Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains one of the most commonly performed cardiac surgeries worldwide. Despite surgical advancements, a significant proportion of patients experience psychological distress following surgery, with depression being particularly common. Current evidence regarding the effectiveness of preoperative psychological interventions in improving postoperative mental health outcomes remains inconclusive. There is a critical need for predictive models that can identify patients at risk of developing clinically significant depressive symptoms (CSDSs) and related psychological conditions after CABG. This multicentre observational study aims to develop and validate prognostic models for predicting CSDSs and other psychological outcomes, including anxiety, post-traumatic stress symptoms and quality of life, 6 weeks after elective CABG surgery.
The study will recruit 300 adult patients undergoing elective CABG (with or without valve intervention) across two Swiss hospitals. Data collected will include demographic, clinical, psychometric, inflammation-related and interoceptive variables. A training set (n=200) will be used to develop predictive models using machine learning, while a held-out test set (n=100) will be used for model validation. The primary outcome prediction will focus on CSDSs, assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), with analyses conducted both categorically (PHQ-9 total score ≥10) and continuously as complementary approaches. Secondary models will address anxiety, using the General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7, post-traumatic stress, using the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 and health-related quality of life, using the 12-item Short Form Survey. A simplified ‘light solution’ model with fewer predictors will also be developed for broader applicability. This study will address an important gap in perioperative mental healthcare by identifying key predictors of psychological morbidity following CABG, particularly CSDSs. The resulting models may inform future screening and preventive strategies and improve postsurgical outcomes through early identification and intervention in high-risk individuals.
The responsible ethics committee has reviewed and approved this project (Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich, BASEC number: 2023-02040). The study minimises participant burden by integrating brief validated instruments and limiting psychiatric interviews to relevant outcomes, while ensuring ethical safeguards and respect for participant rights (including written consent). Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and stakeholder meetings involving clinicians and mental health professionals. Findings will also be communicated to participating centres and patient communities in accessible formats.
by Ada Aita, Paola Galozzi, Filippo Zemin, Giulia Principi, Nicole Contran, Giulia Musso, Chiara Cosma, Antonio Ragusa, Donato D’Antona, Daniela Basso
ObjectiveSalivary alpha-amylase (sAA) has been recently proposed as biomarker of stress responsiveness within the sympathetic nervous system, preferable to cortisol, since limitations related to cortisol measurement (e.g. diurnal and seasonal rhythms, drugs interferences). Several factors, as age, collection device and analytical methods, also influence sAA levels and interpretation. This study aims to assess whether sAA could be useful to evaluate the stress response, also verifying some sources of variability.
MethodsTo identify any sources of sAA variability, saliva samples were collected from eight healthy subjects at five different times (8:00, 10:00, 12:00, 14:00 and 16:00) over five consecutive days using two different collection devices. Saliva was then collected from 35 obstetric residents before and after a simulated shoulder dystocia scenario, one of the most traumatic birth events in the professional life of gynecologists, to assess the stress levels. Samples were analysed throughout two different assays. Heart rate (HR) of residents was also measured before and after simulation scenario. Residents self-collected two saliva samples 10 min apart on a typical day.
ResultsOverall, sAA levels increased significantly from morning to afternoon. Levels varied between subjects, but no differences were found between days or sampling devices. sAA activity levels in samples from 35 residents were significantly higher than those obtained before the scenario took place (about ten minutes later). These results were confirmed by two different assays. Moreover, a similar trend was observed when HR was considered. No differences were observed between samples collected 10 minutes apart on a typical day.
ConclusionsSalivary alpha-amylase activity is a reliable, quick, and efficient marker for stress response, then its measurement will be of potential interest in the field of stress-related disorders. However, it is important to consider the timing of sample collection before introducing sAA in a clinical setting.