Conectar
To understand the social representations of bedside milk expression (BME) among mothers of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Qualitative descriptive study.
The study was conducted from July to August 2024 in two NICUs of a referral maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Nineteen mothers of hospitalised premature newborns participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and subjected to thematic content analysis.
Mothers perceived BME as a meaningful act of protection and bonding, though some were unfamiliar with the practice. Emotional ambivalence was common, shaped by prior breastfeeding experiences and the context of prematurity. Discomfort related to privacy and shared spaces was noted. Support from healthcare professionals was essential to promote understanding and adherence.
Social representations of BME are shaped by emotional, social and institutional experiences. Anchored in prior breastfeeding experiences and cultural meanings of maternal care, the practice is objectified through both gestures of affection and tangible barriers.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive training to support mothers in BME. Structural improvements, privacy and emotional support are essential for fostering maternal autonomy and confidence.
This study highlights the barriers to BME, emphasising the role of healthcare support and the need for better infrastructure, privacy and training to enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding.
The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
None.
This paper highlights the pivotal role of healthcare professional support in overcoming barriers to BME and promoting breastfeeding practices.
Fresh breast milk is considered the gold standard for reducing complications and improving survival in preterm infants. BME is recommended as an effective strategy to ensure the availability of fresh breast milk. Mothers' social representations of this practice remain underexplored within the neonatal intensive care context.
Explores mothers' social representations of BME in NICUs, addressing a significant gap in qualitative research. Reveals how emotional, social and institutional factors shape mothers' perceptions, motivations and challenges related to BME. Highlights the need for targeted professional support, improved infrastructure and privacy to enhance maternal autonomy and adherence to milk expression practices.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive specialised training to provide technical guidance and emotional support, enhancing mothers' confidence and autonomy in BME. Improving infrastructure and ensuring privacy in NICUs are crucial to creating supportive environments that facilitate milk expression and strengthen maternal–infant bonding. Institutional policies should integrate maternal-centred strategies to support breastfeeding continuity and promote humanised neonatal care.
Numerous published case reports have described retained drug needle fragments in soft tissue as causes of localised pain and infections in persons who inject drugs (PWIDs). Furthermore, there are case reports of PWIDs with lung and heart embolisations caused by needle emboli. Subcutaneously retained needles also pose a risk of needlestick injury to medical staff. There are no previous epidemiological attempts to evaluate how common X-ray-confirmed retained drug needle fragments are among community-dwelling PWIDs. Due to the unclear clinical relevance of needle fragment retentions, there is a need to systematically evaluate the prevalence of retained needles, related complications and risk factors predisposing needle fragmentations.
We have planned a prospective cross-sectional study covering multiple ambulatory clinics that manage PWIDs in Tampere, Finland. PWIDs will be asked to give their written informed consent prior to any study procedures. Initially, we aim to recruit a sample for a pilot study of 20 adults (≥18 years) who will be asked to fill out a questionnaire related to their drug use history and their suspicions of having retained needle fragments. Subsequently, participants will undergo X-ray imaging of the injection sites as part of the study. Female participants of childbearing age (
We submitted the study protocol for ethics review to the Tampere University Hospital Ethics Committee and received their favourable opinion (study code: R22037). We subsequently sought organisational permission from the clinics to conduct the study. To be enrolled, PWIDs must provide written informed consent. The study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.
To identify and compare the digital competence profiles of nurse educators, the background variables associated with profiles, and the self-assessed level of digital competence in four European countries.
A descriptive comparative cross-sectional study.
Data were collected from nurse educators (n = 263) in 36 nursing education organisations in Finland, Malta, Slovakia and Spain. Partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering was used to identify competence groups, and descriptive and inferential statistics were used to examine the association of nurse educators' background variables.
The clustering analysis resulted in two nurse educator digital competence profile groups: high and moderate. The profiles differed based on completed pedagogical studies and teaching experience, with an emphasis on the high competence profile. Educators in the high competence profile group showed greater interest in using educational technology and self assessed their digital competence at a higher level compared to educators in the moderate competence profile group. Nurse educators' lowest digital competence was in the safe and responsible use of technology, such as knowing copyright laws.
