Conectar
To review the evidence on the experiences and perceptions of culturally and linguistically diverse informal carers supporting older adults during transitions from hospital to home, including their interactions with transitional care interventions.
Scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, AMED, PsycINFO, Global Health, Social Work Abstracts, JBI EBP, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest and Informit for studies published between January 2010 and November 2024.
Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Analysis followed the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for Practice and Research recommendations framework.
Seventeen studies involving 1275 carers were included. Carer experiences were summarised into four themes: (1) cultural and communication barriers; (2) role ambiguity and practical challenges; (3) limited involvement in discharge planning and (4) barriers to accessing support and services. Perceptions of transitional care interventions were mixed. While some interventions improved carer preparedness and reduced stress, most lacked cultural tailoring and did not address carers' psychosocial and communication needs.
Culturally and linguistically diverse informal carers face challenges navigating transitional care. While involving them in care planning improves outcomes, implementation remains inconsistent. Emotional support and culturally tailored services are insufficient.
There is a need for culturally and linguistically tailored transitional care programmes that prioritise carer education and communication support. Key areas for improvement include: (1) health literacy and system navigation; (2) involvement in care planning; (3) communication with providers; (4) psychosocial and emotional support and (5) culturally appropriate services. Future research should explore the unique emotional and psychosocial needs of these carers to inform targeted support strategies.
This review follows the PRISMA guideline for reporting.
No patient or public contribution.
Though prior trials have shown the effectiveness of community-based hypertension detection and care delivery models, their adoption and translation to practice has been slow. In this study, we will develop and test strategies for the implementation and scale-up of a proven multicomponent hypertension intervention (MCHI) in Pakistan that comprises health education, blood pressure (BP) monitoring and referrals by lady health workers (LHWs) and hypertension management by physicians in primary care settings.
In this 24-month hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness cluster-randomised controlled trial, we will recruit 3000 adult hypertensive patients from two rural districts of Pakistan. We will engage public health sector managers, physicians and LHWs and use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an already proven-to-be-effective MCHI. Using Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change and the modified Delphi technique, a set of implementation strategies addressing barriers will be identified. The strategies will be categorised as level 1 (requiring a change in processes), level 2 (requiring a change in infrastructure) and level 3 (financial restructuring). Basic health units and 250–300 households from their catchment will be considered as clusters. Clusters will be randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to intervention and control. While MCHI will be offered in both trial arms (intervention and control), the aforementioned implementation strategies will be randomised to the intervention arm only, starting with level 1 and moving to levels 2 and 3 as needed. Baseline and 6-monthly follow-up surveys, each of 6 months duration, will be conducted to collect data from the recruited participants on sociodemographics, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, CVD-related expenses and quality of life. The primary outcome will be the mean difference in BP-lowering medications per participant between the intervention and control arms. The primary outcome will be analysed using a linear mixed model with fixed effects for baseline value of the outcome. Additional outcomes include implementation outcomes: proportion of LHWs conducting health education, BP screening and monitoring, facility referrals and proportion of physicians diagnosing and treating hypertensive patients; effectiveness outcomes: proportion of participants with controlled BP and improved EQ-5D-5L score.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of Aga Khan University Pakistan (ERC # 2023-9084-26739). Findings will be reported to: (1) study participants; (2) funding body and institutes collaborating and supporting the study; (3) provincial and district health departments to inform policy; (4) presented at local, national and international conferences and (5) disseminated by peer-review publications
Thousands of patients with mental illness are admitted to acute adult mental health wards every year in England, where local guidance recommends that all mental health settings be entirely smokefree. Mental health Trusts presently invest substantial effort and resources to implement smoke-free policies and to deliver tobacco dependence treatment to patients. Providing adequate support can help those who smoke remain abstinent or quit smoking during their smoke-free inpatient stay and beyond. At present, little is known about how best to support patients to prevent their return to pre-admission smoking behaviours after discharge from a smoke-free mental health inpatient stay. We have developed an intervention which includes targeted resources to support smoking-related behaviour change in patients following discharge from a smoke-free mental health setting. The aim of this trial is to determine the feasibility of a large-scale clinical trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SCEPTRE intervention, compared with usual care.
