Conectar
To explore the prescribing practices and behaviours of Advanced Practice Nurses (APN) and pharmacist prescribers in Singapore, assess their confidence in key prescribing competencies, examine their use of information sources, and understand their views on the consequences of prescribing errors.
Cross-sectional national survey.
A census survey of all registered APN and pharmacist prescribers in Singapore was conducted from February to May 2024 using a validated 96-item instrument. The survey assessed prescribing practices, confidence in prescribing competencies, use of information sources, and prescribing safety. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
Ninety-one prescribers (54 APNs, 37 pharmacists) responded (32% response rate), most of whom worked in public medical/surgical settings. Prescribing comprised a median of 75% of their practice. Most time was spent prescribing continued medications, with less on initiating new medicines. Participants reported high confidence in communication, therapeutic partnerships, and working within professional standards. Greatest confidence was seen in educating patients, legal prescribing, and monitoring treatment response. Lower confidence was noted in complementary medicine-related tasks. Professional literature and colleagues were the most valued information sources. Most participants acknowledged the serious consequences of prescribing errors, though many believed such errors would likely be intercepted.
APNs and pharmacists demonstrate strong competencies in safe, holistic prescribing. However, cultural factors may limit patient engagement, highlighting the need to strengthen shared decision-making and collaborative practice.
Refining governance structures, adopting tiered prescriber autonomy, and enhancing training in complex prescribing are essential. Standardising deprescribing, improving access to decision-support tools, and promoting interprofessional collaboration and patient involvement can strengthen care quality and team-based delivery.
This study offers the first national insight into Singapore's Collaborative Prescribing Framework and informs training, policy, and workforce development for non-physician prescribers locally and in similar international contexts.
STROBE checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Chronic low back pain (LBP) is among the world’s leading causes of disability and declines in quality of life. Despite considerable financial and research investment, current interventions demonstrate only modest success or are associated with deleterious side effects. Furthermore, most treatment efforts are directed towards LBP that has already become chronic, rather than interventions capable of preventing pain chronicity in the first instance. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a portable and cost-effective form of non-invasive brain stimulation, presents a potential means of targeting acute pain and preventing the transition to chronic pain. However, this approach has been limited primarily to experimental settings that require intensive appointments and specialist expertise. Thus, this assessor-blinded, participant-blinded, and therapist-blinded, randomised controlled trial aims to explore the effectiveness of home-based tDCS for improving pain and disability in people with acute LBP. This may provide insight into the potential for tDCS to expedite recovery from acute LBP and prevent pain chronicity.
40 individuals with acute LBP (onset
Ethics approval has been granted by the Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee (H16334). Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journal publication.
To survey registered nurses' familiarity with delegation standards and confidence to delegate to unlicenced workers within their practice.
Cross-sectional exploratory survey design.
The survey focused on Australian registered nurses (n = 420). Initial descriptive analysis was undertaken. Additionally, inferential analysis was undertaken between two independent variables focused on familiarity of delegation policy, and confidence to delegate, and several demographic and workplace variables. Stepwise linear regression was undertaken to determine predictors of the two delegation variables. The cross-sectional study was undertaken according to the STROBE reporting checklist.
The majority of respondents were somewhat familiar, or not familiar at all with delegation standards. This pattern was followed for results relevant to confidence delegating to unlicenced workers. Nurses working in adult acute, intensive care and emergency department reported the lowest levels of familiarity with delegation. Additionally, intensive care nurses were significantly less likely to feel very confident delegating to unlicenced support workers. Stepwise regression revealed identifying as male, and working in the public sector were less likely to be confident delegating. Nurses working in the acute setting and public sector were less familiar with delegation standards.
The findings of this study highlight the nuanced nature of delegation to unlicenced workers in Australian nursing settings, with nurses from certain contexts being far less likely to be familiar with or confident undertaking the practice.
The findings of this study have significant implications to increase understanding of nurses diverse contexts of practice and how delegation standards might not be implemented in practice in a confident manner.
FreshRSS 