Conectar
Low-value care provides little or no benefit to patients, or its risk of harm outweighs the potential benefits. Non-nursing tasks refer to tasks performed by nurses below their scope of practice. With increasing pressure on the global nursing workforce, it is necessary to identify these concepts to deliver fundamental care.
To assess the prevalence, influencing factors and associations of low-value nursing care, and to identify non-nursing tasks and potential solutions in surgical hospital care settings.
The study followed a cross-sectional study design using a self-developed questionnaire.
A questionnaire on low-value care and non-nursing tasks was distributed to surgical wards in four hospitals in The Netherlands.
A total of 302 nurses responded to the survey. Five most prevalent low-value care practices were identified, including routine preoperative fasting (84.8%), taking over blood glucose monitoring (59.3%) and leaving in place any type of venous catheter (42.1%). These practices were mainly performed due to habitual practice, in accordance with an established protocol, or upon physicians' request. Most reported non-nursing tasks were administrative duties and cleaning patient rooms and equipment. Provided solutions included clearly defining responsibilities and taking personal responsibility.
Low-value care, provided by surgical nurses, is common in daily practice. This requires targeted de-implementation of each low-value care practice, based on influencing factors. Additionally, 85.8% of nurses perform non-nursing tasks daily or several times a day, underlining the need to re-organise nursing tasks.
De-implementing low-value care and reducing non-nursing tasks is necessary to ease pressure on the global nursing workforce and to improve fundamental care.
Low-value nursing care and non-nursing tasks persist when nurses lack leadership responsibility.
STROBE checklist.
No patient contribution.
Despite the increasing number of doctorally prepared midwives in Europe, particularly after the Bologna Declaration 1999, little is known about the context and experiences of their doctoral education.
To explore European initially qualified midwives' experiences with doctoral education; and the context of their education through their professional associations.
An exploratory descriptive observational survey.
An ethically approved web-based survey was used to collect data from midwifery associations and midwives in 33 European countries between October and December 2024. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the responses.
Twenty-two midwifery associations from 19 European countries and 207 midwives from 23 European countries participated. Over the last two decades, there has been an increase in the number of doctorally prepared midwives. Common reasons to gain doctoral qualifications included an interest in research, career progression, in particular in education, and improving healthcare. Midwives reported growing availability of European-wide opportunities for doctoral programmes, alongside an increase in the number of doctoral midwifery programmes and supervisors with midwifery expertise. Although many barriers were reported, effectively combining study with their personal life and support from family, friends and colleagues was highlighted as crucial factors in completing their doctoral studies.
This is the first study exploring the experiences of European midwives pursuing a doctoral degree. The findings highlight a need for universities to improve the collaboration with midwives' supportive networks as well as for the profession to reduce intraprofessional hostilities to enhance doctoral midwifery students' well-being.
Implications for the profession: Acknowledging challenges faced by these midwives is necessary to improve professional and institutional support in academia and midwifery.
Findings of this study inform strategies to improve doctoral education for midwives and, in this way, strengthen the contributions of midwives to maternal evidenced-based care development and healthcare innovations.
The Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) was used to guide reporting.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as the occurrence of two or more spontaneous pregnancy losses from the time of conception until 24 weeks of gestation. Currently, an underlying cause can be identified in only a minority of the losses. Potentially, an impaired maternal immune response targeting the semiallograft pregnancy may lead to miscarriage. While prior studies have explored the use of immune-suppressing corticosteroids to modulate the maternal immune system and hopefully improve pregnancy outcome, the absence of sufficiently powered randomised controlled trials (RCT) underscores the need for further research. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate if prednisolone administration in early pregnancy (20 mg daily for 6 weeks, then tapering doses for 2 weeks) in women with unexplained RPL leads to a higher live birth rate (LBR) in comparison to placebo. Additionally, the study assesses the tolerability, safety and the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. Finally, we will explore the effect of prednisolone in various subgroups (based on maternal age, number of previous pregnancy losses, presence of specific antibodies and pre-pregnancy endometrial immune cell level).
This ongoing multicentre, double-blind RCT will randomise 490 women with unexplained RPL and pregnancy
This study was submitted under the Clinical Trial Regulation (CTR) in Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) for assessment by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) under Clinical Trial number: 2023-503220-76-01. It received full approval on 29/01/2024. Study findings will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participants will be informed about the results by publishing them on the publicly available website of the study.
This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT05725512) and in CTIS (2023-503220-76-01).
The World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing “Do-not-do” list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care.
In this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.
In total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, “avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers” and “never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection.” Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as “use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence” and “application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain.” In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although “do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium” was prioritized by four out of five sectors.
Assessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system.
This paper provides an update of low-value care recommendations for nurses based on Dutch guidelines from 2017 to 2023, specified to five healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care and mental health care, with an accompanying prioritization of these low-value care recommendations to facilitate de-implementation. This paper provides a first overview of high-value care recommendations to reflect on and create alternative care practices for low-value care. The recommendations regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous improvement of appropriateness based on evidence, finally leading to better quality of care and improving patient outcomes.
FreshRSS 