FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerBMJ Open

Platinum and etoposide chemotherapy, durvalumab with thoracic radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: CHEST-RT (TROG 20.01) Trial - protocol for a phase II study

Por: Parakh · S. · Gee · H. · Lim · A. · Vinod · S. · Wheeler · C. · Rooney · B. · Montgomery · R. · Harden · S. · Moore · M. · Lehman · M. · Bettington · C. · Moodie · T. · Barber · J. · Schmidt · L. · Dizon · J. · Leigh · L. · Oldmeadow · C. · Mitchell · P. · Hau · E.
Background

Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 20.01 CHEST-RT (Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Extensive Stage Small cell with Thoracic Radiotherapy) is a single-arm, open-label, prospective, multicentre phase II trial study that aims to establish the safety, feasibility and describe the efficacy of incorporating thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) (concurrent or sequential) to chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

A single arm of up to 30 evaluable participants given TRT concurrent or sequentially with chemoimmunotherapy will be enrolled. Participants should commence radiotherapy with cycle 3 or cycle 4 of chemotherapy. Those not suitable for concurrent radiotherapy due to large tumour volumes may receive sequential radiotherapy. Accounting for a 15% non-evaluable rate, up to 35 participants will be enrolled. An independent data and safety monitoring committee will review the data and assess safety and feasibility. Progression to a phase III trial would be considered feasible if ≤20% of participants experienced ≥grade 3 oesophageal toxicity and ≤10% experienced ≥grade 3 pneumonitis. This approach would be considered feasible if there is ≤20% treatment discontinuation of systemic therapy secondary to radiation toxicities and ≥75% of participants have tumour volumes that can be safely treated to a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary outcome of the trial is safety and feasibility, and survival and responses will be assessed as secondary endpoints. A predefined subgroup analysis of toxicity will be performed on group 1 (concurrent TRT) versus group 2 participants (consolidation TRT).

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Peter MacCallum Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/73189/PMCC-2021). The protocol, technical and clinical data will be disseminated by conference presentations and publications. Any modifications to the protocol will be formally documented by administrative letters and will be submitted to the approving HREC for review and approval.

Trial registration numbers

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000586819) and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT05796089).

Multicentre pragmatic embedded stepped wedge cluster randomised trial comparing glucose 5% with sodium chloride 0.9% as the default drug diluent in the ICU: the sweet-water trial protocol

Por: Hardenberg · J.-H. B. · Hinz · R. M. · Pigorsch · M. · Uhrig · A. · Müller-Redetzky · H. · Nee · J. · Schroeder · T. · Witzenrath · M. · Trost · U. · Zickler · D. · Hunsicker · O. · Weiss · B. · Weber-Carstens · S. · Spies · C. · Tampe · B. · Borgstedt · R. · Abu-Tair · M. · Zarbock · A
Introduction

Hypernatraemia, defined as a plasma sodium concentration >145 mmol/L, is a frequent complication in critically ill patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) (= ICU-acquired hypernatraemia), with reported prevalence ranging from 4% to 26%. Hypernatraemia adversely affects various physiological functions and is associated with delirium, prolonged length of stay and increased ICU and post-discharge mortality. The sodium load from intravenous drug diluents significantly contributes to ICU-acquired hypernatraemia, with drug infusions comprising about 30% of the daily fluid volume of an average ICU patient. This study aims to investigate if using glucose 5% solution as the default drug diluent, instead of sodium chloride 0.9%, can reduce the prevalence of ICU-acquired hypernatraemia and improve patient outcomes.

Methods and analysis

To test the effectiveness of glucose 5% solution as the default drug diluent, we will conduct a multicentre, pragmatic, embedded, open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial. The study will include twelve clusters (ICUs and one intermediate care unit) across six hospitals in Germany, with a projected total sample size of 4485 patients. In line with the stepped-wedge cluster-randomised design, one ICU will transition every 4 weeks, in a randomised sequence, from using sodium chloride 0.9% as the default drug diluent to glucose 5%.

The primary endpoint is the prevalence of hypernatraemia >150 mmol/L through day 28. The number of days alive and free of the ICU through day 28 will be tested hierarchically as a key secondary endpoint. Other exploratory endpoints include ICU mortality, ICU-free days, hospital-free days and other clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint will be analysed using a logistic mixed-effects model.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial was approved by the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin Ethics Board and by the ethics board of each enrolled hospital. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

The trial protocol was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register on 21 June 2024 prior to initiation of patient enrolment (DRKS00033397).

Randomised controlled trial of a nurse coordination intervention for people living with dementia and their carers: study protocol

Por: Carey · M. L. · Kelly · M. · Pond · D. · Nair · B. R. · Attia · J. · Jeon · Y.-H. · Deeming · S. · Rhee · J. J. · Wales · K. · Khaing · K. · Williams · A. · White · J. · Harden · M. · Ford · C. · Ward · J. · Lithgow · S. · Oldmeadow · C. · Jalewa · J. · Smart · E. · Wood · K. · Bartczak · A. · F
Introduction

The multifaceted impact of dementia means that people living with dementia require multidisciplinary care across different services and settings; however, these care transitions pose a risk of fragmented care. Models that improve integration and coordination of care in the community are needed.

Methods and analysis

This randomised control trial will test the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a dementia nurse-led intervention to: (1) increase days lived in the community at 12-month follow-up (primary outcome) among people living with dementia and (2) improve quality of life for people living with dementia and their carers, compared with usual care. Participants are recruited from several sources including private and public geriatric medicine clinics, carer support groups and self-referral. People living with dementia and their carers are randomised as a dyad to (1) usual care or (2) dementia nurse-led care-coordination. The dementia nurse will provide care coordination and direct support through a tailored, integrated and patient-centred approach. The needs of people living with dementia will be identified and addressed, with a focus on improving the management of comorbidities, risk reduction and symptoms. Carers will also receive support. The model for people living with dementia will focus on days lived in their community as the outcome variable. Differences between groups in quality of life at 12-month follow-up will be assessed using linear mixed effects regression. Analysis will follow the intention to treat principles. People living with dementia and carers’ data will be analysed separately and collectively for the economic study.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial has been approved by the Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH01221) and the University of Newcastle Ethics Committee (R-2024–0021). Trial findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. If the intervention is effective, the research team aims to further implement the intervention as usual care within the participating services and beyond.

Trial registration number

The trial was prospectively registered via the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12624000235505. Registration date: 11 March 2024.

❌