Conectar
To quantify and describe the use of real-world data (RWD) in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) oncology technology appraisal (TA) final appraisal determination documents.
A systematic literature review was conducted on pharmaceutical NICE oncology TAs published between April 2000 and March 2024 (covering financial years 2000/2001 to 2023/2024 inclusive) extracted on 22 August 2023 (2000/2001 - 2022/2023) and 8 August 2024 (2023/2024).
NICE TA final appraisal determination documents.
All pharmaceutical oncology TAs published between April 2000 and March 2024 (financial years 2000/2001 to 2023/2024) that did not go on to be terminated.
The data required for eligibility screening was extracted from an Excel file directly from the NICE website, where data related to each TA was extracted using an automated script derived from published sources. TAs were assessed based on prespecified review criteria covering whether an RWD submission was reported by the committee, and if so, which RWD sources were used, alongside the methods reported and any feedback from the committee regarding the use of RWD. Bias was not assessed as part of the study.
Of 310 TAs identified, 135 (48.0%) used RWD. A variety of RWD types were used, mostly from UK or US data sources. 47 TAs (34.8%) leveraged RWD from multiple sources. RWD was mostly used in comparisons of survival (41.5%), to inform utility values (26.7%) and to compare baseline characteristics (19.3%), with matched adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) and external control arms (ECAs), seen from 2015 and 2018, respectively. The committee expressed concerns around the RWD presented by the company in 53 TAs (39.2%), the most common being a lack of generalisability to the UK population and/or National Health Service practice and comprehensiveness of the RWD.
This study quantifies the increasing use of diverse RWD sources in NICE oncology TAs, as well as the shift towards more complex methods like MAICs and ECAs. The feedback of the NICE committee highlights key areas of improvement as the generalisability and maturity of the RWD presented.
Early and balanced replacement of blood products appears to be the key factor in improving outcomes of major bleeding patients including acute trauma, cardiac, obstetric and transplant surgery patients. Definitive clinical guidance regarding the optimal ratio of blood products, including those containing fibrinogen, is still lacking. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that increasing the fibrinogen content to erythrocyte suspension ratio improves the mortality and functional outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries with expected major bleeding.
The Approximate Dose-Equivalent of Fibrinogen-to-Erythrocyte Suspension (ADEFES) ratio is a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study of patients undergoing major surgical procedures with expected major perioperative bleeding (ie, requiring packed red blood cells (PRBC)>4U/24 hours). For 5U of cryoprecipitate and 1.5 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), the approximate dose-equivalent for fibrinogen is considered as 1 gram of fibrinogen. Association of the ADEFES ratio at 24 hours will be assessed on the primary objective, which will consist of the composite of 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day bleeding-specific mortality and the ‘highly-dependent scores’ of Katz index of independence in activities of daily living.
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (approval no. E2-23-4265, dated 07 June 2023; Chair: Prof. Dr. F.E. Canpolat) and by the institutional review boards of all participating centres. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, as well as in compliance with national regulations on data protection and Good Clinical Practice standards. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.
The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals, presentations at national and international conferences, and communication with relevant stakeholders including clinical practitioners and healthcare institutions. If applicable, study outcomes will also be shared via institutional newsletters and digital platforms to reach a broader audience in the medical community.
Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, with a high 5-year survival rate of approximately 98%. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, up to 20% of patients experience recurrence, adversely affecting their quality of life. Predictive models have been developed to assess recurrence risk and guide clinical decision-making, but these models often face limitations such as retrospective design, lack of diversity in study populations and absence of external validation. The primary aim is to externally validate existing predictive models for DTC recurrence using prospective data from a diverse Latin American cohort. The secondary aim is to explore opportunities for model recalibration to improve their performance in our population.
The CaTaLiNA study is a multicentre prospective observational study conducted across 10 hospitals in five Latin American countries, including Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay and Mexico. Patients aged 18 years or older receiving treatment for DTC, such as the first thyroid surgery, active surveillance or radiofrequency ablation will be included. Recruitment will occur from November 2023 to June 2025, with follow-up extending until June 2028. Data collection will include baseline clinical, surgical and histological characteristics, treatment details and follow-up outcomes. Statistical analysis will follow the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis guidelines, using imputation strategies for missing data and evaluating calibration and discrimination of the prediction models. Calibration measures include the ratio of expected and observed events, calibration slope and calibration plot, while discrimination will be assessed using the C-index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
This study protocol was approved by Comité de Ética de Investigación en Seres Humanos de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ ‘CEISH-USFQ’ APO-010–2023-CEIHS-USFQ Oficio No. 161-2023-CA-23030M-CEISH-USFQ. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Survivors often experience physical and psychological effects arising from breast cancer and its treatment, which can last months and years, adversely impacting quality of life. As the number of early breast cancer survivors increases, models of specialist-led follow-up care in hospital settings are not sustainable and evidence suggests that they may not meet survivors’ needs. Nurse-enabled, shared-care, follow-up models between cancer specialist and primary care teams have potential to address this need.
