Conectar
To identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework.
The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024.
Studies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience.
Nurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care.
Addressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review.
What problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment.
PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Lower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a ‘camera in a pill’ that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity.
The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.
We will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice.
The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services.
The study has approval from the North East—Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and osteoarthritis (OA) are globally prevalent chronic diseases that affect millions of individuals in ageing populations. Hip and knee replacements are well established and effective treatments in patients suffering from end-stage OA. Understanding how T2DM influences the outcomes of these surgeries is important for optimising patient care and improving surgical results. This study aimed to explore the association of T2DM with reoperation (regardless of the reason), adverse events (AEs) and mortality after primary hip and knee replacement surgery.
Observational study based on prospectively collected registry data analysed retrospectively.
Data from several Swedish national quality registers and health data registers were used to create a study database. 109 938 and 80 897 primary hip and knee replacements due to OA, performed between 2008 and 2019 (hip) and 2009 and 2018 (knee), were included in the study.
The risk of complications, such as reoperation, AEs and mortality, was investigated by estimating HRs using Cox regression, and OR using logistic regression, unadjusted and adjusted for confounding factors, such as patient characteristics, socioeconomic status and comorbidities, and mediators, such as surgical factors.
Adjusted multivariable Cox-regression analysis showed no T2DM-associated risk of reoperation after hip or knee replacement, adjusted HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.23) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24), respectively, while T2DM was associated with increased risk of death after hip and knee replacement, adjusted HR 1.40 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.47) and 1.38 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.45). Adjusted logistic regression analysis showed T2DM-associated increase of reoperation within 90 days (OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.43)) and increased mortality within 90 days (OR 1.42 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.95)) following hip replacement; however, this was not the case after knee replacement, OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.36) for reoperation and OR 1.29 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.94) for mortality. Several factors closely linked with T2DM, such as body-mass index and comorbidities, were identified as important when assessing risk of reoperation and mortality. Regarding AEs within 30 and 90 days, very slight but not statistically significant T2DM-associated increases were seen after either hip replacement, OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.11) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.16) or after knee replacement, OR 1.05 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.17) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.19).
The observed risk of reoperation suggests that T2DM alone was not a strong justification to advise against hip or knee replacement in individuals with T2DM deemed eligible for joint replacement. The T2DM-associated increased mortality after hip and knee replacement is challenging to interpret, as T2DM itself without undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery is associated with increased mortality.
by Susanne Jordan, Sarah Jane Böttger, Sabine Zinn
Health information about vaccinations is communicated via various sources of information and is crucial for vaccination decisions. Information sources such as interpersonal sources, traditional print and digital media as well as social media offer information about the risks and benefits of vaccination. During health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic was, some information sources provide hanging or contradictory information, alongside with misinformation and disinformation. Little is known about the relationship between the reported persuasiveness of different sources of information for individual vaccination decisions and differences in this between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Utilizing data from 10,284 participants in the “Corona-Monitoring Nationwide” survey in Germany from winter 2021/22, this study explored the relationship between the persuasiveness of information sources and vaccination decisions, considering socio-demographic and pandemic-related factors. For more than half of respondents, talks with family, friends, and acquaintances were the most convincing. Traditional media like television and radio were reported by 44%. Newspapers/magazines (online or print) and talks with physicians were each found the most convincing by around one third. About one fifth were persuaded by public authority’s flyers or websites. Less than a tenth each was convinced by social media/messenger services, brochures from pharmacies and health insurances, talks with pharmacy staff or online health portals. Significant differences emerged between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Unvaccinated people were four times more likely to report social media and messenger services as convincing compared to vaccinated people. Reporting talks with doctors and flyers/websites from public authorities as very persuasive significantly reduced the likelihood of being unvaccinated. The findings suggest that in future health crises, information should be disseminated through diverse sources, using both traditional and digital media, as well as interpersonal communication. Proactive science communication on social media and messenger services is crucial to counteract misinformation and disinformation.Severe mental disorders are associated with increased risk of metabolic dysfunction. Identifying those subgroups at higher risk may help to inform more effective early intervention. The objective of this study was to compare metabolic profiles across three proposed pathophysiological subtypes of common mood disorders (‘hyperarousal-anxious depression’, ‘circadian-bipolar spectrum’ and ‘neurodevelopmental-psychosis’).