Despite the heterogeneous background of nurse educators, international continuing professional development needs in digital competence are identified. Nurse educators' continuing education should support the utilisation of technology through pedagogical approaches, and educators' competence in the safe and responsible use of technology (e.g., how to protect digital materials) must be enhanced in nursing education organisations.
This study highlights the need to further develop nurse educators' digital competence. Continuing professional development should target preparation in safe and responsible technology use and include pedagogical studies and mentoring from experienced peers.
The STROBE checklist was adhered to in reporting the results.
Each participating educational organisation assigned a contact person to distribute the survey to the nurse educators.
To explore the experience of primary healthcare (PHC) professionals in their professional role during the pandemic and to describe collective coping strategies.
We conducted a qualitative study using interviews, focus groups and photovoice techniques from February to September 2021. The qualitative data were transcribed, aggregated and analysed, from a hermeneutic perspective, using applied thematic analysis and ethnographic approaches.
Primary Care Health Madrid region (Spain).
Convenience sampling was used to select 71 multidisciplinary primary care professionals who were working in 12 PHCs representing diverse socioeconomic, social vulnerability and COVID impact levels in the Madrid region (Spain).
Findings from this study show how lack of protection in the early days, uncertainty about how the disease would evolve and the daily challenges they faced have had an impact on the participants’ perceptions of their professional role. Nuanced differences in impact were found between men and women, age groups, professional roles and territories. The questioning of the basic foundations of primary care and the lack of prospects led to a feeling of demotivation. They perceive a wide gap between their levels of involvement and commitment, the recognition they receive and the attention to resources they need to do their work to a high standard. The support of their colleagues was seen as the most valuable resource for coping with the crisis.
The practitioners’ discourses offer knowledge that could help to face new global health threats; they also identify an urgent need to restore the role and motivation of PHC professionals as part of a wider regeneration of health systems.
Children with upper limb loss or difference (ULLD) require individualised and developmentally appropriate clinical care. To guide this specialised care, outcome measures can be used to assess important constructs, such as physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with medical treatments and services. However, there is limited research available on which outcome measures are used to assess these constructs and whether they have been psychometrically assessed in children with ULLD who may or may not use a prosthesis. Thus, the purpose of this scoping review is (1) to determine which outcome measures are used to assess physical function, HRQoL and satisfaction in paediatric patients with ULLD and (2) to identify articles that include children with ULLD in psychometric assessments of these outcome measures. Findings of these studies will be reported. This review will inform healthcare professionals on which outcome measures assessing function, HRQoL and satisfaction have been psychometrically tested for use in children with ULLD. It will also inform future research on outcome measurement in this population.
A two-phase scoping review will be conducted in which PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL will be searched: first, to identify which outcome measures are used to assess physical function, HRQoL and satisfaction in children with ULLD and, second, to determine whether those measures have been psychometrically assessed for use in this population. Teams of two reviewers will review articles for eligibility and extract information from eligible articles. Tie-breaking will be conducted by a third reviewer. Narrative summaries will be used to describe the findings of this scoping review.
No ethical approval is needed. The results of the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.
The scoping review that applies this protocol has been registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UGWB).
This study aimed to assess high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (HPV 16/18) and its determinants among women in East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.
An institutional-based cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted among 337 women screened for cervical cancer in two hospitals in East Gojjam Zone from February to April 2021 gregoriean calander.
The prevalence of HPV infection was 14.2% (95% CI: 10.7% to 18.1%). The mean age of the respondents was 36.7±9.1 years. Women in the age group of 55–65 years (adjusted OR (AOR)=7.91, 95% CI: 1.95 to 32.09), early initiation of sexual intercourse (AOR=5.36, 95% CI: 1.58 to 18.13), history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) (AOR=3.52, 95% CI: 1.27 to 9.72), HIV positive status (AOR=6.8, 95% CI: 1.99 to 23.54) and number of lifetime sexual partners (AOR=4.37, 95% CI: 1.15 to 17.3) were important independent factors associated with the presence of oncogenic HPV infection.
