Conectar
Participation in physical activity (PA) is a cornerstone of the secondary prevention of stroke. Given the heterogeneous nature of stroke, PA interventions that are adaptive to individual performance capability and associated co-morbidity levels are recommended. Mobile health (mHealth) has been identified as a potential approach to supporting PA post-stroke. To this end, we used a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial design to develop an adaptive, mHealth intervention to improve PA post-stroke – The Adaptive Physical Activity programme in Stroke (TAPAS) (Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT05606770). As the first trial in stroke recovery literature to use this design, there is an opportunity to conduct a process evaluation for this type of adaptive intervention. The aim of this process evaluation is to examine the implementation process, mechanism of change and contextual influences of TAPAS among ambulatory people with stroke in the community.
Guided by the Medical Research Council Framework for process evaluations, qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to examine the (1) implementation process and the content of TAPAS (fidelity adaptation, dose and reach); (2) mechanisms of change (participants’ response to the intervention; mediators; unexpected pathways and consequences) and (3) influence of the context of the intervention. Quantitative data will be presented descriptively, for example, adherence to exercise sessions. Qualitative data will be collected among TAPAS participants and the interventionist using semi-structured one-to-one or focus group interviews. Transcribed interviews will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Key themes and sub-themes will be developed.
Ethical approval has been granted by the Health Service Executive Mid-Western Ethics Committee (REC Ref: 026/2022) (25/03/2024). The findings will be submitted for publication and presented at relevant national and international academic conferences.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) has been linked to increased frequencies of sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs) (≤50% after paraplegia and ≤90% following tetraplegia). However, SRBDs have been under-recognised and undertreated among individuals with SCI. The OPTIMISE SCI (Outcomes Post Treatment: Impact on Motor Impairment of Sleep Efficiency in SCI) is an ongoing phase 3 clinical trial focused on the effects of the early use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy to treat individuals with moderate-to-severe SRBDs in the acute/subacute stage after SCI.
A total of 44 participants with SCI who are newly diagnosed with moderate-to-severe SRBD are randomised into early CPAP therapy (initiated within the first 8 weeks postinjury) versus delayed CPAP therapy (initiated at 6 months postinjury). Participants with no/mild SRBDs are included in the control group (n=22). Primary outcome measures include neurological and functional recovery after SCI.
The protocol for this randomised clinical trial (RCT) raised an interesting discussion with our research ethics board about delaying CPAP therapy by 3 months when a participant is diagnosed with moderate-to-severe SRBD. Given that the current standard of care does not include screening for SRBDs in individuals who are admitted for spinal cord rehabilitation, most individuals are screened for SRBDs during the chronic stage post-SCI, which represents a greater delay in the diagnosis and treatment of SRBDs in this population. Because the potential impact of the OPTIMISE SCI trial on the current standard of care outweighs the risk of delaying CPAP therapy by 3 months, this trial protocol was approved. The dissemination plan includes presentations at scientific meetings and publication of the results in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05473689).
Remote assessment of surgical site infection(SSI) lacks sensitivity for the diagnosis of SSI, but current evidence has not evaluated whether a combination of photographs and questionnaires improves diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to develop a remote diagnostic measure to identify SSI. A two-phase mixed methods study was conducted. In phase I, five clinicians reviewed the Bluebelle wound healing questionnaire(WHQ) on a five-point Likert scale of agreement for inclusion in a remote measure. Discussion generated a hypothesis as to which items should be included. In phase II, a cohort study, whereby clinicians evaluated patient's wound images and patients completed the WHQ, were reviewed for scale structure. Principal component analysis (PCA) with scree plot examination and maximum likelihood of estimation (MLE) for one, two and three factors were evaluated. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α. Phase I: hypothesis generation estimated a measure containing between 10 and 12 items would include all relevant items without ambiguity or redundancy. Phase II: a combined sample of 570 responses provided clinician reviewed images and patient responses. PCA suggested that a 12-item measure with a combined variance of 60.2% would have the best model fit. Cronbach's α was high at 0.841. One included item was highlighted as potentially ambiguous in phase I (wound pain), providing an additional model with this removed. MLE for one, two and three factors suggested measures with 8, 10 and 11 items, respectively. Total variances were low at 29.7%, 39.8% and 41.4% and Cronbach's α were high at 0.838, 0.827 and 0.823, respectively. Three potential models for a remote diagnostic measure were identified. Each is shorter than alternative available measures, which have not been designed for combined use, ensuring this is easy to use. Further evaluation for reliability and diagnostic accuracy is needed to validate a final measure that can be implemented in clinical practice.
To gain a greater understanding of how compression therapy affects quality of life, this systematic review appraised existing published studies measuring the impact of compression therapy on health quality of life (HRQoL), and pain, among people with venous leg ulcers (VLU).
Five databases were searched, and two authors extracted data and appraised the quality of selected papers using the RevMan risk of bias tool. Due to heterogeneity in the types of compression and instruments used to evaluate HRQoL, meta-analysis was not appropriate; thus, a narrative synthesis of findings was undertaken.
Ten studies were included, 9 RCTs and one before-after study. The studies employed nine different HRQoL tools to measure the impact of a variety of compression therapy systems, with or without an additional exercise programme, versus other compression systems or usual care, and the results are mixed. With the use of the Cardiff Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule, the SF-8 and the SF-12, study authors found no differences in QoL scores between the study groups. This is similar to one study using QUALYs (Iglesias et al., 2004). Conversely, for studies using EuroQol-5D, VEINES-QOL, SF-36 and CIVIQ-20 differences in QoL scores between the study groups were noted, in favour of the study intervention groups. Two further studies using QUALYs found results that favoured a two-layer cohesive compression bandage and the TLCCB group, respectively. Results for the five studies that assessed pain are also mixed, with one study finding no difference between study groups, one finding that pain increased over the study period and three studies finding that pain reduced in the intervention groups. All studies were assessed as being at risk of bias in one or more domains.
Results were varied, reflecting uncertainty in determining the impact of compression therapy on quality of life and pain among people with a venous leg ulcer. The heterogeneity of the compression systems and the measures used to evaluate HRQoL make it a challenge to interpret the overall evidence. Further studies should strive for homogeneity in design, interventions and comparators to enhance both internal and external validity.
FreshRSS 