FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Use of Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Wound Care Management to Enhance Access to Care Rural and Northern Communities

ABSTRACT

Wound care remains a high-priority area for improvement in the Canadian health care system. Older adults aged 65 and older are disproportionately affected by chronic and non-healing wounds and often experience multiple co-morbid conditions, challenges which can be further complicated by living in rural and northern areas. A workshop-based multi-methods study was conducted to describe rural and northern perspectives on opportunities and feasibility to implement innovative wound care technologies. Each workshop included pre- and post- workshop surveys, a live demonstration of Swift Skin and Wound, a Q&A session, and facilitated discussion exploring the technology's feasibility, usability, and accessibility in northern and rural care contexts. Participants who volunteered for the study included care staff and healthcare executives (N = 11), described their perspectives on implementing AI-driven digital wound care management solutions with a focus on integration into health care settings. Three themes were identified including: confidence and optimism in improving wound care management, recognition of the superiority of AI-driven digital wound care solutions over current practices, and the importance of adaptable change processes for successful adoption. While generalizability may be limited, findings suggest that adopting AI-driven wound care tools could improve wound assessment accuracy and streamline care for aging populations in rural and northern areas.

Core outcome set and measures of chest health in children and young people with cerebral palsy in the community setting: the CHESTI study protocol

Por: Knight Lozano · R. · Morris · C. · Shannon · H. · Bell · K. · Malyon · H. · Melluish · J. · Latour · J. · CHESTI-study steering group · Andrews · Crombie · Gibson · Grace · Goddard · Kolawole · Lowndes · McNamara · Pilbury · Rapson · Scivier · Sellers · Weighton · Winston
Introduction

Poor chest health is the leading cause of early mortality in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It is also the most common reason to seek healthcare, accruing significant costs and reducing quality-of-life for children and families. Clinical trials examining chest health interventions in CP are characterised by inconsistent outcome measures, limiting the capacity for evidence synthesis to inform clinical application. The study aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) and related measurement instruments to assess, monitor and evaluate chest health in children with CP, both in research and routine clinical practice. The COS will reflect the views of children, young people, parent/carers, clinicians and researchers, emphasising under-represented groups in research and those at risk of poorer chest health.

Methods and analysis

A 3-phase methodology will be conducted in line with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. (1) Candidate outcomes will be identified through a qualitative evidence synthesis and interviews with key stakeholders. Findings will be mapped to COMET-taxonomy, generating a list of candidate outcomes. (2) An international e-Delphi survey will invite stakeholders to rate the importance of each outcome, followed by a consensus meeting to ratify the COS. (3) A structured review, guided by health measurement taxonomy, will evaluate relevant instruments, with a final meeting to agree on recommended measures for each COS domain.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval was provided by the University of Plymouth Research Ethics Committee for the qualitative interview study (ID5116), e-Delphi study and consensus meeting (ID5636). Study findings will be published open access in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.

Study registration

COMET registration: 2590 (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2590)

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42024562735.

Co‐Designing a Model of Brilliant Care for Older People

ABSTRACT

Aim

This study aimed to co-design a model of brilliant care for older people that provides clear, actionable principles to guide how brilliant care for older people can be realised.

Background

As the demand for and international importance of care for older people grows, so too does the negative discourse about care for older people. This ongoing focus on deficiencies can have implications for patients, carers, clinicians, health services, and policymakers, overshadowing opportunities for innovation and positive change.

Design

Experience-based co-design informed this study, grounded in the lived experiences of key stakeholders.

Methods

Three scaffolded co-design workshops were facilitated, involving lived experience experts, managers, professionals, clinicians, and an academic (n= 13). The data collected during these workshops were analysed using a qualitative descriptive method and documented according to COREQ guidelines to optimise rigour and transparency.

Results

The participants co-designed a model of brilliant care for older people, comprising principles to promote connection and innovation. To promote connection, the model includes protecting staff member time to deliver meaningful care and demonstrating that everyone matters. To promote innovation, it encourages role flexibility, curiosity, small improvements, and the recognition of brilliant practices.

Conclusions

This article presents a co-designed model of brilliant care for older people, incorporating principles of connection and innovation that can be enacted through simple, resource-efficient practices.

Relevance to Clinical Practice

For those who manage and deliver care for older people, the model encompasses simple, accessible, and cost-effective principles to: positively deviate from norms within the sector, offering care to older people; and to deliver brilliant care for older people. Furthermore, given that the model was co-designed with lived experience experts, managers, professionals, and clinicians, its principles are imbued with their experiential insights, which served to bring particular priorities to the fore.