We found a relatively low prevalence of high-risk HPV infection. Age, early initiation of sexual intercourse at less than 18 years, history of STI, being HIV seropositive and multiple sexual partners were important factors for high-risk HPV infection. Women aged >46 years, women with early initiation of sex, a history of STI, being HIV positive and a history of multiple sexual partners should be encouraged to be screened and vaccinated for HPV infection. Wider-ranging studies are also needed in HPV-infected women in association with the cervical lesion.
To explore the perspectives and experiences of maternity care providers regarding obstetric violence across low-, middle-, and high-income countries.
An integrative review of the literature.
A systematic literature search in CINAHL, Medline (via Ovid), SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from 2014 to 2024. Further papers were identified through a review of the reference lists of identified studies and through email alerts from searched databases. Articles were appraised using the applicable Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative or cross-sectional critical appraisal tool.
Title and abstract screen were undertaken on 2748 records. Fifty-four studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs were included. Maternity providers across all socio-economic levels described witnessing, and/or involvement in both respectful care and incidents of obstetric violence. The most common forms of obstetric violence were verbal and physical abuse, coercion, unconsented and unnecessary interventions, and violations of privacy and autonomy. Women who were socially marginalised, impoverished, and illiterate were vulnerable to obstetric violence. Differences were noted between low- and high-income countries, with detention of women for non-payment, privacy violations due to building design and lack of space, mistreatment due to HIV status, and women who were considered non-compliant being more vulnerable to obstetric violence in low-and low-middle-income countries. Obstetric violence was justified and normalised in the name of saving the baby, with less focus on the psychological health of the mother.
Our findings demonstrate that obstetric violence is a gender-based violence enabled through patriarchal structures and power imbalances. Maternity providers are witnessing or enacting obstetric violence across low-, middle- and high-income countries, with significant impacts on women and maternity care providers alike. This review highlights opportunities for further research and action to develop health and legal frameworks to prevent instances of obstetric violence and improve outcomes for women and maternity care providers.
A woman-centred approach underpinned by respectful maternity care has benefits for pregnant and birthing women. Obstetric violence, including verbal and physical abuse, coercion, and overmedicalisation, is prevalent in maternity services globally. This integrative review explored the perspectives and experiences of maternity care providers regarding obstetric violence across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. This review highlights the similarities and differences of witnessed, enacted, and perceived obstetric violence from the experience of maternity care providers. This review identifies the covert and overt nature of obstetric violence across low-, middle- and high-income countries. Gaining insight into provider perspectives across low-, middle-, and high-income countries may inform policy and practice reforms to eliminate obstetric violence and advance the provision of respectful maternity care.
This integrative review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
Drug-related problems (DRPs) associated with oral anticancer drugs are frequent and require a new healthcare organisation to manage them on an outpatient basis. The aim of this article is to present the study protocol of the Drug Related problems in Oncology Practice (DROP) randomised controlled trial (RCT), endorsed by the French Society for Oncology Pharmacy. The main objective of the DROP RCT is to measure the impact at 6 months of the DROP community/hospital pharmaceutical intervention programme, compared with usual treatment, on the mean number of DRP (ie, adverse effects, drug–drug interactions, medication errors) related to oral anticancer drugs in at-risk outpatients.
The DROP protocol is a prospective, multicentre controlled clinical trial, with individual randomisation, comparing in parallel and in open, two groups of outpatients treated with oral anticancer drugs. The interventional group benefits from the DROP multidisciplinary intervention on oral anticancer treatment. The control group receives usual care. The primary outcome of the DROP RCT is the number of DRP due to oral anticancer drugs, per patient, identified between the inclusion of the patient and 6 months after inclusion
Approval to conduct this study was obtained for all participating centres from an Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Méditerranée V) in August 2018 in accordance with French law. The trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03257969, recruitment started in June 2019. The current protocol version is V.9, 13 December 2023.
To explore the experiences of new graduate registered nurses in caring for the deteriorating patient in rural areas.
