Conectar
Paediatric hospitalisation, encompassing the period from admission to discharge, often involves feelings of pain, fear and anxiety, primarily due to clinical diagnoses and, more significantly, discomfort and stress-inducing procedures. Numerous methodologies and interventions have been investigated and implemented to alleviate these phenomena during paediatric hospitalisation. Virtual reality (VR), for example, has demonstrated efficacy in pain relief for hospitalised children in recent studies. This systematic review, therefore, aims to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of VR in alleviating pain, fear and anxiety in hospitalised children undergoing painful procedures.
This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols guidelines. A systematic search will be conducted in March and April 2025 across the following databases, with no restrictions on language or publication year: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies will include randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials involving children (aged 2–10 years) and adolescents (aged 10–18 years) who received VR interventions during painful procedures. Data will be managed and analysed using Review Manager software (RevMan 5.2.3). In cases of significant heterogeneity (I² > 50%), a random-effects model will be employed to combine studies and calculate the OR with a 95% CI. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.
This study will solely review published data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This systematic review is expected to provide subsidies, evidence and insights into the use of VR. It is also anticipated that the results will directly impact the improvement of care for these patients and the qualification of professional care.
CRD42024568297.
Acute pain in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery is mostly treated with opioid analgesics. However, with the risk of adverse reactions and complications, strategies which do not involve opioid analgesics can be considered, such as aromatherapy. This systematic review aims to analyse the effectiveness of aromatherapy in relieving pain in post-cardiac surgery patients.
Two researchers will independently and simultaneously conduct searches and select studies from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (Library) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.com), with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials on the use of aromatherapy for pain relief in postcardiac surgery patients will be included. Then, two researchers will independently examine the studies based on inclusion criteria, extract data from the included studies and assess the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool from Cochrane. Data will be synthesised using Review Manager software. The strength of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The literature search, study selection, review and meta-analysis stages will be conducted from early October 2025 to April 2026.
This study is based on secondary data, and therefore ethical approval from a research ethics committee was not required. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
CRD42024568532.
Approximately 25% of the Brazilian population suffers from mental disorders, a prevalence exacerbated by systemic and cultural factors such as socioeconomic inequalities, underfunded mental health services, regional disparities, and persistent stigma. These conditions significantly impact hospital care. Nurses, due to their direct contact with these patients, face challenges ranging from managing physical conditions to handling verbal aggression and psychiatric crises. This study aimed to assess the scientific evidence regarding nursing care for hospitalized patients with psychiatric disorders.
A systematic review with a mixed-methods approach was conducted, registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42022359288) and guided by PRISMA standards. Databases, such as MEDLINE, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and BDEnf, were searched using keywords like “Mental disorder,” “Psychiatric health,” “Nursing care,” and “Hospital.” Methodological quality was assessed using JBI and SQUIRE tools. The integration of quantitative and qualitative components occurred through meta-aggregation of qualitative data and frequency-based coding of quantitative themes, allowing thematic convergence across study designs.
Six studies were included. Meta-aggregation revealed frequent terms, such as “Nurse,” “Emergency,” “Screening,” “Patient,” and “Care.” Similarity analysis linked “Nurse” with “perception” and “experience” and “Emergency” with “Screening” and “Mental health,” highlighting the importance of experience and training. Five categories emerged: (1) professional experience (19.05%, showing skill gaps despite experience); (2) caring process (19.05%, stressing efficient screening); (3) barriers and challenges (19.05%, revealing difficulty with comorbidities); (4) training process (19.05%, identifying training deficiencies); and (5) therapeutic interventions (23.81%, discussing restraint use). These percentages refer to the proportional frequency of themes identified across the total number of studies analyzed. For thematic classification, only statistically significant chi-square values (p < 0.05) were considered in the grouping of content.
Nursing care for psychiatric patients in hospitals faces challenges like insufficient training and difficulty managing psychiatric comorbidities. Recommendations include incorporating structured mental health content into nursing curricula and hospital-based continuing education programs. These strategies may guide future healthcare policies in Brazil by improving patient safety, reducing hospital readmissions, and promoting more humane, evidence-based therapeutic interventions.
The findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted education and training to improve nursing care for psychiatric patients in hospital settings.
Objetivo: identificar las necesidades humanas básicas de las embarazadas de alto riesgo hospitalizadas con base en la Teoría de Wanda Horta. Método: investigación asistencial realizada con dieciséis gestantes de alto riesgo hospitalizadas en una maternidad de referencia en Ceará entre septiembre y noviembre de 2019. Se recolectó información a través de diario de campo y ficha de caracterización de las gestantes y registros de necesidades humanas básicas. Los resultados se analizaron mediante estadística descriptiva simple y un enfoque integral a la luz del marco de Wanda Horta. Resultados: las gestantes presentaron necesidades psicobiológicas, psicosociales y psicoespirituales, siendo prevalentes: ausencia de actividades de ocio, inseguridad emocional, escaso conocimiento, sueño y descanso perjudicados, y actividades físicas restringidas por indicación de descanso. Consideraciones finales: se cree que el razonamiento crítico y el juicio clínico de los enfermeros se centraron en la individualidad de las gestantes, identificando necesidades en los tres niveles propuestos por la teoría, apuntando caminos para cualificar el cuidado de enfermería a las gestantes de alto riesgo.
Objetivo: identificar los diagnósticos de enfermería y las intervenciones más frecuentes en la asistencia a los pacientes en hemodiálisis. Método: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, transversal, retrospectivo con un enfoque cuantitativo, realizado con 175 prontuarios de pacientes en hemodiálisis, asistidos en el servicio por un período de seis meses. Para la recolección de los datos, se utilizó la plataforma Google Forms®, generando una hoja de trabajo en Microsoft Excel®, un software que permite organizar, describir y analizar los mismos. Resultados principales: se identificaron tres diagnósticos de enfermería como más frecuentes: Riesgo de sangrado (67,2%); Riesgo de caída (56,5%) y Exceso de volumen de líquido (54,8%), en más de la mitad de los pacientes de acuerdo con los registros en los prontuarios. Las intervenciones de enfermería están dirigidas por el protocolo del procedimiento de hemodiálisis y no por los diagnósticos de enfermería. Conclusión: los diagnósticos más frecuentes se centran en las condiciones clínicas de la población estudiada, y no subvencionan las intervenciones de enfermería, que se definen con base en técnica de hemodiálisis.
FreshRSS 