Patient or Public Contribution

The co-designers, who included lived experience experts, were invited to participate in workshops to co-design a model of brilliant care for older people, during which they discussed and critiqued the findings constructed from the data and co-designed the model.

Characterisation of a clinical trial-like population of high cardiovascular risk patients prior to myocardial infarction or stroke in the real world: design and protocol for a multidatabase retrospective cohort study

Por: Ochs · A. · Chan · Q. · Dhalwani · N. N. · Duxbury · M. · Shannon · E. · OKelly · J. · Paiva da Silva Lima · G. · Avcil · S. · Chan · A. Y. · Chui · C. S. · Lai · E. C.-C. · Cars · T. · Shin · J.-Y. · Heintjes · E. M. · Wong · I. C.
Introduction

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an important modifiable risk factor of major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke but with established risk factors and elevated LDL-C may benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT); however, the size and potential healthcare burden of this population globally are not known. The benefits of evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in these patients, are currently being studied in the phase 3 Effect of Evolocumab in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk Without Prior Myocardial Infarction or Stroke (VESALIUS-CV) trial. To characterise the high-risk pre–CV-event (VESALIUS-CV–like) individuals in the real world, an observational study is being conducted across multiple countries.

Methods and analysis

This retrospective cohort study will use a common protocol and an analytical common data model approach to characterise VESALIUS-CV–like individuals in the real world across different geographical regions and healthcare settings. The study period will be from 2010 to 2022, subject to data availability in study sites. Patients aged 50 years and older at high risk of CV disease but without prior MI or stroke will be included in this study. VESALIUS-CV–like individuals are defined through a combination of the following: (1) one diagnosis of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease or diabetes with microvascular complications or chronic insulin use; (2) an elevated LDL-C measurement and (3) other high-risk factors. The objectives of this study are to estimate the prevalence of VESALIUS-CV–like individuals, describe their characteristics and care pathways and estimate their incidence rates of CV events and healthcare costs. The prevalence of VESALIUS-CV–like individuals will be expressed as annual prevalence; patient characteristics at index date will be presented using summary statistics; care pathways will be summarised as LLT prescription across time; and the incidence of defined CV events will be expressed as events per person-years as well as at certain time periods. Healthcare costs will be presented as CV-related costs in different time periods.

Ethics and dissemination

Approvals of the study protocol were obtained from relevant local ethics and regulatory frameworks for each participating database. The results of the study will be submitted to peer-reviewed scientific publications and presented at scientific conferences.

Cardiac adverse events associated with remdesivir in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Por: Yang · C. · Lapp · L. · Amstutz · A. · Briel · M. · Shannon · C. P. · Zhao · H. · Espin · E. · Assadian · S. · Toma · M. · Tebbutt · S. J.
Objectives

To evaluate whether remdesivir is associated with cardiac adverse events (CAEs), addressing concerns raised by basic experiments, clinical case reports and observational studies.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

MEDLINE and Embase, searched from January 2020 to December 2023.

Study selection

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remdesivir with placebo or standard care in patients with COVID-19, with a primary focus on cardiac safety.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

We included RCTs that evaluated the safety of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19 . Eligible studies were those that compared remdesivir with placebo or standard care in adult patientsCOVID-19 . Inclusion criteria emphasised safety outcomes, particularly CAEs, as primary endpoints.

Data extraction and synthesis

Two reviewers independently extracted data. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Harms guidelines. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A random-effects model was used for data synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was the incidence of any CAEs, defined as a composite of all reported cardiac-related harms. Secondary outcomes included specific CAEs such as arrhythmias, heart failure and myocardial disorders.

Results

We identified 1698 studies, of which seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 4566 participants. The RoB was assessed across multiple domains, with four RCTs showing low risk and three showing moderate risk in specific areas. Pooled analysis revealed no significant association between remdesivir use and CAEs (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.04, p=0.118). Subgroup analyses showed consistent findings across different patient demographics and comorbidities. GRADE assessment indicated moderate certainty for overall CAEs, low certainty for arrhythmias and heart failure (due to imprecision and study-level bias), and very low certainty for myocardial disorders (due to small sample size and indirectness).

Conclusions

Contrary to preliminary concerns and case reports, our meta-analysis found no evidence of a statistically significant association between remdesivir and CAEs among patients with COVID-19 . These findings provide reassurance to clinicians regarding the safety profile of remdesivir in this patient population, supporting its use as an antiviral therapy in the treatment of COVID-19. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and to clarify whether remdesivir may have a neutral or potentially protective effect on cardiac outcomes.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42022383647.

