The mental health first aid (MHFA) training is an evidence-based programme that is known to improve undergraduate students’ attitudes towards mental illness and confidence in helping people with mental health problems. MHFA training will be implemented at a university in Hong Kong to address growing concerns about mental health challenges among students. Given the context of a university-wide systematic MHFA training implementation, this evaluation uses an intervention logic framework to evaluate the processes and longitudinal outcomes.

A mixed-method approach will be used where the quantitative component will gather data from a review of records and a case-control study for outcome evaluation; the qualitative component will gather data from individual interviews. All first-year students from the university in the academic year 2024–2025 (ie, September 2024 to August 2025) will be enrolled in the mandatory MHFA training. The outcome evaluation will assess effectiveness through short-, intermediate- and long-term outcomes. An online questionnaire will be distributed to the students before (pre) and immediately after (post) the MHFA training. For comparison, second-year students who had not participated in MHFA training will be invited to complete the same online questionnaire. The questionnaires will be administered further to those who completed the MHFA training at 12 months (ie, academic year 2025–2026) and 24 months (ie, academic year 2026–2027) post-training to evaluate intermediate-term and long-term effects, respectively. The process evaluation explores feasibility, fidelity, adoption and the barriers and enablers to implementation.

This evaluation has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Hong Kong Metropolitan University (reference number HE-SF2024/35). The findings are expected to contribute to establishing long-term effects on mental health literacy and on the actual mental health support actions provided by participants, which goes beyond the intention to help. This evaluation would also facilitate a better understanding of the processes that need to be considered in a systematic MHFA training implementation in a university context. The findings will be disseminated in academic and public health community settings.

This project has been registered in the Open Science Framework. Fully anonymised data will be saved and subsequently made available through the following OSF registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/92N5Q.

Prognosis estimation is the basis for establishing the personal interventions in sepsis patients. Serum biomarkers are potential tools for predicting the outcomes of sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Here, we plan to perform a prospective study to investigate the prognostic value of serum biomarkers. We named this study Hospital Outcome of Host Heterogeneity, Organ dysfunction and Trajectory in sepsis (HOHHOT).

This prospective cohort study is being performed in several hospitals in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region between 2025 and 2027. The inclusion criteria were adult sepsis patients admitted to the ICU. A serum specimen will be collected at the onset of sepsis and stored at –80°C for future use. The endpoint of the HOHHOT study includes, but is not limited to, hospital outcome (eg, mortality, occurrence of organ dysfunction, treatment response and the progression of sepsis). We will analyse the predictive value of serum biomarkers for outcomes using a receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis. The association between baseline characteristics and serum biomarkers will be estimated using a logistic regression model, net reclassification index and integrated discriminatory index. We will also construct some predictive models using machine learning algorithms.

The HOHHOT study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University (NO: KY2025005). The findings derived from the HOHHOT study will be submitted to international academic journals.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500100770); pre-results.

The financial impact on trauma patients can be devastating. Although Taiwan has universal health insurance coverage, medical bill reimbursement cannot compensate for the damage to a person’s ability to work. The aim of this study was to investigate personal financial outcomes after major trauma.

A retrospective cohort study.

Nationwide data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database.

This study included all patients with major trauma (injury severity score ≥16) in Taiwan from 2003 to 2007, and a 10-year follow-up was conducted. Patients aged 18–70 were enrolled. Patients who returned to work after trauma (RTW) and those who did not return to work (non-RTW) were compared. Basic demographics and short-term outcomes were analysed, and the 10-year trend of income variation was calculated.

The primary outcomes are the ratio of non-RTW after major trauma, and the independent risk factors for non-RTW. The secondary outcome is the 10-year trend of income variation of major trauma patients.

5965 patients were included, with 4741 (79.5%) in the RTW group and 1224 (20.5%) in the non-RTW group. Hospital-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection, prolonged intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) and prolonged hospital LOS were identified as independent risk factors for future non-RTW. The mean monthly income of all patients declined in the three consecutive years postinjury and slowly returned to the preinjury level 9 years after the injury.

Loss of working ability was noted in 20.5% of major trauma patients, and the income level for all patients did not recover to the preinjury level until 9 years after the injury. Further welfare planning beyond the extent of the National Health Insurance programme should be made to protect the financial shortcomings experienced by these patients.

