Sleep problems are an escalating global health concern, with prevalence estimates ranging from 8.3% to 45%. Physicians are disproportionately affected, with rates around 44% compared with 36% in the general population. In Bangladesh, reported rates range from 32% to 58%, with physicians being particularly vulnerable. Poor sleep among physicians is strongly linked to burnout, medical errors and increased mental health risks. Despite these serious implications, existing evidence from Bangladesh remains fragmented and inconsistent, limiting its utility for health policy and workforce interventions. This review therefore seeks to generate reliable pooled prevalence estimates and identify key determinants of sleep problems among Bangladeshi physicians.

The research team will search the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, PsycInfo, ProQuest Medical, CINAHL, Google Scholar and BanglaJOL electronic and regional databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines for published studies from inception until 1 August 2025, using truncated and phrase-searched keywords, relevant medical subject headings and citation chaining from grey literature. Observational cross-sectional studies published within the predefined timeframe, using validated assessment tools, and published in English or other major international languages will be prioritised for inclusion. Review papers, case reports, case series, intervention studies, commentaries, preprints, meeting abstracts, protocols, unpublished articles and letters will be excluded. Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved papers using the Rayyan web-based application, with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Quantitative estimates of sleep problems, including prevalence, duration, quality and associated risk factors among Bangladeshi physicians will be extracted. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis will be performed to assess the pooled prevalence using a random effects meta-analysis model. Forest and funnel plots will be generated for visualisation. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I² statistic, with sensitivity or subgroup analysis conducted as required. The quality of included studies will be evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools for observational study designs. All statistical analysis will be conducted using Jamovi V2.7.6, R V4.3.2 ‘meta’ packages and GraphPad Prism V9.0.2.

This review will synthesise evidence from existing published literature. While completing the findings, the findings will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conferences, policy forums and stakeholders’ networks to inform future research and interventions.

CRD420251123294.

As of 2024, 123.2 million people had been forcibly displaced as a result of persecution, armed conflict or climate-related catastrophes, and these numbers are predicted to rise. There is a growing awareness of possible intergenerational effects of trauma on life-course health and well-being, however few studies have followed individuals longitudinally starting prenatally. This paper describes the first large prenatal birth cohort study in a refugee context in a lower middle-income country. This study aims to investigate the potential lifespan health and developmental implications of being born into a protracted humanitarian context, and what factors can buffer from the adversity posed by conflict and displacement.

We outline our approach of recruiting, consenting and gathering data from pregnant Rohingya refugee and host community women (N=2888; 80% Rohingya) over the course of 12 months in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh.

A fifth wave of data collection, when children were 6 months old, was completed in April 2025. Rohingya women were substantially less literate; were marrying and having children at slightly younger ages, were more likely to live in crowded, resource-limited households and exhibited higher rates of clinically significant post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety than host community women.

There is a critical need for research in displaced populations in order to elucidate potentially lasting transgenerational impacts of experiencing conflict and displacement trauma, and the prenatal and postnatal factors that support health and development across the life span. The next follow-up is planned when the children turn 36 months of age (starting March 2026).

Despite increasing proportions of underrepresented minority (URM) medical school graduates, their progression into surgical training and leadership remains disproportionately low. Barriers such as financial constraints, limited mentorship and implicit bias contribute to this disparity, creating a disconnect between the diversity of patient populations and those providing care. While interventions such as mentorship programmes and pipeline initiatives have been implemented, their overall effectiveness has not been systematically evaluated. The primary aim of this scoping review is to map the current landscape of interventions, programmes and policies designed to enhance access to surgical careers for URM learners.

Searches will be conducted on EMBASE, Web of Science and OVID MEDLINE. Three independent reviewers will screen references, extract data and perform analyses with disagreements adjudicated by a fourth reviewer. This review will include studies conducted across all levels of training: secondary (high school or secondary school), postsecondary (undergraduate, medical school) and postgraduate (residency, fellowship), with no geographical restrictions. The definition of URM will be accepted as reported within each individual study, allowing for variability in racial, ethnic, gender, socioeconomic or other criteria. The review will include any structured interventions, programmes or policies aimed at increasing URM representation in surgical education. Data on the nature, duration and target population of each intervention will be extracted. The primary outcome will be the reported impact of interventions on URM representation or participation in surgical education. Secondary outcomes will include characteristics of the study participants, definitions of URM status and any qualitative or quantitative evaluations of intervention effectiveness.