Canadian Consensus Statement for the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers

ABSTRACT

To develop a concise Consensus Statement on the management of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) that incorporates existing standards and guidance on new technology, including improvement of calf muscle pump function and the utilisation of advanced wound therapies. A multidisciplinary panel of 19 wound healthcare providers from across Canada, who treat patients with VLUs, was formed. A draft document was created and four rounds of consultation and feedback were sought from the panel. The Consensus Statement was completed in June 2024 with 100% consensus on 20 sections and > 85% consensus on the remaining three sections. The key elements are—Clinical assessment and investigations; Treatment-compression to improve calf muscle pump function, and wound treatment with the principles of Wound Bed Preparation; When not healing or only suboptimal compression can be used - add treatment with muscle pump activator by continuous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the common peroneal nerve to improve calf muscle pump function; When VLUs are not healing with optimal therapy - an algorithm for the use of advanced wound therapies; and Prevention of VLU recurrence. The Consensus Statement is a concise guide for healthcare providers to use at the bedside and has been endorsed by leading nursing and homecare associations in Canada that also have physician representation.

Cutaneous Manifestations of COVID‐19: A Descriptive Analysis of a Southeastern USA Purposive Sample

ABSTRACT

This study describes characteristics and factors associated with cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 encountered across acute inpatient, and critical care units in a large Southeastern USA public hospital from March 1, 2020, through November 01, 2021. A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted on a purposive sample of patients consulted for non-pressure injury related cutaneous wounds while positive for COVID-19. Patients were predominantly male (64.3%, n = 27), White (66.7%, n = 28) and Black (33.3%). No cutaneous wounds while positive for COVID-19 were observed for Hispanic patients. Patient mortality was 71.4% (n = 30). Gender distribution was proportionate by gender (67% were male) and race (65.5% were White) for deceased patients. Body mass index (BMI) ranged from 15.8 to 61.2 with a mean of 31.9 (SD = 10.76) and median BMI 28.7. Identification of cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 and understanding of the retiform purpura pathophysiology could prove useful in guiding COVID-19 treatment regimens. Investigation into factors preventing complement cascading in those of Hispanic ethnicity may be useful in the prevention of CMC-19 and progression of severity of illness.

Assessing the Impact of an Integrated Community Care Program on Unplanned Hospital and Emergency Department Representations: Interrupted Time Series Analysis

ABSTRACT

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Community Care Program, which was the amalgamation of three outreach services—post-acute care, Residential In-Reach, and the Hospital Admission Risk Program—into a single integrated care model. Specifically, we assessed its effects on unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department re-presentations at 30-, 60- and 90-days post-enrolment.

Methods

A pragmatic, real-world, population-based observational study was conducted using an interrupted time series analysis. The study included 4708 adult patients across two periods: pre-amalgamation (November 2014–October 2016), and post-amalgamation (May 2017–October 2018). Data were sourced from the National Centre for Healthy Ageing Data Platform, with statistical analyses conducted using Generalised Least Squares models to account for autocorrelation.

Results

The study observed a significant increase in quarterly program enrolments post-amalgamation, from 578 to 1011 per quarter. The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 11.8% to 8.52% post-amalgamation. However, interrupted time series analysis revealed no statistically significant changes in the slopes of readmission and emergency department re-presentation rates after the program's amalgamation. The program did not result in significant changes in 60- or 90-day outcomes.

Conclusions

The amalgamation of post-acute care, Residential In-Reach, and the Hospital Admission Risk Program into the Community Care Program led to increased service utilisation without a significant impact on reducing unplanned hospital readmissions or emergency department re-presentations. Although the program amalgamation demonstrated improved accessibility, its longer-term impact remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for continuous refinement and further evaluation to optimise system efficiency. No patient or public contribution occurred in this study.

Reporting Method

This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines for observational research.

Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated With Intravenous Access First Attempt and Overall Success in Hospitalised Medical‐Surgical Adults

ABSTRACT

Aims

To determine patient and nursing factors associated with peripheral intravenous access success among hospitalised adults on medical-surgical units.

Design

A prospective, cross-sectional, correlational design was guided by STROBE.

