and educational institutes for osteopathy, sports science, psychology and medicine in Hamburg, Germany. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive six 45 min treatment sessions of either OMT (standard-OMT group) or sham treatment imitating OMT (sham-OMT group). Primarily, symptoms of depression, pain and disability will be assessed with the Beck’s Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondarily, interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness will be evaluated using the Heartbeat Tracking Task (HTT), Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) and confidence-accuracy correspondence (CAC). Ancillary, the therapeutic alliance will be investigated with the Helping Alliance Questionnaire. Data will be collected at baseline (t₀), the first, third and sixth treatment sessions (t₁, t₃, t₆) and at 3 months follow-up (t₇). The findings will be analysed for between-group differences using descriptive (mean and SD) and inductive statistics (mixed analysis of variance). It is hypothesised that standard-OMT, compared with sham-OMT, will reduce depression, pain and disability (BDI-II, NRS, ODI) and increase interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness (HTT, MAIA-2, CAC) in patients with CLBP and comorbid DS.

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical School Hamburg (MSH-2023/288). The anonymised dataset will be published in an online repository, and the results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

DRKS00031694.

Smoking is a well-established risk factor that exacerbates multiple sclerosis (MS) progression and increases disease activity. Smoking cessation promotion practices of MS clinicians are not meeting the needs of people with MS (pwMS). This study aimed to explore the current practices and barriers faced by MS clinicians in Germany.

A qualitative study design, using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.

Interviews with participants were held online, via telephone or face-to-face at our institute in Hamburg, Germany.

We recruited eight neurologists and four MS nurses from hospitals, neurology practices and rehabilitation facilities in Germany via purposive and snowball sampling.

We identified 27 codes across four themes: (1) knowledge: the 12 participants demonstrated a satisfactory general knowledge of the negative impacts of smoking on MS (2) current practice: significant variability was reported in the current practices, with some clinicians providing detailed advice while others merely assessing smoking status without further advice or assistance. (3) Barriers: key barriers identified included limited consultation time, perceived lack of patient motivation and insufficient availability of resources, like information material, for effective smoking cessation support. (4) Needs and wishes: participants wished for specific smoking cessation courses to which they could refer patients, as well as information material to use during patient counselling.

The study reveals considerable gaps in the consistency and comprehensiveness of smoking cessation support provided by MS clinicians in Germany. Addressing these gaps through targeted interventions, and improving the availability of information materials could enhance smoking cessation promotion for pwMS.

African, Caribbean and Black (ACB) communities experience disparities in health outcomes, with higher rates of chronic diseases, such as heart disease and stroke, and lower self-reported health status compared to their White counterparts. Barriers to timely access to healthcare services further exacerbate these inequities. Some studies link racialisation to surgical disparities and subpar surgical outcomes. However, the findings are diverse, and there is no synthesis of the evidence on disparities in surgical care for ACB patients in high-income countries with universal healthcare systems. The objective of the scoping review is to systematically describe, characterise and map the existing literature on disparities in the access to and quality of surgical care among ACB patients in high-income countries with universal healthcare systems, and to identify gaps in the literature on surgical access and quality of surgical care in ACB patients.

The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and report according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The search strategy will be customised for each database (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) using terms for ACB and surgery. Grey literature and references from included studies will be searched for additional sources, with no limitations on publication date or language. All study designs will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts in duplicate for eligibility. One reviewer will chart data, with a second reviewer validating the data charted. The findings will be synthesised, quantitatively summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitatively analysed through thematic analysis.

Ethics approval is not required as the study utilises published data. The dissemination of the findings will inform future research and improve understanding of the surgical care experiences of ACB patients. Dissemination will target academics and healthcare professionals through publications, presentations and workshops.

The menopause transition is a critical period of life for women associated with a variety of symptoms that may impact health status and quality of life. Menopause education can improve menopause knowledge and self-efficacy, leading to the adaptation of self-management strategies that may reduce menopause symptom burden and enhance quality of life. The purpose of this review is to systematically evaluate the research on the effect of menopause education interventions among midlife women (age 35–55 years) on menopause knowledge, self-efficacy, symptoms and quality of life.

This protocol is guided by the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will comprehensively search for articles published from all publication years through December 2024 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, and Scopus. The search strategy will include the following key terms and Medical Subject Headings terms: ‘menopause’, ‘menopausal’, ‘menopause transition’, ‘climacteric’, ‘health promotion’, ‘health education’ and ‘patient education’. Eligible studies will be experimental or quasi-experimental and include midlife women (age 35–55 years) who have received a menopause education intervention. Studies must report on the impact of menopause education interventions on menopause knowledge, self-efficacy, symptoms or quality of life. Only peer-reviewed articles and dissertations in English and Spanish will be included. Behavioural interventions (diet, physical activity, yoga) and medical interventions will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently perform data extraction and assess study quality/risk of bias with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised experimental studies (RoB2) and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I). A narrative approach will be used to synthesise findings.

Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations at professional scientific meetings and social media.

CRD42024599106.

There is limited evidence on the economic implications of assessing patients’ access to personalised treatments through Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) and Molecular Tumour Board (MTB), prompting the need to analyse their impact on the cost of the cancer diagnostic journey (from hospital admission to MTB evaluation) and accessibility to personalised therapies.

Retrospective observational cohort.

Patients discussed from April 2020 to September 2021 by the institutional MTB operating at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, an Italian centre of excellence in oncology pertaining to the national health system.

676 patients focused on: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), pancreatic carcinoma (PC) and gastro-oesophageal carcinoma (GEC). We defined two different scenarios: (1) patients tested with small Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels (≤60 biomarkers) vs (2) patients tested with comprehensive panels (>60 biomarkers).

We measured (1) patients’ eligibility to personalised therapies based on genomic data obtained using targeted somatic NGS panels, (2) MTB cost and the overall diagnostic journey cost and (3) the cost to find a patient eligible to access personalised treatments.

Tumour profiling with comprehensive NGS panels improved patients’ eligibility to personalised therapies compared with small panels (NSCLC: 39% comprehensive panel vs 37% small panel; CCA: 43% vs 17%; PC: 35% vs 3%; GEC: 40% vs 0%). The overall diagnostic journey cost per patient was between 3.2K and 7.4K (NSCLC: 7.4K comprehensive panel vs 6.4K small panel; CCA: 4.9K vs 3.7K; PC: 5.8K vs 4.5K; GEC: 4.2K vs 3.2K). MTB discussion accounted for only 2–3% of the diagnostic journey cost per patient (around 113/patient). The cost to find patient eligible for personalised treatments varied significantly according to panel size and tumour setting (NSCLC: 5K comprehensive panel vs 2.8K small panel; CCA: 4.4K vs 4.4K; PC: 5.5K vs 27K; GEC: 5.2K vs not measurable since none of the patients analysed with small NGS panels were eligible).

MTB discussion of genomic data obtained with NGS comprehensive panels significantly increases patient eligibility to targeted therapies and optimise the cost to find a patient eligible to personalised treatments, mainly for CCA, PC and GEC patients.