This feasibility study will be an individually randomised, controlled trial in eight National Health Service mental health Trusts recruiting adults (≥18 years) admitted to an acute adult mental health inpatient setting who smoke tobacco on admission, or at any point during their inpatient stay. Consenting participants will be randomised to receive a 12-week intervention consisting of components aimed at promoting or maintaining positive smoking-related behaviour change following discharge from a smoke-free mental health inpatient setting or usual care. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months and a second timepoint between 4 and 6 months post-randomisation. With 64 participants (32 in each group), the trial will allow a participation rate of 15% and completion rate of 80% to be estimated within a 95% CI of ±3% and ±10%, respectively. The analysis will be descriptive and follow a prespecified plan.
Ethics approval was obtained from the North West—Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee. We will share results widely through local, national and international academic, clinical and patient and public involvement networks. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals and will be published on the trial website: https://sceptreresearch.com/.
People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) have complex physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs following diagnosis and poorer health-related quality of life than the general population. Holistic assessment and care delivery incorporating person-centred principles is required to address these needs. This protocol describes a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) and process evaluation to evaluate the effectiveness of the extra community-based enhanced care intervention (ExtraCECI) to improve the quality of life and person-centred outcomes for PLWHA in Ghana.
This cRCT will randomly assign 26 recruited HIV clinics using 1:1 allocation to either ExtraCECI intervention or standard HIV care, with each clinic recruiting an average of 25 participants, that is, 650 in total. Eligible participants are adult PLWHA aged at least 18 years and in HIV care for at least 6 months, with cognitive ability to consent as guided by the Mental Capacity Act, clinically well to participate, attending an outpatient clinic. Healthcare professionals (HCP) at clinics randomised to the ExtraCECI intervention arm will receive training on person-centred care and holistic assessment of PLWHA in the domains of physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being. PLWHA will be empowered to contribute to their care decisions including HCP using telehealth for ExtraCECI delivery with ongoing mentorship, while participants in the Standard HIV Care arm continue with usual care. The primary outcome is quality of life measured at the individual level using Medical Outcomes Study-HIV (MOS-HIV). The primary analysis will compare MOS-HIV total scores between groups using repeated measure linear mixed model and adjusting for important baseline characteristics (including stratification factors) and random effect of clinic. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the ExtraCECI intervention, and a process evaluation will be conducted.
This protocol was approved by Edinburgh Napier University School of Health and Social Care Research Integrity Committee (REF: SHSC3681836) and the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC:010/07/24). Results from this study whether positive or negative will be presented to participating sites, communities, at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Nurses play an essential role in responding to severe viral disease which bring considerable challenges to their personal and professional well-being. This subsequently can affect the delivery of care and healthcare systems' organisational capacity to respond. Understanding nurses' experiences of these challenges will help inform healthcare policies.
To explore the experiences and coping strategies of nurses caring for patients during severe viral disease pandemics.
A mixed-methods systematic review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology.
A mixed-methods systematic review. Five electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, ASSIA and Scopus were searched on 4th April 2021. Results were reported in accordance with PRISMA. The findings were analysed and reported in the context of the Self-Regulatory Common-Sense Model.
In total, 71 peer-review primary research articles describing nurses' experiences of caring for patients during SARS, MERS, Swine flu H1N1, Avian influenza or SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 published in English from 2003 to 2021 were included. We found links between nurses' perception of the health threats, their emotional reactions, and coping strategies. Perceived health threats were influenced by organisational factors including frequent changes in clinical guidelines and workplace protocols, onerous workloads and working hours, unavailability of PPE, and lack of knowledge and training in pandemic management. These impacted nurses' physical, psychological and social well-being. Nurses also reported helpful and unhelpful coping strategies to manage the health threats.
It is vital for stakeholders, policymakers, government and healthcare institutions to recognise and monitor the wider impact on healthcare workers from health emergencies. In addition, support to develop and implement effective systems and individual mechanisms to offset the anticipated impact pre and post pandemics/epidemics is needed. Our findings can inform those strategies for similar future health emergencies.
Nurses are often the first point of contact in providing direct care to patients, hence they are at high risk of being infected. The findings from this review can help managers and policymakers in developing programmes to enhance resilience in the nursing workforce.
This was a literature review study.
FreshRSS 