751 young people (aged 16–25 years; mean age 19.67±2.69) were recruited from early intervention mental health services between 2004 and 2024 and assigned to two mood disorder subgroups (hyperarousal-anxious depression (n=656) and circadian-bipolar spectrum (n=95)). We conducted cross-sectional assessments and between-group comparisons of metabolic and immune risk factors. Immune-metabolic markers included body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose (FG), fasting insulin, Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR), C reactive protein and blood lipids.
Individuals in the circadian-bipolar spectrum subgroup had significantly elevated FG (F=5.75, p=0.04), HOMA2-IR (F=4.86, p=0.03) and triglycerides (F=4.98, p=0.03) as compared with those in the hyperarousal-anxious depression subgroup. As the larger hyperarousal-anxious depression subgroup is the most generic type, and weight gain is also a characteristic of the circadian-bipolar subgroup, we then differentiated those with the hyperarousal-anxious subtype on the basis of low versus high BMI (2 vs ≥25 kg/m2, respectively). The ‘circadian-bipolar’ group had higher FG, FI and HOMA2-IR than those in the hyperarousal-anxious-depression group with low BMI.
Circadian disturbance may be driving increased rates of metabolic dysfunction among youth with emerging mood disorders, while increased BMI also remains a key determinant. Implications for assessment and early interventions are discussed.
Transvaginal and transabdominal cerclage procedures have become established interventions to prevent mid-trimester pregnancy loss and preterm birth. Transabdominal cerclage seems to be superior to transvaginal cerclage in women with a history of a failed transvaginal cerclage. However, with the availability of a less invasive laparoscopic procedure, there is limited evidence concerning which type of cerclage to recommend to many other risk groups. The objective of this trial is to compare laparoscopic abdominal cerclage and transvaginal cerclage in women at moderate to high risk of spontaneous preterm birth.
The trial is an open, multicentre, superiority, parallel arm randomised controlled investigator-initiated trial with an embedded internal pilot. Women in whom the clinician has clinical equipoise between laparoscopic and transvaginal cerclage are randomised to either laparoscopic abdominal or transvaginal cerclage in a ratio of 1:1. The trial extends from sites in Denmark, Finland and Norway. The primary outcome is birth
The Central Denmark Region Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics, Denmark, Helsinki University Hospital Ethics committee, Finland and the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway approved the trial. This protocol is published prior to complete data collection and analysis. Important protocol changes will be made publicly available on ClinicalTrials.org, on the trial website and distributed electronically to all active sites. Positive, inconclusive as well as negative results from the trial will be published in peer-reviewed international scientific journals.
To describe the outcomes of an e(electronic)-Delphi survey used to achieve consensus on the essential elements that should be included in a multidisciplinary, nurse-led service for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).
The study design was based on a three-round e-Delphi survey.
A series of three survey rounds were used to gather expert opinions and achieve consensus on the key elements that should be included in a CHF disease management program from a sample of healthcare professionals and organizational leaders with expertise in existing CHF services. Consensus for each item was defined as at least 90% agreement.
There were 20 participants (18 healthcare professionals and 2 organizational leaders) in round-1, 22 (20 healthcare professionals and 2 organizational leaders) in round-2, and 17 (15 healthcare professionals and 2 organizational leaders) in round-3. Fifteen participants attended a final online meeting (13 healthcare professionals and 2 organizational leaders). Consensus was obtained on five essential components: (i) consumer education, (ii) treatment optimization using a multidisciplinary approach, (iii) discharge planning, (iv) provision of supportive community care and (v) mechanisms to respond to early symptoms of decompensated CHF.
Participants focused on mechanisms to improve treatment effectiveness, patient and family knowledge, communication between healthcare providers and supportive care in the community. The proposed model of care may be useful to other health service providers who are designing or adapting CHF models of care for the South-East Asian environment.
This research provides a solid basis for using a Delphi method to resolve the challenges and issues of transferring global model-based recommendations in CHF knowledge. The Delphi method proved successful as an important step in developing a culturally acceptable model of chronic care that meets the goals of local healthcare providers.
