The enhanced midwifery continuity of carer (eMCoC) pilot programme provided additional resource (funding) to midwifery teams operating in the 10% most deprived areas in England. The eMCoC programme aims to provide additional support to those at greatest risk of poor maternal health outcomes. We conducted a rapid formative evaluation aiming to explore the implementation of the pilot programme to (1) generate timely insights to inform ongoing service delivery; (2) generate a logical framework of the eMCoC service and; (3) inform the design of a longer-term summative evaluation.

Rapid evaluation using mixed-methods.

We explored implementation of the eMCoC service in 58 funded local midwifery teams across 23 Local Maternity and Neonatal Systems (LMNS). We undertook qualitative data collection in 10 case study sites across England, focusing on the implementation in 17 teams.

We purposively sampled 34 service users who received care from enhanced teams, and 38 staff working in enhanced teams. Inclusion criteria for the service user interviews included women who had received care from enhanced teams during our evaluation period and were more than 28 weeks pregnant. Exclusion criteria included women who had not received care from our target teams. We undertook descriptive analysis using the Maternity Services Dataset to compare the characteristics of service users in enhanced teams with service users receiving other midwifery service models.

Many of the 58 teams funded were unable to implement eMCoC during the evaluation period because of institutional and organisational barriers. The barriers identified here are indicative of the barriers associated with implementing midwifery continuity of carer. Largely, the eMCoC service successfully targeted women living in the most deprived areas and a focus on reaching women living in these areas was valued by enhanced teams. Equally, enhanced teams strived to broaden the targeted characteristics (i.e. more broadly than on the basis of deprivation) to include a wider and more diverse set of social risk factors and vulnerabilities, based on local needs and priorities. Service users reported being well supported by the enhanced teams, including receiving relational and well-being support and personalised one-to-one public health education, information and support. Service users emphasised that enhanced teams went ‘above and beyond in their care’.

Funding for eMCoC has been well received by both staff and service users. The implementation of the enhanced roles was perceived to have supported delivery of team-based care, facilitating successful release of midwifery capacity and the delivery of additional public health activities. Supporting a team-focused ethos seems an important feature of eMCoC services. This was consistent across sites and from both staff and service user perspectives. There appears to be many routes (i.e. different service delivery types) to delivering enhanced care, and the multiplicity of service delivery types found in this evaluation suggests no tightly prescribed way of meeting eMCoC’s objectives. The flexibility of the initial funding specification guidance from NHS England has been a key driver of local ownership and permitted eMCoC services to be organically built ‘from the ground up’. Our conclusions point to the value of autonomy afforded to local areas to use eMCoC funding as they deem necessary to best suit the needs of their staff and specific service user groups. Attention should be placed on the barriers to implementation and sustainability issues which can be addressed, namely: delays in releasing funding from LMNS and Integrated Care Boards to providers, and protecting maternity support worker and midwifery time to their allocated teams.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide and genetic factors and family history significantly increase the risk of PCa. Men at increased risk for PCa often experience higher PCa-specific anxiety and distress. Comprehensive prevention strategies for men with familial or genetic PCa predisposition are lacking. Consequently, the psychological impact, facilitators and barriers for risk-adapted PCa prevention lack comprehensive study. The novel prospective registry and prevention clinic ‘ProFam-Risk’ (prevention clinic for familial PCa risk) at the University Hospital Düsseldorf offers personalised risk assessment and risk-adapted prevention recommendations for men with familial or genetic PCa predisposition. As part of this research project, this study (‘ProFam-Psych’ - risk-adapted prevention clinic for familial and genetic prostate cancer: psychosocial effects; funded by German Cancer Aid) aims to evaluate the longitudinal psychosocial trajectories associated with this novel prevention clinic.

In a longitudinal observational mixed-methods design, psychosocial outcomes will be assessed in participants of the prevention clinic (case group, CAG) and compared with urology patients without increased risk for PCa (control group, COG). Psychosocial outcomes will be collected at four time points in the CAG (T0: baseline; T1: after first visit; T2: after risk stratification consultation; T3: follow-up 6 months after T2) and at two time points in the COG (T0: baseline during inpatient stay; T1: post-inpatient stay). Recruitment started in 2023, and the recruitment target is n=225 participants (CAG) and n=118 participants (COG). Primary endpoint is the longitudinal course of PCa-specific anxiety (Memorial Anxiety Questionnaire for Prostate Cancer) in the CAG. Secondary endpoints include the comparison of T0 and T1 outcomes between the CAG and COG and the assessment of changes in perceived PCa risk and perceived personal control in the CAG. To assess facilitators and barriers to participation in the risk-adapted PCa prevention clinic, a minimum of n=12 semi-structured qualitative interviews will be conducted, with recruitment continuing until data saturation is reached. Qualitative data will be analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Ethics approval from the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf was obtained (2023-2551). Results of the main objective and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

DRKS.de, DRKS00032350. Prospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 14 September 2023.