Methods

Within a quaternary care hospital with multiple medical-surgical units, nurses who attempted intravenous access completed case report forms and medical records were reviewed to record 38 factors associated with intravenous access success. After identifying factors associated with first attempt and overall intravenous access success in univariate analyses, prediction models were fit and calibration (based on plots) and discrimination (using the C-statistic) were evaluated using bootstrap sampling.

Results

Of 394 adults, 244 (61.9%) had first attempt and 323 (82.0%) had overall intravenous access success. Ultrasound was used in 227 (57.6%) intravenous access attempts and use was associated with less vein visibility and palpability and higher nurse perception of difficult intravenous access. In multivariable modelling, four factors were associated with first attempt intravenous access success: using a wrist vein, higher nurse expertise in intravenous access, nurse use of an ultrasound in patients with high-risk vein characteristics, and higher nurse confidence in first attempt success; model goodness of fit was good. Seven factors were associated with overall intravenous access success: shorter patient hospital length of stay, no history of diabetes, higher patient anxiety level, nurse use of an ultrasound in patients with high-risk vein characteristics, higher nurse expertise in intravenous access, higher nurse confidence in first attempt success, and nurse prediction of difficult intravenous access was low; model goodness of fit was strong.

Conclusion

Patients' vein characteristics and nurses' confidence in first attempt intravenous access success were predominant characteristics of intravenous access success.

Implications

Factors of importance in achieving intravenous access can be easily assessed prior to first attempt and may enhance first attempt and overall success.

Reporting Method

Authors adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and used the following reporting method: STROBE (The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies).

Association between nurses’ personal, professional and work characteristics, and engagement in hospital‐based clinical research

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the associations between demographic, professional and other personal nurse characteristics, social support factors and comfort in conducting research with nurses' level of active participation in clinical research.

Design

A prospective, cross-sectional, correlational design was used.

Methods

Clinical nurses working in a multihospital healthcare system were recruited by email to complete an anonymous survey that used multiple valid and reliable scales to assess demographic and professional work characteristics, curiosity, grit, locus of control, perceived social support (for research activities), comfort in conducting research, and level of being research-active. Univariate and multivariable analyses were completed.

Results

Of 310 participants, 274 (88.4%) were female and mean (SD) age was 42.9 (13.1) years. After condensing 11 levels of research activity to four categories, 179 (57.7%) were not research-active, and 91 (29.4%), 26 (8.3%) and 14 (4.5%) were engaged at low, moderate, and high levels, respectively. Of 78 factors, 69 (88.5%) were associated with being research-active in univariate analyses. In multivariable analysis that adjusted for age, personal experience as a patient, years as a nurse and hours in direct patient care, professionalism characteristics, higher curiosity, internal locus of control, grit perseverance, support of a nurse scientist and nurse friends, and comfort in conducting research remained associated with higher levels of being research-active (all p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Research-active nurses were more likely to be engaged professionally in hospital-based activities beyond their work roles and displayed higher levels of positive psychological characteristics and mentorship that supported research capacity.

Clinical Relevance

Research-active nurses were more likely to have internal factors and external resources that promoted higher levels of being research-active. A strong professional governance model may enhance clinical nurses research activities.

A systematic review of reasons and risks for acute service use by older adult residents of long‐term care

Abstract

Aims and Objectives

To identify the reasons and/or risk factors for hospital admission and/or emergency department attendance for older (≥60 years) residents of long-term care facilities.

Background

Older adults' use of acute services is associated with significant financial and social costs. A global understanding of the reasons for the use of acute services may allow for early identification and intervention, avoid clinical deterioration, reduce the demand for health services and improve quality of life.

Design

Systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022326964) and reported following PRISMA guidelines.

Methods

The search strategy was developed in consultation with an academic librarian. The strategy used MeSH terms and relevant keywords. Articles published since 2017 in English were eligible for inclusion. CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection were searched (11/08/22). Title, abstract, and full texts were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria; data extraction was performed two blinded reviewers. Quality of evidence was assessed using the NewCastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

Thirty-nine articles were eligible and included in this review; included research was assessed as high-quality with a low risk of bias. Hospital admission was reported as most likely to occur during the first year of residence in long-term care. Respiratory and cardiovascular diagnoses were frequently associated with acute services use. Frailty, hypotensive medications, falls and inadequate nutrition were associated with unplanned service use.

Conclusions

Modifiable risks have been identified that may act as a trigger for assessment and be amenable to early intervention. Coordinated intervention may have significant individual, social and economic benefits.

Relevance to clinical practice

This review has identified several modifiable reasons for acute service use by older adults. Early and coordinated intervention may reduce the risk of hospital admission and/or emergency department.