The North East of England has the lowest healthy life expectancy and the highest health inequalities of any region in England. The conventional model, whereby we ‘expect’ individuals to be motivated to attend a ‘healthcare setting’ to undergo cardiovascular disease (CVD) health checks every 5 years has low levels of uptake, with populations most at risk frequently failing to engage.
The objective of this study was to gather behavioural insights into the barriers/challenges that limit engagement with the current NHS CVD Health Checks.
Drawing on a Behavioural Insight approach, 7 qualitative focus groups with members of ethnic minorities and underserved groups (n=45 participants) were conducted to understand barriers and challenges to uptake of NHS CVD Health Checks in one region in North East England (Middlesbrough). Data were analysed using a Behavioural Insights approach, applied to establish key themes, barriers and enablers.
Our findings identified that underserved communities in North East England find engaging with NHS CVD Health Checks challenging due to issues related to access, understanding and attitudes. Communities identified that harnessing relationships with existing community champions would raise awareness and confidence in engaging. Making services accessible where communities gathered, while also increasing understanding and knowledge, was also recognised as key to engagement.
Our study suggested that despite there being substantial barriers to engagement with NHS CVD Health Checks, novel methods encouraging uptake may be effective to address the significant health inequalities seen in deprived communities. Ensuring a co-developed and co-delivered approach to CVD risk reduction with underserved communities, together with social marketing campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of CVD, and why reducing its risk is so important, is key to success.
The objective of this scoping review is to map and synthesise existing literature on interventions aimed at promoting healthy screen use among adolescents. This review identifies the types, functions and settings of interventions, explores the diversity of targeted outcomes and highlights equity considerations and research gaps.
We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
We systematically searched Medline, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2013 to June 2024. Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened.
We included peer-reviewed experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies reporting on interventions designed to promote healthy screen use among adolescents aged 10–19 years.
One author extracted data using a structured charting form, and a second author verified all entries. Results were synthesised descriptively across key themes including target populations, theoretical frameworks, intervention components and reported outcomes.
From 6433 records, we identified 93 articles on 81 interventions, mainly conducted in high school settings in the USA and Australia. Most examined short-term interventions targeting recreational screen time. Outcomes included media literacy, cyberbullying, internet and gaming addiction, safe internet use, social media use and mental and sexual health. Seventy-eight per cent of interventions attempted to educate adolescents, while 34% offered training activities (eg, educational sessions to elevate risk awareness and skill-based training to enhance digital literacy and self-regulation). Interventions targeting external influences were used less frequently. About 20% of studies showed no statistically significant findings, highlighting the need to promote evidence-based interventions.
This review identifies a need for broader, multilevel strategies that account for contextual factors and social determinants in influencing screen use and its related health issues. Future research should explore long-term effectiveness while examining the potential moderating and mediating effects of social determinants. Equity considerations were not a primary focus of most interventions, underscoring an important gap in this literature. Future interventions could incorporate equity-focused design and evaluation to ensure they respond to the needs of diverse adolescent populations.
by Johanna Charlotte Neubauer, Anna Kaiser, Leon Lettermann, Tobias Volkert, Alexander Häge
ObjectiveThis study evaluates the performance of four large language models—ChatGPT 4o, ChatGPT o1-mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Gemini 1.5 Flash—in answering multiple-choice questions in child and adolescent psychiatry to assess their level of factual knowledge in the field.
MethodsA total of 150 standardized multiple-choice questions from a specialty board review study guide were selected, ensuring a representative distribution across different topics. Each question had five possible answers, with only one correct option. To account for the stochastic nature of large language models, each question was asked 10 times with randomized answer orders to minimize known biases. Accuracy for each question was assessed as the percentage of correct answers across 10 requests. We calculated the mean accuracy for each model and performed statistical comparisons using paired t-tests to evaluate differences between Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 1.5 Flash, as well as between Gemini 2.0 Flash and both ChatGPT 4o and ChatGPT o1-mini. As a post-hoc exploration, we identified questions with an accuracy below 10% across all models to highlight areas of particularly low performance.
ResultsThe accuracy of the tested models ranged from 68.3% to 78.9%. Both ChatGPT and Gemini demonstrated generally solid performance in the assessment of in child and adolescent psychiatry knowledge, with variations between models and topics. The superior performance of Gemini 2.0 Flash compared with its predecessor, Gemini 1.5 Flash, may reflect advancements in artificial intelligence capabilities. Certain topics, such as psychopharmacology, posed greater challenges compared to disorders with well-defined diagnostic criteria, such as schizophrenia or eating disorders.