New graduate registered nurses often feel unprepared to care for the deteriorating patient. Whilst literature has recognised new graduate registered nurses working within metropolitan areas feel ill-equipped to care for deteriorating patients, there is a paucity of literature focused on experiences within the rural context.
Qualitative, descriptive phenomenological approach.
In-depth interviews were undertaken with 7 participants in rural Eastern Australia with collected data being subject to thematic analysis.
Three themes were identified that shares the lived experiences of the participants as they transitioned into the rural team: First encounters—Transition to the rural team; Practice support for managing deterioration; and The road to confidence.
New graduate registered nurses are unprepared to care for the deteriorating patient in rural areas. Practice support and barriers to ongoing education are influential on their experience with findings from this study supporting focused rural healthcare preparation from tertiary education providers, plus structured practice support from senior rural nurses and health facility orientation programs. Preparation should include the use of digital technologies and escalation and management of the deteriorating patient alongside rural policies and procedures to enhance patient safety and support new graduate rural nurses.
The findings have implications for tertiary undergraduate nursing education and those supporting New Graduate Registered Nurses in their transition to practice in rural areas. Enhancement of new graduate nurses' skills and abilities in recognition and responding to patient deterioration through both technological and personnel support will enhance patient safety within rural health care.
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
7 participants were involved in the study.
International eHealth strategies incorporate the adoption of electronic health records to enhance the delivery of integrated healthcare and improve patient outcomes. Nurses’ acceptance of electronic health records is crucial for their successful implementation.
To synthesise evidence from empirical studies to explore the nurses' perceptions of facilitators and barriers and the influence of moderating factors on their acceptance of electronic health records.
A convergent integrated mixed-method systematic review following the JBI methodology.
CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Medline [EBSCO], ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Open Grey were searched on 28 March 2023 for primary research studies published between 2018 and 2023.
Studies were screened by two independent reviewers adhering to predetermined inclusion criteria. A convergent integrated synthesis was conducted and deductive analysis was framed by The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model.
Thirteen studies were included and appraised using the mixed-method appraisal tool. Facilitators of nurses' acceptance of electronic health records included increased efficiency, improved access to information, management support and training. Nurses identified increased documentation burden, threats to patient confidentiality, difficult navigation and inadequate IT support and training as barriers to their acceptance. The influence of moderators on nurses' acceptance of electronic health records remains unclear.
This review provides insights into nurses' perceptions of factors influencing electronic health record acceptance. Addressing these issues during adoption and further exploring the impact of moderators can improve acceptance and minimise unintended consequences.
Nurse leaders are key in empowering nurses to accept electronic health records. The nursing profession must participate in all phases of electronic health record design and implementation to ensure that they complement nursing practice.
PRISMA 2020 Statement.
This is a review of primary research.
Dashboards display hospital quality and patient safety measures aimed to improve patient outcomes. Although literature establishes dashboards aid quality and performance improvement initiatives, research is limited from the frontline nurse manager's perspective. This study characterizes factors influencing hospital nurse managers' use of dashboards for unit-level quality and performance improvement with suggestions for dashboard design. Using a descriptive qualitative design, semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 hospital nurse managers from a health system in the Midwestern United States. Thematic analysis was used to describe four perceived factors influencing dashboard use: external, data, technology features, and personal. External factors included regulatory standards, professional standards of care, organizational expectations, and organizational resources. Data factors included dashboard data quality and usefulness. Technology features included preference for simple, interactive, and customizable visual displays. Personal factors included inherent nurse manager qualities and knowledge. Guidelines for dashboard design involve display of required relevant quality measures that are accurate, timely, useful, and usable. Future research should involve hospital nurse managers in user-centered design to ensure dashboards are favorable for use. Further, opportunities exist for nurse manager informatics training and education on dashboard use in preparation for their role and responsibilities in unit-level quality and performance improvement. by Féline E. V. Scheijmans, Roosmarijn van der Wal, Margot L. Zomers, Johannes J. M. van Delden, W. Ludo van der Pol, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel
ObjectivesSolidarity-based healthcare systems are being challenged by the incremental costs of new and expensive medicines for cancer and rare diseases. To regulate reimbursement of such drugs, the Dutch government introduced a policy instrument known as the Coverage Lock (CL) in 2015. Little is known about the public opinion regarding such policy instruments and their consequences, i.e., reimbursement of some, but not all, expensive medicines. We aimed to identify the preferences of Dutch citizens regarding the reimbursement of expensive medicines, and to investigate the views of the public on the use of the CL as a healthcare policy instrument and their input for improvement.