Reporting method

This systematic review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology.

Patient or public contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Ageism directed at older nurses in their workplace: A systematic review

Abstract

Aims

To identify and synthesise evidence related to ageism in older regulated nurses' practice settings.

Design

A systematic review following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.

Methods

The review included empirical studies that involved older nurses as the primary study population and studies that focused on ageism in older nurses' work environments, including strategies or interventions to address ageism within the workplace. Following the initial screening, all relevant studies were critically appraised by two reviewers to ensure they were appropriate to include in the review. A synthesis without meta-analysis reporting (SWiM) guideline was employed in the review.

Data Sources

Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval Systems Online, Scopus, Psychological Information Database and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Google Scholar were searched to identify empirical studies and a range of academic institutional websites were accessed for master's and doctoral dissertations and theses. The search covered the period from January 2022 to May 2022, and only publications in English from 2000 onwards were considered.

Results

Nineteen studies were included, ten qualitative studies, seven quantitative studies and two mixed methods secondary analyses. Our results revealed that negative perceptions and beliefs about older nurses' competencies and skills prevail in their practice settings, which influences older nurses' health and well-being as well as their continuation of practice. Further, older nurses' continuation of practice can be facilitated by having a positive personal outlook on ageing, meaningful relationships in their practice settings and working in an environment that is age-inclusive.

Conclusion

To combat ageism in older nurses' practice settings and support their continuation of practice, effective interventions should be organisational-led. The interventions should focus on fostering meaningful relationships between older nurses and their colleagues and managers. Further, healthcare institutions should implement initiatives to promote an age-inclusive work environment that supports an age-diverse nursing workforce.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care

The review findings offer insights for healthcare managers, policymakers and researchers, emphasising the need for anti-ageism policies in healthcare organisations. According to WHO (2021), educational activities such as role-playing and simulation during in-service training may also be effective interventions. Additionally, incorporating anti-ageism initiatives into staff meetings and mandating anti-ageism training could support the continuation of practice for older nurses while fostering a more age-diverse nursing workforce.

Impact

We found evidence on the presence of ageism in older nurses' workplace and the detrimental effects of ageism on older nurses' well-being and continuation of practice. Importantly, we identified a lack of organisational initiatives to address ageism and support older nurses. These findings should encourage healthcare organisations to address ageism in older nurses' practice settings and prompt policymakers to develop age-inclusive policies that support older nurses' continuation of practice.

Reporting method

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis checklists were used to report the screening process.

Trial and Protocol Registration

The PROSPERO registration number for the review was CRD42022320214 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022320214).

No Patient or Public Contribution.

Provider cultural competence and humility in healthcare interactions with transgender and nonbinary young adults

Abstract

Purpose

Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) patients experience many barriers when seeking quality healthcare services, including ineffective communication and negative relationships with their providers as well as a lack of provider competence (including knowledge, training, and experience) and humility (engagement in the process of self-reflection and self-critique) in treating TGNB individuals. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify factors associated with cultural competence and humility that facilitate and impede effective relationships between TGNB young adults and their healthcare providers.

Methods

Data came from individual interviews with 60 young adults aged 18 to 24 from Florida who self-identified as transgender or nonbinary. We analyzed the data using inductive thematic approaches, and a feminist perspective, to identify themes associated with patient-provider relationships.

Conclusions

We identified 4 themes related to patient-provider relationships: (1) Participants indicated effective patient-provider communication and relationships are facilitated by providers requesting and utilizing TGNB patients' correct names and personal pronouns. (2) Participant narratives conveyed their preferences that providers “follow their lead” in terms of how they described their own anatomy, reinforcing the utility of cultural humility as an approach for interactions with TGNB patients (3) Participants discussed the detrimental effects of TGNB patients having to educate their own providers about their identities and needs, suggesting clinicians' competence regarding gender diversity is paramount to fostering and maintaining patient comfort. (4) Finally, participants' responses indicated concerns regarding the confidentiality and privacy of the information they provided to their providers, suggesting a lack of trust detrimental to the process of building rapport between patients and their providers.

Clinical Relevance

Our findings indicate balancing the use of cultural humility and cultural competence during clinical encounters with TGNB young adults can enhance patients' experiences seeking healthcare. Nursing education is often devoid of focus on caring for transgender and nonbinary persons. Additional provider training and education on approaching clinical encounters with TGNB patients with cultural humility and competence should improve patient-provider communication and relationships, leading to a higher quality of patient care.

❌