ConclusionWhile the results indicate that language models can support knowledge acquisition in child and adolescent psychiatry, limitations remain. Variability in accuracy across different topics, potential biases, and risks of misinterpretation must be carefully considered before implementing these models in clinical decision-making.
Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at seven-fold to ten-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) when compared with those who experience a normoglycaemic pregnancy, and the cumulative incidence increases with the time of follow-up post birth. This protocol outlines the development and validation of a risk prediction model assessing the 5-year and 10-year risk of T2DM in women with a prior GDM diagnosis.
Data from all birth mothers and registered births in Victoria and South Australia, retrospectively linked to national diabetes data and pathology laboratory data from 2008 to 2021, will be used for model development and validation of GDM to T2DM conversion. Candidate predictors will be selected considering existing literature, clinical significance and statistical association, including age, body mass index, parity, ethnicity, history of recurrent GDM, family history of T2DM and antenatal and postnatal glucose levels. Traditional statistical methods and machine learning algorithms will explore the best-performing and easily applicable prediction models. We will consider bootstrapping or K-fold cross-validation for internal model validation. If computationally difficult due to the expected large sample size, we will consider developing the model using 80% of available data and evaluating using a 20% random subset. We will consider external or temporal validation of the prediction model based on the availability of data. The prediction model’s performance will be assessed by using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration (calibration slope, calibration intercept, calibration-in-the-large and observed-to-expected ratio), model overall fit (Brier score and Cox-Snell R2) and net benefit (decision curve analysis). To examine algorithm equity, the model’s predictive performance across ethnic groups and parity will be analysed. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis-Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI) statements will be followed.
Ethics approvals have been received from Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021–179); Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (RES-22-0000-048A); the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (EO2022/5/1369); the Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee of South Australia (SA) (04-23-1056); in addition to a Site-Specific Assessment to cover the involvement of the Preventative Health SA (formerly Wellbeing SA) (2023/SSA00065). Project findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences and provided to relevant stakeholders to enable the translation of research findings into population health programmes and health policy.
The COVID-19 pandemic has made long-standing nursing workforce challenges apparent on an international scale. Decision-makers must develop multi-pronged approaches to foster the development and maintenance of a strong nursing workforce to support health systems. These approaches require attendance to recruitment and retention initiatives that show promise for stabilising the nursing workforce now and into the future.
Searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus from January 2014 up to 11 March 2024. This rapid umbrella review protocol is guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. The research question guiding this review is: what structures have healthcare systems put in place to stabilise, support and sustain the nursing workforce? This review will include existing reviews of nursing workforce initiatives with outcomes that impact nursing recruitment and retention. Results will support local health transformation including the development of a jurisdictional nursing workforce stabilisation strategy. Findings from this review will be relevant for the design, refinement and implementation of nursing workforce sustainability strategies in countries around the globe and may apply to strategies for other healthcare workers.
Institutional research ethics board exemption was received. The research team is supported by an advisory group that includes provider and patient partners. The results from this study will inform the Nursing Workforce Strategy for the province of Nova Scotia as part of a larger Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded project. They will also inform broader planning and strategy in Canada through integration with other evidence-generation activities such as comparative policy analyses and workforce planning exercises. Finally, the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Registered through Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CUJYK
Carers of people with non-memory-led dementias such as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) face unique challenges. Yet, little evidence-based support and guidance are available for this population. To address this gap in services, we have developed a novel, web-based educational programme: the Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia programme (BELIDE). BELIDE was co-designed with people with lived experience of non-memory-led dementia and a previous pilot study confirmed its feasibility as an online intervention. This protocol outlines the randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of BELIDE.