MethodsWeb-based survey of a representative sample of 1999 Dutch citizens aged 18 years and older (panel of research company Kantar Public). Potential respondents were approached via e-mail. Several policy measures, real-life cases and statements related to the CL were presented in the survey to respondents. Their responses were analysed by tabulating descriptive statistics (proportions and percentages).
Results1179 individuals (response rate 59%) filled in the questionnaire. Although a majority considered the CL policy unjustified, they preferred it to the alternative policy measures that were presented. In four real-life case descriptions of patients in need of expensive medicines, respondents most often indicated effectiveness, lack of availability of alternative treatment and improved quality of life due to treatment as reasons for a positive reimbursement decision. An unfavourable cost-benefit ratio was their main reason to be against reimbursement. Some argued that withholding reimbursement was a way of informing manufacturers that extremely high prices are unacceptable.
ConclusionThere is public support for patients in need of expensive medicine. Many respondents supported the CL as a reimbursement policy. However, there is a wish to optimize the interpretation of the assessment criteria and the weight these are attributed in decision making about reimbursement of expensive innovative medicine for patients.
by Mulat Belay Simegn, Werkneh Melkie Tilahun, Elyas Melaku Mazengia, Aysheshim Belaineh Haimanot, Anteneh Lamesgen Mneneh, Muluye Gebrie Mengie, Bekalu Endalew, Molla Yigzaw Birhanu, Tigabu Kidie Tesfie, Lakew Asmare, Habtamu Geremew
IntroductionGrowth monitoring and promotion services are strategies to promote child health and reduce child mortality. Even though Ethiopia is attempting different strategies to cope with the low rate of GMP utilization, the problem is still unresolved.
ObjectiveDetermine the pooled proportion of GMP utilization and its contributing factors among children less than two years in Ethiopia.
MethodThe review protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42023472746. The PRISMA-2020 statement guided the conduct of this review. Electronic databases and grey literature were used. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2. Subgroup analysis was conducted. The random effect model was used to summarize the pooled effect sizes with their respective 95% CI with STATA version 17. To test the small study effect, the funnel plot and Egger’s test were applied.
ResultA total of seven (7) studies with 4027 participants were considered in this meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of GMP utilization reported by seven studies was 25.71% (95%CI: 24.39, 27.04). ANC follow-up (AOR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.47, 2.76), PNC follow-up (AOR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.49), counseling (AOR = 2.88; 95% CI: 2.09, 3.68), maternal education (AOR = 2.89; 95% CI: 1.66, 4.13), paternal education (AOR = 3.78; 95% CI: 2.25, 5.32), family health card (AOR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.67, 2.96), and mothers good knowledge towards GMP (AOR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.72, 4.07) variables were positively associated with GMP service utilization.
Conclusion and recommendationThe pooled proportion of GMP remains low in Ethiopia. ANC and PNC follow-up, counseling, maternal and paternal education, family health cards, maternal knowledge towards GMP were significantly associated. Findings are essential for evidence-based policy making, intervention, and input for ongoing research.
by Lilah M. Besser, Sarah N. Forrester, Milla Arabadjian, Michael P. Bancks, Margaret Culkin, Kathleen M. Hayden, Elaine T. Le, Isabelle Pierre-Louis, Jana A. Hirsch
BackgroundResearchers have increasingly recognized the importance of structural and social determinants of health (SSDOH) as key drivers of a multitude of diseases and health outcomes. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is an ongoing, longitudinal cohort study of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) that has followed geographically and racially/ethnically diverse participants starting in 2000. Since its inception, MESA has incorporated numerous SSDOH assessments and instruments to study in relation to CVD and aging outcomes. In this paper, we describe the SSDOH data available in MESA, systematically review published papers using MESA that were focused on SSDOH and provide a roadmap for future SSDOH-related studies.
