The effectiveness of brief reminiscence‐based psychosocial interventions for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

Aim

To determine the effectiveness of brief reminiscence-based psychosocial interventions in alleviating psychological distress in cancer patients.

Background

Cancer patients suffer tremendous psycho-spiritual pain, which affects their quality of life. Brief reminiscence-based psychosocial interventions have demonstrated positive effects on the mental health of cancer patients; however, the efficacy of these interventions has been inconsistent.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

This review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 checklist provided by the EQUATOR network. The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus databases were systematically searched from inception to 27 November 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English.

Results

Twenty studies involving 1744 cancer participants were included. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant effects of brief reminiscence-based psychosocial interventions on hope, anxiety and depression at post-intervention. A separate analysis revealed that brief reminiscence-based psychosocial interventions had a sustainable effect on hope, spiritual well-being, anxiety and depression at 1 month after the intervention. However, no statistically significant effect on quality of life was found in our study either immediately after the intervention or at 1 month.

Conclusions

Brief reminiscence-based psychosocial interventions can significantly reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms and improve hope and spiritual well-being in cancer patients.

Relevance to Clinical Practice

This study further supports that brief reminiscence-based psychosocial interventions should be incorporated into the routine care of cancer patients to address their psychosocial distress.

Patient or Public Contribution

All authors of this article contributed to the study conception and design. All authors of the included studies provided original data for this paper.

PCAT‐1′ s role in wound healing impairment: Mitochondrial dysfunction and bone marrow stem cell differentiation inhibition via PKM2/β‐catenin pathway and its impact on implant osseo‐integration

Abstract

This study focused on unravelling the role of PCAT-1 in wound-healing process, particularly its impact on regenerative and osteogenic abilities of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We delved into how PCAT-1 regulates mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and interacts with pivotal molecular pathways, especially β-catenin and PKM2, using human bone marrow-derived MSCs. MSCs were cultured under specific conditions and PCAT-1 expression was modified through transfection. We thoroughly assessed several critical parameters: MSC proliferation, mitochondrial functionality, ATP production and expression of wound healing and osteogenic differentiation markers. Further, we evaluated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineral deposition, essential for bone healing. Our findings revealed that overexpressing PCAT-1 significantly reduced MSC proliferation, hampered mitochondrial performance and lowered ATP levels, suggesting the clear inhibitory effect of PCAT-1 on these vital wound-healing processes. Additionally, PCAT-1 overexpression notably decreased ALP activity and calcium accumulation in MSCs, crucial for effective bone regeneration. This overexpression also led to the reduction in osteogenic marker expression, indicating suppression of osteogenic differentiation, essential in wound-healing scenarios. Moreover, our study uncovered a direct interaction between PCAT-1 and the PKM2/β-catenin pathway, where PCAT-1 overexpression intensified PKM2 activity while inhibiting β-catenin, thereby adversely affecting osteogenesis. This research thus highlights PCAT-1's significant role in impairing wound healing, offering insights into the molecular mechanisms that may guide future therapeutic strategies for enhancing wound repair and bone regeneration.

Efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation on psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

by Qianqian Dai, Yanfeng Zhang, Qian Liu, Chijin Zhang

Objectives

Our aim was to analyze the results of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on vitamin D supplementation for psoriasis in order to explore its effectiveness and safety.

Patients and methods

As of July 7 2023, we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. The study outcomes included change values in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (at 3 months, 6 months, and end of follow-up)/Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)/Psoriasis disability index (PDI)/C-reactive protein (CRP), and adverse events.

Results

333 patients from 4 studies were evaluated. Pooled analyses showed no significant effect of DLQI/PDI/CRP change value (P > 0.05) or PASI change value (3 months, end of follow-up; P > 0.05). Sensitivity analyses and statistical tests did not support the results of the PASI change values (6 months, P = 0.05). However, the results of subgroup analyses should not be ignored(supplementation with vitamin D2 or Asia would be more effective; P = 0.03). There were no serious adverse effects, and only a few individuals experienced nausea.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of psoriasis remains unremarkable. The search for a new prognostic index that combines clinical and laboratory factors is needed to compensate for the shortcomings of existing measures and provide stronger evidence of validity.