This is a parallel-group, single-blind, RCT of 238 unpaid caregivers of people diagnosed with PCA, PPA or bvFTD recruited internationally among members of the UK-based organisation Rare Dementia Support. The intervention (BELIDE programme) consists of six structured online educational modules tailored to each phenotype, a virtual onboarding session, real-life practice tasks and up to two follow-up facilitation sessions. The group receiving the intervention will be given access to the programme, while the control group will receive treatment as usual and be placed on a wait-list to receive access to the programme once they complete their participation in the trial. The allocation ratio will be 1:1 stratified by dementia diagnosis and gender. The primary outcome is reduction in caregiver depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes include stress, anxiety, self-efficacy, quality of life and caregiver-patient relationship quality. Data will be collected online via Qualtrics surveys at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months post-randomisation. A mixed-method process evaluation with a subgroup of intervention participants will explore barriers and facilitators for engagement. A health economics evaluation will also be conducted to assess cost-effectiveness. If effective, this programme could improve access to caregiver support for non-memory-led dementias by providing scalable, tailored education.
Ethical approval has been granted by University College London Research Ethics Committee (8545/007). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences, stakeholder events and open-access resources.
This trial has been registered prospectively on the Clinical Trials registry, first posted on 5 February 2024 under registration number NCT06241287.
Emergency Departments face increasing pressure due to rising patient demand, complex presentations, and resource constraints, resulting in long waits and extended stays. Nurse-initiated protocols enable nurses to commence investigations and treatments based on clinical guidelines, improving care and efficiency. Despite evidence supporting their effectiveness, few nurse-initiated protocol implementation strategies are grounded in behaviour change theory. This gap may contribute to limited uptake, as many initiatives fail to address the complex factors influencing clinician behaviour.
To develop a behaviour change theory-informed implementation strategy to enhance the uptake of nurse-initiated protocols in the emergency department.
A framework-based intervention design was used.
The Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the implementation strategy. Barriers and enablers identified through prior research in 2023 using surveys and focus groups were mapped to relevant intervention functions. Behaviour change techniques were selected based on their potential to address barriers or strengthen enablers. The APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side effects, and Equity) were applied to optimise feasibility.
Nine barriers and ten enablers to nurse-initiated protocols use were identified and categorised using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) framework and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eight intervention functions were selected and mapped to 24 behaviour change techniques and 23 delivery modes. The key implementation strategies are education, clinical champions, documentation changes, audit and feedback, and leadership engagement. Stakeholders confirmed the feasibility of the selected strategies.
Theory-informed, context-specific strategies are essential for implementing nurse-initiated protocols in emergency departments. This approach enables the design of targeted, feasible interventions that directly respond to identified barriers and enablers. Future research should test context-specific implementation strategies, assess their long-term impact on healthcare outcomes, and evaluate their scalability across diverse healthcare settings.
By targeting the behavioural determinants of clinician practice, this study fills a critical gap in implementation science within emergency nursing. This study identified 24 behaviour change techniques across eight intervention functions to support nurse-initiated protocol uptake. Strategies such as education, clinical champions, and audit provide a practical, replicable framework to overcome barriers, enhance autonomy, and reduce care delays. Findings support sustainable implementation in emergency settings, with future research needed on long-term impact and scalability.
There is no EQUATOR guideline available for this study.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore how frail older patients experience their stay and nursing care during boarding time at the emergency department.
A qualitative explorative interview study.
Purposive sampling was used, with a two-step selection process: (1) Patients 65 years or older spending at least 4 h at the emergency department waiting for a hospital bed, referred to as boarding time, were (2) screened for frailty using the FRail Elderly Support researcH group screening instrument. If screening identified a patient as frail, they were eligible for an interview. Individual semi-structured interviews (n = 19) were conducted during patients' boarding time at the emergency department. Data was collected between March and April 2019. The theoretical Fundamentals of Care framework shaped the interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive latent content analysis was performed.
The findings resulted in four main categories: Frail older patients felt disregarded, defenceless, and resigned during boarding time at the emergency department, yet also hopeful. The experience of hope resulted from confidence in the nurses, good nursing care, patience towards one's situation, and hope in emergency care.
The frail older patient experienced boarding time in the emergency department through an overarching theme: ‘being left in no-man's land in the emergency department but still feeling hopeful’. A trusting nurse–patient relationship, integrating the provision of fundamental care, is a favourable factor for the well-being of the frail older patient.