Methods and findingsThe study team reviewed all published papers using MESA data (n = 2,125) through January 23, 2023. Two individuals systematically reviewed titles, abstracts, and full text to determine the final number of papers (n = 431) that focused on at least one SSDOH variable as an exposure, outcome, or stratifying/effect modifier variable of main interest (discrepancies resolved by a third individual). Fifty-seven percent of the papers focused on racialized/ethnic groups or other macrosocial/structural factors (e.g., segregation), 16% focused on individual-level inequalities (e.g. income), 14% focused on the built environment (e.g., walking destinations), 10% focused on social context (e.g., neighborhood socioeconomic status), 34% focused on stressors (e.g., discrimination, air pollution), and 4% focused on social support/integration (e.g., social participation). Forty-seven (11%) of the papers combined MESA with other cohorts for cross-cohort comparisons and replication/validation (e.g., validating algorithms).
ConclusionsOverall, MESA has made significant contributions to the field and the published literature, with 20% of its published papers focused on SSDOH. Future SSDOH studies using MESA would benefit by using recently added instruments/data (e.g., early life educational quality), linking SSDOH to biomarkers to determine underlying causal mechanisms linking SSDOH to CVD and aging outcomes, and by focusing on intersectionality, understudied SSDOH (i.e., social support, social context), and understudied outcomes in relation to SSDOH (i.e., sleep, respiratory health, cognition/dementia).
To summarise the evidence and present the state of the science on pressure injury care bundles in the community. Specifically, this review examined (i) the extent of pressure injury by studying its prevalence and incidence in the last 10 years, (ii) the risk factors associated with community-acquired pressure injury and (iii) the components and outcomes associated with effective pressure injury care bundles in the community.
PI care bundles have effectively reduced PI rates; however, there is limited evidence of care bundles used in community settings.
Integrative review.
This integrative review is guided by the Whittemore and Knafl framework and follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Quality appraisal was applied to assess the quality of selected articles. Data relevant to the review aims were extracted, and findings were synthesised and presented. PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched. Studies published in the English language between 2012 and 2022 were retrieved.
A total of 89 articles were retrieved; 25 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported the point prevalence and period prevalence of community-acquired pressure injuries, and only one study reported the incidence of community-acquired pressure injuries. The point prevalence and period prevalence of community-acquired pressure injury were 0.02% to 10.8% and 2.7% to 86.4%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence was 1.3%. The risk factors for community-acquired pressure injury assessed vary between studies; older age, poor nutrition, immobility and multiple comorbidities are commonly reported. Socioeconomic and caregiving factors were not studied. Very few studies evaluated pressure injury care bundles in the community. Even so, the components of the pressure injury care bundle vary between studies.
Pressure injury development is associated with a complex interplay of factors. Socioeconomic and caregiving factors were not examined in any of the papers. There is a lack of understanding of the components and outcomes associated with effective pressure injury care bundles in the community.
Despite their prevalence, community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPIs) are often underreported due to inadequate follow-up and reporting mechanisms. Although the risk factors for CAPIs vary across studies, older age, impaired mobility, multiple comorbidities and malnutrition consistently emerge as key contributors. Pressure injury preventive care bundles are more commonly used in the acute care setting rather than the community setting.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
This study aims to describe the experiences of women with gynaecological cancer regarding family-oriented care (FOC) and how they rated their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a 15D instrument (15D©).
A cross-sectional mixed-method study.
The data were collected by electronic surveys of two Finnish cancer associations from gynaecological cancer patients (n = 53). The qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. The HRQoL answers were analysed statistically using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27).
The results emphasized that FOC is not yet part of the care process. Furthermore, comprehensive encounters are lacking, and the experience of being a woman is forgotten during the care process. The results of the HRQoL analysis suggest that distress and the discomfort and symptoms of cancer patients are perceived as significant factors affecting their quality of life during different phases of treatment. Family status also has an impact on perceived quality of life, whereby those living alone gave worse ratings for the depression and vitality dimensions.