Research ethics approval is not required under University of Toronto policy. Study results will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Results will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders at conference presentation(s) and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

COVID-19 led to significant economic and psychosocial impacts on individuals and their local communities. This research aimed to investigate the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on a diverse range of individuals living in coastal areas in East Sussex, UK, including adverse, unexpected and positive outcomes.

This cross-sectional qualitative study used semistructured interviews conducted remotely between December 2020 and March 2021, referred to as the third lockdown. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to identify, describe, and analyse themes and patterns within the data.

Purposive sampling was used to recruit 25 participants living in East Sussex, to include a range of ages (above 18 years), genders, race/ethnicities, identities (eg, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans or intersex) and social backgrounds.

The pandemic was described as a significant life-changing event, with people saying their plans had changed ‘overnight’ and that their life was ‘on hold’ or it had lost its ‘infrastructure’ during the pandemic. Immediate changes to social lives, education, future plans, work, and housing were evident. These changes were felt particularly by those shielding (due to underlying health conditions) and people placed in emergency accommodation. Significant areas of impact were around family, friends, leisure, mental health, health-related behaviours, and employment. Some participants reflected on positive impacts around an increased sense of well-being or the restrictions affording time and flexibility to re-engage with their families. Adverse impacts around reduced friendship groups and the disruption to family life were often mitigated by developing strategies that helped adapt to new situations.

Residents of coastal areas in East Sussex were impacted widely and differentially. Both positive and challenging impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic were experienced unequally, potentially exacerbating health inequalities in coastal communities who were already at risk. Long-term strategies should consider the vulnerabilities of people living in coastal areas in planning for future health crises.

This study used data from the nationally representative Bangladesh household income and expenditure survey (HIES) 2022.

Eight divisions of Bangladesh.

14 395 households.

We examined how household consumption patterns across 20 expenditure categories were impacted by OOP health spending for NCD management, with a focus on income-level disparities.

In Bangladesh, OOP health expenditures for NCDs crowded out household expenditures on essential items like food and rent. Across all households, OOP health expenditures for NCDs by 10 US$ crowded out –3.8 US$ of expenditure on food (95% CI –5.1 to –2.5), and more specifically on protein-rich foods (–2.0 US$, 95% CI –2.8 to –1.2), spices (–0.2 US$, 95% CI –0.3 to –0.1), and restaurant and café meals (–0.9 US$, 95% CI –1.4 to –0.5). Crowding-out was also seen for tobacco, rent, durable goods and miscellaneous. In lower-income households, expenditures on food (–4.1 US$, 95% CI –7.2 to –1.1), restaurant and café meals (–2.0 US$, 95% CI –3.1 to –0.8), spices (–0.4 US$, 95% CI –0.7 to –0.09), and rent (–3.1 US$, 95% CI –4.5 to –1.6) were significantly crowded out.

This research demonstrates that NCD-related spending in Bangladesh reduces budgets for both food and non-food expenditures, with a stronger crowding-out effect on food items and rent, particularly in lower-income households. Effective financial and social protection mechanisms against NCDs are warranted to safeguard the consumption of the NCD-affected households in Bangladesh.

To develop and validate a risk prediction model for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) to enable early identification of at-risk women and support clinical decision-making in North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia.

A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study.

Six public hospitals in the North Wollo Zone, Northern Ethiopia.

A total of 1098 pregnant women were included in the study using systematic random sampling.

Occurrence of PPROM.

Data were collected between 20 November 2023 and 20 March 2024, using structured interviews and medical record reviews. A risk prediction model was developed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and logistic regression. Model performance was assessed through area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation was conducted via bootstrap resampling. A simplified risk score was created to categorise women into high-risk and low-risk groups, and its clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis.

Among the 1098 participants (100% response rate), the mean age was 21.54 years (IQR: 18–26), with 57.2% aged 20–34 years. The prevalence of PPROM was 10.75% (95% CI 9.01% to 12.77%). Seven significant predictors were identified: maternal age

PPROM remains a significant obstetric complication in the study area. The validated risk prediction model showed moderate to good performance and can be used to support early screening and risk-based management in antenatal care (ANC). Integrating the tool into routine ANC services, along with health education and management of modifiable risk factors, may help reduce PPROM-related adverse outcomes. Further external validation is recommended.

