FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Is the Active Involvement of Family Caregivers in Adult Hospital Care Effective to Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Aim

To investigate the effects of active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care on patients' readmissions, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, quality of life, psychological distress and activities of daily living, as well as on the satisfaction of patients, HCPs and family caregivers.

Design

Systematic review.

Data Sources

Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Cochrane Library (from inception to February 2024).

Methods

The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed. Prospective controlled studies focusing on active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care were included. Two independent teams of authors conducted study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.

Results

Thirteen studies were included, comprising 11 randomised controlled trials. The clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Six of these studies were performed in stroke patients. Some studies reported statistically significant benefits of active family involvement on readmission rates, hospital LOS, ADL, psychological distress for patients and family members, QoL and satisfaction of family caregivers. However, others did not observe differences in these outcomes. For complication rates, mortality and satisfaction of patients and HCPs, no studies demonstrated significant differences between groups.

Conclusion

Further research is needed to provide a conclusive answer as to whether active family caregiver involvement improves outcomes of adult hospitalised patients.

Implications for Patient Care

Despite the inconclusive findings of this review, advocating for active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care fits the perspective of patient- and family-centred care.

Impact

As the care of hospitalised adults is shifting to a more family-centric approach, investigating the effects of an active role of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care is necessary. However, the small number of studies available and heterogeneity between studies included in this review hamper firm conclusions. Further evaluations through well-designed studies are required.

Study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled MERCURI-2 trial: promoting effective renoprotection in cardiac surgery patients by inhibition of sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2

Por: Oosterom-Eijmael · M. · Monteiro de Oliveira · N. P. · Niesten · E. D. · Tolsma · M. · Snellen · F. T. · Gerritse · B. M. · Scohy · T. V. · Rettig · T. · Godfried · M. B. · Voogd · M. F. · Wink · J. · van der Werff · L. M. · Eberl · S. · Preckel · B. · Hermanides · J. · van Raalte · D
Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Currently, no effective therapy exists to reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in reducing AKI in outpatient settings for patients with chronic kidney disease. We hypothesised that perioperative SGLT2 inhibition will also reduce AKI incidence after cardiac surgery according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria.

Methods and analysis

We designed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded, superiority trial. A total of 784 patients, aged above 18 years, undergoing cardiac surgery will be included with stratification for sex and type 2 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will receive either dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo from the day before until 2 days after surgery. Serum creatinine will be measured preoperatively and daily for the first 7 days after the operation, and urine output will be measured until the urinary catheter is removed. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative AKI according to the KDIGO criteria.

Ethics and dissemination

The medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC) and the Dutch competent authority approved the study protocol (currently, version 9, 19 January 2024). This is an investigator-initiated study. The Amsterdam UMC, as sponsor, retains ownership of all data and publication rights. After completion of the trial, results will be disseminated to participants, patient societies and physicians via a network meeting and digital newsletter. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed international medical journal and presented on (inter)national congresses.

Trial registration number

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05590143.

❌