In part, the quantitative and qualitative data supported each other, but the descriptions provided a more comprehensive view of issues that affect women in a more multidimensional way, such as sexual health issues. More research on the effectiveness of FOC is needed to develop the capacity for effective healthcare.
This study was able to identify important areas for improvement in clinical practice from the perspective of patients and their families.
This study was prepared and reported according to the STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
No abstract available Evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) enables consistent and effective healthcare that prioritises patient safety. The competencies of advanced practice nurses (APNs) are essential for implementing EBHC because their professional duties include promoting EBHC.
To identify, critically appraise, and synthesise the best available evidence concerning the EBHC competence of APNs and associated factors.
A systematic review.
CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Medic, ProQuest, and MedNar.
Databases were searched for studies (until 19 September 2023) that examined the EBHC competence and associated factors of APNs were included. Quantitative studies published in English, Swedish and Finnish were included. We followed the JBI methodology for systematic review and performed a narrative synthesis.
The review included 12 quantitative studies, using 15 different instruments, and involved 3163 participants. The quality of the studies was fair. The APNs' EBHC competence areas were categorised into five segments according to the JBI EBHC model. The strongest areas of competencies were in global health as a goal, transferring and implementing evidence, while the weakest were generating and synthesising evidence. Evidence on factors influencing APNs' EBHC competencies was contradictory, but higher levels of education and the presence of an organisational research council may be positively associated with APNs' EBHC competencies.
The development of EBHC competencies for APNs should prioritise evidence generation and synthesis. Elevating the education level of APNs and establishing a Research Council within the organisation can potentially enhance the EBHC competence of APNs.
We should consider weaknesses in EBHC competence when developing education and practical exercises for APNs. This approach will promote the development of APNs' EBHC competence and EBHC implementation in nursing practice.
The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021226578), and reporting followed the PRISMA checklist.
None.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multi-disciplinary diabetic limb salvage programme in improving clinical outcomes and optimising healthcare utilisation in 406 patients aged ≥80 years with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), compared to 2392 younger patients enrolled from June 2020 to June 2021 and against 1716 historical controls using one-to-one propensity score matching. Results showed that elderly programme patients had lower odds of amputation-free survival (odds ratio: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.88) and shorter cumulative length of stay (LOS) compared to younger programme patients (incidence rate ratio: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.69). Compared to the matched controls, participating in the programme was associated with 5% higher probability of minor lower extremity amputation, reduced inpatient admissions and emergency visits, shorter LOS but increased specialist and primary care visits (all p-values <0.05). The findings suggest that the programme yielded favourable impacts on the clinical outcomes of patients aged≥80 years with DFUs. Further research is needed to develop specific interventions tailoring to the needs of the elderly population and to determine their effectiveness on patient outcomes while accounting for potential confounding factors.
The cumulative stress toll on nurses increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evidence-based practice (EBP) project was conducted to understand what is known about the impacts of cumulative stress within nursing and if there are ways to mitigate stress during a nurse's shift.
A project team from three clinical units completed an extensive literature review and identified the need to promote detachment while supporting parasympathetic recovery. Based on this review, leaders from three pediatric clinical units (neonatal intensive care unit, cardiovascular intensive care unit, and acute pulmonary floor) implemented respite rooms.
Follow-up outcomes showed a statistically significant stress reduction. For all shifts combined, the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test revealed that perceived stress scores from an 11-point Likert scale (0 = no stress and 10 = maximum perceived stress) were significantly lower in the post-respite room (Md = 3, n = 68) compared to in the pre-respite room (Md = 6, n = 68), Z = −7.059, p < .001, with a large effect size, r = .605. Nurses and other staff frequently utilized respite rooms during shifts.
Clinical inquiry and evidence-based practice processes can mitigate cumulative stress and support staff wellbeing. Respite rooms within the hospital can promote a healthy work environment among nurses and promote a self-care culture change. Evidence-based strategies to mitigate cumulative stress using respite rooms are a best practice to promote nurse wellbeing and mitigate cumulative stress.
FreshRSS 