ISRCTN18269986.

Treatment expectations are a key mechanism of placebo effects in clinical trials. In a previous study (PSY-HEART-I), preoperative expectation optimisation improved quality of life 6 months postcardiac surgery. However, barriers such as travel distance, staffing shortages and COVID-19 limited participation. This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of iEXPECT, a brief internet-based intervention designed to optimise expectations before heart surgery.

In this three-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial, 160 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery are randomised to: (a) standard of care (SOC); (b) SOC plus iEXPECT with phone-based guidance (iEXPECT enhanced) or (c) SOC plus iEXPECT with email-based guidance (iEXPECT limited). The intervention includes four 20 min online modules addressing surgical benefits, side effects and coping strategies. Modules are accompanied by personalised guidance provided through feedback on each module via email or telephone (three before surgery, three booster sessions at 6, 12 and 18 weeks postsurgery). Assessments occur at baseline (5–21 days before surgery), preoperatively (day before surgery), 7 days postsurgery and 6 months later. Primary feasibility outcomes include recruitment (≥1 participant/week/centre), retention (≥49% completing 6-month follow-up including biomarkers) and engagement (≥75% completing ≥1 presurgery module). Acceptability is measured by self-reported enjoyment, usefulness and impact, with acceptance defined as mean scores >3.4 (5-point Likert scale) and CSQ-I ratings. Secondary outcomes include psychological measures, inflammatory markers and heart rate variability.

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committees of Philipps University Marburg (AZ 229/23 BO) and the University of Giessen (AZ 186/23). All participants provide written informed consent. Results will be shared via publications, conferences and public outreach with relevant consumer advocacy groups.

DRKS00033284.

Hospital-based nurses and midwives play a pivotal role in promoting, protecting and supporting breastfeeding. However, variation in preservice education, in-service training and institutional policies contributes to inconsistent breastfeeding support across healthcare systems. Given the global push toward improving breastfeeding outcomes and the centrality of skilled nursing support, this scoping review protocol aims to systematically map the breadth, characteristics and reported outcomes of breastfeeding education and training initiatives targeting hospital-based nurses and midwives.

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley and advanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). A systematic search will be conducted across major databases including OVID Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science, as well as grey literature sources. Studies will be selected using the Population–Concept–Context (PCC) framework, focusing on breastfeeding-related education and training interventions designed for nurses and midwives in hospital settings. Two independent reviewers will screen all titles, abstracts and full texts, extract data using a standardised tool and resolve discrepancies via discussion or third-party consultation. The extracted data will be analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic synthesis to identify trends, gaps and directions for future research. The literature search will be conducted between August and October 2025.

This scoping review involves the analysis of existing literature and does not require ethical approval. The findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentations at nursing and maternal–child health conferences to inform educators, hospital administrators and policy makers involved in breastfeeding support and clinical education.

Hospitalisation is one of the most stressful life events for older adults, particularly for those who are pre-frail or frail. Multi-component community-based interventions have the potential to address the complex needs of older adults post-acute care admission. While some available interventions have been developed with end-user engagement, fully involving older people who are pre-frail or frail in the design of interventions has been less common. Multi-component community-based interventions that address the needs of older adults and their care partners with potential implementation barriers informed by healthcare providers, community partners and health system decision makers are needed. This protocol paper describes the planned process of co-designing for older patients discharged into the community, a Post-Acute Care Intervention for Frailty using Information and Communication technology.

The development of a complex multi-component frailty intervention which meets older people’s needs involves several concurrent tasks and methodologies, each informed by co-design and conducted with consideration to eventual implementation. These tasks include: (1) establishing a Research Advisory Board, (2) assessing the feasibility and validity of using hospital administrative data to identify frail or pre-frail older adults and their needs, (3) conducting a needs assessment of patients returning to the community, (4) mapping community assets to identify existing programmes and services to help tailor the intervention, (5) co-designing a multicomponent frailty intervention, (6) selecting study outcome measures and (7) selecting and tailoring a digital health patient portal to support intervention delivery, data capture and communication.

Each task requiring ethics approval will be submitted to the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board at McMaster University. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, conferences and networks of relevant knowledge users who have the capacity to promote dissemination of the results. A toolkit will be developed to help researchers and healthcare providers replicate the methodology for other populations.