by Naoki Segi, Hiroaki Nakashima, Ryotaro Oishi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Yasuhiro Nagatani, Taisuke Seki, Yasuhiko Takegami, Shinya Ishizuka, Yukiharu Hasegawa, Shiro Imagama
BackgroundCentral sensitization is an important factor associated with impaired health-related quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal disorders and community-dwelling older adults. However, health-related quality-of-life domains strongly associated with central sensitization in the general population remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores and health-related quality of life using community health checkup data.
MethodsA total of 419 middle-aged and older adults (mean age, 64.4 ± 11.2 years; 59.4% female) were included. Participants completed a questionnaire survey on pain, including visual analogue scales (VASs) for lower-back and knee pain, and the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A. Additionally, participants completed the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey, and three component-summary scores and eight subscales were calculated. Additionally, participants completed the 5-level EuroQol 5 dimensions, and health-state utility values were calculated. The correlation between the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores and these health-related quality-of-life measures was investigated.
ResultsCentral Sensitization Inventory Part A score ≥40 was observed in 2.6% participants. Significant moderate negative correlations were observed between the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores and EuroQol 5 dimensions health-state utility values (r = −0.631, P r = −0.550, P r = −0.556, P r = −0.556, P r = −0.610, P r = −0.556, P Conclusions
In community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults, Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores were negatively correlated with health-related quality-of-life scores, even in participants with Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores
Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is often required for patients with pancreatic cancer accompanied by biliary obstruction to ensure the safe administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or to manage cholangitis and jaundice. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard approach for PBD, it carries a significant risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), particularly via hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), offers a promising alternative that avoids papillary manipulation. However, the clinical utility of EUS-BD as primary drainage for PBD remains unclear due to a lack of prospective studies. This multicentre prospective trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-HGS as primary drainage for PBD in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
This multicentre prospective study involves seven institutions in Japan. Eligible patients will undergo EUS-HGS using a 7Fr plastic stent. The primary endpoint is clinical success, defined by improvements in bilirubin or liver enzyme levels within 14 days postprocedure. Secondary endpoints include technical success rate, adverse event incidence, stent patency and surgical outcomes. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled, considering an expected clinical success rate of 90% and a 10% dropout allowance.
This study has been approved by the National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (Research No. 2024-084). The results of this study will be reported at an international conference and published in an international peer-reviewed journal.
UMIN ID: 000055173.