The study addressed the increased number of older adults with complex health needs, coupled with overcrowded emergency departments. Frail older patients perceive the boarding time as being left in a ‘no-man's-land’, addressing unclear information and lack of caregiver responsibility. This highlights the need for tailored guidelines and care practices that promote person-centred care and ensure safety for this vulnerable group in emergency settings.
Not applicable.
by Juliana Rodrigues Tovar Garbin, Franciéle Marabotti Costa Leite, Ana Paula Brioschi dos Santos, Larissa Soares Dell’Antonio, Cristiano Soares da Silva Dell’Antonio, Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior
A comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the epidemiological dynamics of COVID-19 across the pandemic waves—particularly in terms of disease severity and mortality—is critical for optimizing healthcare services and prioritizing high-risk populations. Here we aim to analyze the factors associated with short-term and prolonged hospitalization for COVID-19 during the first three pandemic waves. We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from individuals reported in the e-SUS-VS system who were hospitalized for COVID-19 in a state in a southeast state of Brazil. Hospitalization duration was classified as short or prolonged based on a 7-day cutoff, corresponding to the median length of hospital stay during the second pandemic wave. Bivariate analyses were performed using the chi-square test for heterogeneity. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with statistical significance set at 5%. When analyzing hospitalization duration across the three waves, we found that 51.1% (95%CI: 49.3–53) of hospitalizations in the first wave were prolonged. In contrast, short-duration hospitalizations predominated in the second (54.7%; 95% CI: 52.4–57.0) and third (51.7%; 95% CI: 50.2–53.2) waves. Factors associated with prolonged hospitalization varied by wave. During the first wave, older adults (≥60 years) (OR=1.67; 95%CI: 1.35–2.06), individuals with ≥10 symptoms (OR=2.03; 95%CI: 1.04–3.94), obese individuals (OR=2.0; 95%CI: 1.53–2.74), and those with ≥2 comorbidities (OR=2.22; 95%CI: 1.71–2.89) were more likely to experience prolonged hospitalization. In the second wave, he likelihood of extended hospital stays was higher among individuals aged ≥60 years (OR=2.04; 95%CI: 1.58–2.62) and those with ≥2 comorbidities (OR=1.77; 95%CI: 1.29–2.41). In the third wave, prolonged hospitalization was more frequent among older adults (OR=1.89; 95%CI: 1.65–2.17,), individuals with 5–9 symptoms (OR=1.52; 95%CI: 1.20–1.92), obese individuals (OR=2.2; 95%CI: 1.78–2.73), and those with comorbidities (OR=1.45; 95%CI: 1.22–1.72 and OR=2.0; 95%CI: 1.69–2.45). In conclusion, we identified variations in hospitalization patterns across the pandemic waves, although the differences were relatively subtle. These variations likely reflect gradual shifts in the risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stays. Our findings highlight t the importance of implementing targeted public health interventions, particularly those designed to reduce disease severity and improve clinical outcomes among vulnerable populations at greater risk of extended hospitalization.Delirium is one of the most common forms of acute cerebral dysfunction in critically ill children, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim was to identify studies describing or evaluating non-pharmacological interventions to prevent or treat paediatric delirium.
Scoping review.
Searches were performed in Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Journals), EMBASE and Web of Science from January 2000 to April 2023. A hand search and update were conducted on 01 June 2024.
We included studies involving critically ill children (0–18 years) in intensive care settings that examined non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention or treatment of paediatric delirium. Only empirical studies and reviews with transparent methodology were considered.
Title and abstract screening and full-text review of articles were conducted by two reviewers based on prespecified inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted relevant information from the included studies in tabular form. Extracted variables included publication year, title, author(s), country, setting, population and age, design, sample size, intervention components, outcome(s) and findings.
Nine studies were included. In total, 16 different intervention components were identified. The most frequently reported components for preventing and treating paediatric delirium were promoting mobilisation, encouraging family presence and involvement, improving sleep, and standardised instruments or checklists for underlying aetiology. Most intervention studies were before-and-after studies; overall, seven different outcomes were used. Study results regarding the effects of delirium were inconsistent.
Various non-pharmacological interventions are currently described to mitigate paediatric delirium, but the underlying evidence is limited. High-quality intervention research using relevant and comparable outcomes is needed to evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions. Despite employing a comprehensive search strategy, we must consider the possibility that relevant articles were overlooked.
FreshRSS 