HIV and tuberculosis (TB) are two of the most devastating disease conditions of public health concern globally. A co-infection of the two diseases poses serious health challenges to patients including mental health problems, ranging from mild to severe, with differing outcomes. This systematic review aims to assess the correlates of HIV-TB co-infection and mental health of adults living in sub-Saharan Africa.

We will conduct comprehensive database and non-database searches for studies (published and unpublished). We will search Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, HINARI and African Journals Online from inception to 31 May 2025, without restriction on language. We will also search the grey literature, including conference proceedings, preprint repositories, databases of dissertations, WHO and governmental databases. In the event where there is a need to contact experts and corresponding authors for further information, the review team will do so to enrich the content of the review. At least three reviewers will independently undertake study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using validated tools. We will resolve discrepancies or disagreements through discussion. We will analyse dichotomous data as risk ratio, OR or proportion and continuous data as mean difference with their SD; all estimates will be presented with their 95% CI. Where applicable, we will determine SD from point estimates and the appropriate denominators assuming a binomial distribution. The magnitude of heterogeneity between the included studies will be assessed quantitatively using the index of heterogeneity (I² statistic). The I² values of 25%, 50% and 75% will be considered to represent low, moderate and significant heterogeneity. The significance of heterogeneity will be determined by the p value of the I² statistic, and a p value of

This systematic review will collate secondary research based on publicly available published and unpublished studies, and no ethical approval is required. However, an eligible study with serious ethical issues will be excluded and the reasons for exclusion documented. The review findings will be shared with key stakeholders, health authorities, agencies involved in the mental health of persons living with HIV-TB (PLHTB) co-infection, social services providers and policy implementers. The findings will be presented at scientific conferences and symposia. The final review report will be in the form of a scientific paper in a high-impact factor peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42024572331.

Poor menstrual health and unmet menstrual needs influence several aspects of adolescent girls’ lives, including their educational outcomes. However, evidence on menstrual health needs and educational outcomes among these vulnerable girls living in countries across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is fragmented and inconclusive. The systematic review aims to explore the association between menstrual health needs and educational outcomes among adolescent girls (10–19 years) living in SSA.

Studies (published and unpublished) will be identified from relevant electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and LILACS without language restriction from January 2012 to December 2024. A comprehensive set of search terms and their alternate terms, together with the names of countries in sub-Saharan Africa, will be used for running the searches. We will also search Scopus, Web of Science, African Index Medicus, HINARI, African Journals Online, Academic Search Premier, MedRXIV, ProQuest, EBSCO Open Dissertations and reference lists of relevant studies. We will contact experts, identified through authorship of key publications in menstrual health research and recommendations from established research networks, for potentially relevant unpublished studies. All retrieved articles from the electronic databases and grey literature will be collated and deduplicated using Endnote and exported to Rayyan QCRI. The pre-defined eligibility criteria will be followed to screen papers for inclusion in the review. The flow of studies will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. Given the anticipated volume of literature to be reviewed, at least two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess the quality of the included studies for risk of bias using the Robbins-E risk of bias assessment tool. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion between the reviewers. The Joanna Briggs Institute’s Sumari Software will be used for citation management. Binary outcomes will be estimated using pooled proportions (for non-comparative studies) and odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) (for comparative studies), reported with their 95% CIs. The mean difference (MD) will be used for reporting continuous outcomes with their 95% CIs. In the case where different instruments have been used to report means, we will employ standardised mean difference (SMD). Heterogeneity will be assessed graphically for overlapping CIs and statistically using the I² statistic, and if heterogeneity is detected to be high (>50%), subgroup analysis will be performed to assess the impact of such variation.

While ethical approval is not required for the systematic review methodology itself, appropriate data sharing agreements and confidentiality protocols will be followed when collecting unpublished data from experts. The findings from this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. Also, the findings will be communicated to local stakeholders (eg, adolescent girls, parents/guardians, school authorities) in appropriate formats and languages to support translation into policy and practice to improve menstrual health and hygiene and education for adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa.

CRD42024565296.