Longitudinal studies provide insights into the outcomes of medical training curriculum. However, few educational cohort studies have been conducted in Iran. This study aims first to evaluate the impact of the current curriculum on medical students' medium- and long-term academic and career outcomes and, second, to identify medical students' characteristics and how they change through the doctor of medicine programme.

This protocol outlines a multi-phase, prospective cohort study that will take place in Mashhad, Iran. The study will implement the Kirkpatrick model, investigating medical students' knowledge, skills, behaviour and professionalism development over 10 years. Approximately 1000 medical students will be recruited through peer invitations and social networks. Data will be collected through baseline and follow-up questionnaires, academic performance records and comprehensive test scores throughout the Doctor of Medicine (MD) programme.

The data from the questionnaires will be reported using a Likert scale. Quantitative data will be described using means and SD, while qualitative variables will be presented as frequencies and percentages. We will evaluate the relationship between quantitative variables using correlation coefficients and the relationship between qualitative variables via the ² or Fisher exact test. All tests will be two-sided, with a significance level set as p

All participants will complete written informed consent before data collection. All students can withdraw from the study at any time with no consequences. Results of this study will be presented at relevant conferences and will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

IR.MUMS.REC.1400.311.

Digital health interventions (DHIs) are changing the healthcare landscape. However, using these tools effectively for people with chronic conditions in rural areas comes with challenges, highlighting the need to understand their lived experiences. No systematic review was found that examines the inclusion of lived experience in DHI for individuals with chronic conditions in rural areas and how this impacts their acceptance of technology. A systematic review grounded by Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) will be conducted to examine the lived experiences of individuals in rural areas who use DHIs. Individuals with chronic conditions will be examined specifically and how their experiences influence the adoption, use and satisfaction with DHI for managing their health needs. This systematic literature review is significant because it will be used as a crucial starting point for a larger project aimed at creating digitally transformed primary healthcare in rural areas, particularly for Indigenous communities. The insights gained will inform the development of a digital transformation model for the larger project.

Guided by the TAM and PRISMA to explore the lived experiences of patients and caregivers with digital health, a search will be conducted for peer-reviewed studies on DHIs, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method approaches, including systematic reviews. The studies must be published in English from 2019 to the present and will be sourced from databases such as PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science. MeSH will be utilised to identify terms like user experience, acceptability and engagement with DHIs. Eligibility will be based on relevance, population, intervention and outcomes. A standardised data extraction form will be developed and tested to capture important information from each study included in the review. Data extraction and quality appraisal will be performed independently by two reviewers, with a third reviewer addressing any discrepancies. Software will be used to manage extracted data, assess risk of bias and synthesise the data. Meta-analysis will be included to enhance our findings if sufficient quantitative data is available. Our findings will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. This review protocol was refined in June 2025; commencement of the study will be in July 2025 and will be completed in 2026.

This study used previously published literature and did not collect primary data from humans or animals. No ethical committee approval was required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and will be presented at conferences related to the field.

osf.io/jw5yp.

In Bangladesh, evidence on the long-term trajectory of adolescents' sexual and reproductive health (SRH) remains limited, largely due to the lack of longitudinal data to assess the changes over time. To address this gap, the Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (AdSEARCH) project of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) set up an adolescent cohort study aimed at documenting changes in SRH knowledge, attitudes and practices, and identifying the factors affecting these changes. This article presents the baseline sociodemographic and SRH characteristics of this cohort as a pathway for future analyses.

This cohort study included 2713 adolescents from the Baliakandi Health and Demographic Surveillance System run by icddr,b. The cohort covered three age groups from girls and boys, giving a total of five cohorts: girls aged 12, 14 and 16 years; and boys aged 14 and 16 years. A total of seven rounds of data had been collected at 4-month intervals over 2-years follow-up period.

The majority of adolescents were attending school (90%), and school dropouts were higher among boys. Around 17% of the respondents were involved in income-generating activities, which were mostly boys. Among girls, the mean age of menarche was 12.2 years. Overall, 6% of adolescents had major depressive disorder, with prevalence increasing with age. Gender differences were evident regarding knowledge about conception and contraception. Egalitarian attitudes towards social norms and gender roles were found higher among girls (52%) compared to boys (11%). The majority of adolescents reported experiencing social/verbal bullying (43%), followed by physical violence (38%) and cyberbullying (4%).

This article presents the baseline findings only. A series of papers is in the pipeline for submission to different peer-reviewed journals. The findings from this study will be used to support data-driven policy formulation for future adolescent health programmes.