The proposed research is a multicentre, prospective, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial designed to test the effectiveness and implementation of IBIS-Survivorship, a follow-up care model for patients with early breast cancer who have completed primary treatment. The IBIS-Survivorship intervention involves a nurse-led consultation, development of a Survivorship Care Plan and case-conferencing between a breast care nurse and the patient’s primary care provider. This study seeks to recruit 1079 breast cancer survivors across six cancer centres (clusters) in Australia. Health-related quality of life at 12 months assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer questionnaire will be the primary endpoint, along with a range of patient-reported outcomes, safety indicators and cost-effectiveness measures as secondary endpoints. General and generalised linear mixed models will be used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care. Implementation and process outcomes will be assessed using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework.
Ethical approval was provided by the Metro South Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2020/QMS/59892) and reciprocally across the other five trial sites under National Mutual Acceptance arrangements. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed academic journal publications and presentations at national and international conferences.
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Trial ID: ACTRN12621000188831.
Our study was designed to assess whether paired normal-tumour testing increased access to targeted therapy, clinical trials and influenced cancer screening recommendations given to patients and their families.
Prospective cohort study.
Academic cancer centre in the Pacific Northwest region of the USA.
Patients newly diagnosed between 01 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 with cancers of the oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction and stomach (CEGEJS) were included. All other cancer diagnoses such as head and neck, duodenal and lower gastrointestinal tract cancers were excluded.
Paired germline and tumour genetic test within 90 days of new patient visit.
Number of targeted therapies received (or not) when eligible, follow-up treatment data and number of inherited predispositions to cancers identified. No secondary outcome measures.
Of 42 patients, 32 (76.2%) were eligible for at least one targeted therapy. 19 patients received immunotherapy, when 16 had a biomarker predicting immunotherapy benefit, and benefit of immunotherapy was unclear for 3. Another 11 did not have this biomarker, and 6 of them received immunotherapy. Six pathogenic variants were identified in four high-risk genes. By 01 January 2024, 18 patients (42.9%) had died of complications of cancer.
More than 75% of patients who received tumour testing were eligible for a targeted therapy regardless of their stage at diagnosis, emphasising the need to expand access to testing with staging workup to improve survival outcomes. Six families received personalised screening recommendations, thanks to this study.
by Laura S. Mkumba, Fortunata Nasuwa, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Aisa M. Shayo, Coleen K. Cunningham, Karen E. O’Donnell, Dorothy E. Dow
Youth living with HIV (YLWH) face psychosocial challenges and HIV-related stigma, which impact adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). This study was designed to understand better the change in mental health symptoms and experiences with stigma among YLWH in Tanzania who completed the original pilot Sauti ya Vijana (SYV), a mental health and life skills group intervention. YLWH who completed SYV and demonstrated a change of ≥2 points in either direction on their Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9 (depression screener) from baseline to 18 months were purposively sampled. HIV Stigma was measured using 10-questions from the Berger HIV Stigma Scale, and findings ranged from 4–16 for internal stigma and 6–24 for external stigma. In-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted in Kiswahili and included topics such as history of mental health challenges, perceptions of stigma, and experiences with the SYV intervention. Interviews were transcribed, translated to English, and analyzed for emergent themes. Ten youth, 18–25 years of age, were interviewed; 70% were male. Mean (SD) PHQ-9 scores were 7.3 (SD = 3.5) at baseline and 5.6 (SD = 5.0) at 18 months. All participants reported experiencing intermittent episodes of mental health challenges due to difficult interpersonal relationships and fear of stigma. Youth relied on peer support and skills from the SYV intervention to cope with mental health challenges and stigma. Participants reported fear of being stigmatized by others, which led to behaviors such as skipping medication or avoiding situations for worry about unintentional disclosure. All participants endorsed experiencing external stigma on the HIV stigma scale; however, only 3 of 10 participants reported experiencing enacted stigma when directly asked to describe an experience during in-depth interviews. Participants described how SYV helped them have “more confidence”, accept themselves, and incorporate positive coping skills such as relaxation (deep breathing) when they felt stressed. The findings suggest SYV helped YLWH accept themselves, develop positive coping methods, and identify and form peer social support; but stigma remains common. Descriptions of stigma were not recognized as such; experiences of enacted stigma were acknowledged by some participants. More research is needed to understand and measure mental distress and wellness as well as stigma in this population so that interventions may more accurately detect change in key outcomes.
FreshRSS 