Cost and utilization analysis of concurrent versus staged testicular prosthesis implantation for radical orchiectomy

by Vi Nguyen, Arman Walia, Joshua J. Horns, Niraj Paudel, Aditya Bagrodia, Darshan P. Patel, Tung-Chin Hsieh, James M. Hotaling

American Urological Association guidelines recommend testicular prosthesis discussion prior to orchiectomy. Utilization may be low. We compared outcomes and care utilization between concurrent implant (CI) and staged implant (SI) insertion after radical orchiectomy.

The MarketScan Commercial claims database (2008–2017) was queried for men ages >18 years who underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular mass, stratified as orchiectomy with no implant, CI, or SI. 90-day outcomes included rate of reoperation, readmission, emergency department (ED) presentation, and outpatient visits. Regression models provided rate ratio comparison.

8803 patients (8564 no implant, 190 CI, 49 SI; 2.7% implant rate) were identified with no difference in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, insurance plan, additional cancer treatment, or metastasis. Median perioperative cost at orchiectomy (+/- implant) for no implant, CI, and SI were $5682 (3648–8554), $7823 (5403–10973), and $5380 (4130–10521), respectively (p Conclusions

CI placement has less total perioperative cost, lower explant rate, and similar postoperative utilization to SI.