To estimate the healthcare costs associated with post-stroke dysphagia during acute hospitalisation and to identify factors influencing these costs in a tertiary hospital setting in Vietnam.
A cross-sectional study using clinical and billing data from hospital records.
The study was conducted at the Neurology Center of Bach Mai Hospital, a tertiary care facility in Hanoi, Vietnam, between June 2020 and January 2022.
A total of 951 patients aged ≥18 years with acute ischaemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI were included. Dysphagia was assessed using the Gugging Swallowing Screen.
Direct healthcare costs during hospitalisation were collected from the hospital billing system and categorised as medications, diagnostic imaging, medical supplies, accommodation, food, procedures and laboratory tests. All costs were converted to USD. Associations between patient characteristics and total healthcare costs were analysed using generalised linear models (Gamma distribution with log link), applying robust standard errors.
The median treatment cost was 10.08 million VND (436.24 USD) in the dysphagia group vs 6.37 million VND (275.78 USD) in the non-dysphagia group. Costs increased with dysphagia severity, reaching 22.64 million VND (979.49 USD) among patients with severe dysphagia. In multivariate analysis, dysphagia was associated with a 21% increase in costs (exp(β) = 1.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.33; p14, pneumonia, prolonged hospitalisation and higher educational level.
Post-stroke dysphagia substantially increases acute hospitalisation costs in Vietnam. Early screening, standardised management and preventive care for complications may improve outcomes and reduce costs.
The study was registered on the Research Registry website (https://www.researchregistry.com/) under the unique identification number: researchregistry8203.
Scoliosis-specific exercises require specialist supervision, frequent clinical visits, and high costs, limiting accessibility. Additionally, females with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) engage in less physical activity (PA) than sex- and age-matched peers, leading to poorer bone and muscle health. These challenges underscore the need for accessible, home-based interventions targeting both musculoskeletal health and spinal alignment.
This single-blinded, randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the efficacy of a 16-week home-based exercise intervention on bone mineral density (BMD), Cobb angle, spinal flexibility, core muscle endurance, lean body mass, and quality of life (QoL) in females with IS. 28 participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). Both groups will perform Schroth and core stabilisation exercises three times per week, while the IG will additionally perform impact-loading exercises. The primary outcome is BMD. Secondary outcomes include Cobb angle, lean body mass, cosmetic trunk deformity, spinal flexibility, core muscle endurance, and QoL. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention, with interim evaluations (excluding BMD, Cobb angle, and lean body mass) conducted at weeks 4, 8, and 12. All assessors, radiologists, and statisticians will remain blinded to group allocation. Treatment effects between groups over time will be analysed using two-way mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA).
This study addresses a critical gap in IS management by integrating a preventive and therapeutic home-based programme. The approach aims to improve musculoskeletal health, spinal alignment, and overall QoL. Its accessible format may inform future guidelines for conservative treatment and early intervention. Such interventions could significantly enhance bone health, reduce the risk of progression, and improve long-term musculoskeletal outcomes in young females with mild to moderate IS.
This study has received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University (No. AMSEC-67EX-045). The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication.
TCTR20241001001.
The interaction between dementia and changes in health status accelerates the progression of dementia and health deterioration. Although health indicators exist for older adults, comprehensive ones for dementia are lacking.
To (1) establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia, (2) develop an integrated health assessment toolkit for older adults with dementia, and (3) test the feasibility and applicability of the integrated health assessment toolkit.
This study involved two phases. In the first phase, using the Delphi method, opinions from 10 experts were synthesized to establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia. In the second phase, with a descriptive research approach, an integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, evaluated by 10 daycare case managers for feasibility, and then pilot tested with 50 older adults with dementia across three daycare centers.
The core health indicators for older adults with dementia covered 18 indicators in five domains: (1) cognitive and behavioral impairment, (2) sensory and perceptual impairment, (3) disease and dysfunction, (4) functional fitness deterioration, and (5) social isolation. After two rounds of assessments, experts rated the criteria's importance and clarity at 0.94 and 0.89 on the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA), respectively. In the second phase, the integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, which integrated five observational assessment scales and six physical function measures. The average applicability scores ranged from 7.80 to 9.90 out of 10. In the pilot test, the assessment process proceeded smoothly without any adverse events. However, 10 participants did not comply with wearing the actigraphy device.
The core health indicators and the corresponding health assessment toolkit are feasible to assess the health of older adults with dementia that could provide valuable insights and guide future interventions to enhance their well-being.
To systematically analyse expert perspectives on paediatric-friendly care in the emergency department and establish specific indicators.
With an increasing number of children seeking emergency care, nurses must understand the specific needs of paediatric patients and their families.
A two-round modified Delphi method was used in this study.
In this study, experts from clinical practice and academia assessed 56 paediatric-friendly care criteria in the emergency department. Data were collected to establish a consensus and ensure content validity.
Thirty experts completed two survey rounds with response rates of 100% and 93.3%, respectively. In the initial survey, no consensus was reached for eight items. After the items were consolidated, 37 paediatric emergency-friendly care needs were identified. For each need, the item-level content validity index exceeded 0.79 for importance and feasibility. The average scale-level content validity index values were 0.95 and 0.92 for importance and feasibility. These needs were categorised into six dimensions: timely comfort (3 items), emotional care (5 items), frontline safety (11 items), emergency response (10 items), human resources support (5 items) and treatment efficiency (3 items).
Paediatric emergency nurses play a vital role in caring for children, improving soft skills through compassion and training and ensuring a well-equipped, safe environment in the emergency department.
This study offers valuable insights for emergency department nurses on the needs of children and their families, emphasising the importance of patient and family education, environmental considerations and the role of certified child life specialists in supporting the emergency healthcare team and ensuring appropriate paediatric care.
No direct patient, service user, caregiver or public involvement existed in this study.
To describe the characteristics and perceived effectiveness of clinical supervision mental health nurses are receiving and further explore any statistical correlations between the perceived effectiveness and satisfaction with the supervisee, supervisor and supervision characteristics.
A cross-sectional survey.
An online survey was distributed to nurses working in public mental health services in Victoria, Australia. A universal recruitment approach was used, and 422 nurses participated in the survey. Of these, 220 nurses who are participating in clinical supervision were eligible for the MCSS-26 survey.
A licensed MCSS-26 questionnaire.
Mental health nurses in the studied environment were likely to receive individual supervision from a senior mental health nurse, with the most common frequency being monthly for 31–60 min, and half receiving it within their workplace location. Half of the participants chose their own supervisor. Our findings indicate that nurses who engage in clinical supervision outside of their immediate workplace and receive individual supervision from a nurse of the same grade perceive higher effectiveness. We also found that clinical nurses may find it most difficult to engage in effective clinical supervision due to time constraints.
This study uniquely contributes to the current clinical supervision literature by reporting the uptake and detailed characteristics of supervision, a facet often overlooked in existing research.
This study reported the characteristics of the supervision, supervisor and the supervisee that are associated with the effective clinical supervision. These insights can lead to tailored implementation strategies that consider the specific roles and settings of nurses.
CROSS (Sharma et al. 2021).
No patient or public contribution.
Fatigue is a common symptom in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. However, previous studies report inconsistent patterns of fatigue change.
The aim of this study was to estimate changes in fatigue among patients with cancer before, during, and after radiotherapy.
Five databases (PubMed, SDOL, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Medline [ProQuest], and ProQuest Dissertations) were searched for studies published from January 2006 to May 2021. Three effect sizes of fatigue change (immediate, short-term, and long-term) were calculated for each primary study using standardized mean difference. A random-effect model was used to combine effect sizes across studies. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify potential categorical and continuous moderators, respectively.
Sixty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The weighted mean effect size for immediate, short-term, and long-term effects was 0.409 (p < .001; 95% CI [0.280, 0.537]), 0.303 (p < .001; 95% CI [0.189, 0.417]), and 0.201 (p = .05; 95% CI [−0.001, 0.404]), respectively. Studies with prostate cancer patients had a significantly higher short-term (0.588) and long-term weight mean effect size (0.531) than studies with breast (0.128, −0.072) or other cancers (0.287, 0.215). Higher radiotherapy dosage was significantly associated with a higher effect size for both immediate (β = .0002, p < .05) and short-term (β = .0002, p < .05) effect.
Findings from this meta-analysis indicated that radiotherapy-induced fatigue (RIF) exist for more than 3 months after the completion of treatment. Assessment of radiation-induced fatigue in cancer patients should extend long after treatment completion, especially for patients with prostate cancer and patients receiving a higher radiation dose. Interventions to reduce fatigue tailored for different treatment phases may be developed.