Conectar
Different malaria control measures are deployed simultaneously in endemic settings globally, with varying impacts on malaria burden. In sub-Saharan Africa, which bears the greatest burden of malaria, evidence on the impact of implementing various control interventions on malaria immunity remains unknown. This systematic review seeks to collate evidence on the extent of progression from uncomplicated to severe malaria among populations in sub-Saharan Africa settings receiving concurrent deployment of various malaria control measures.
The review will use a priori criteria contained in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. An experienced librarian (AAK) will independently search for articles from the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar. Boolean operators ‘AND’ and ‘OR’ will be used in the article search. Identified articles will be managed using EndNote. Article screening for inclusion and data extraction will be done in duplicate by two reviewers (EJO, and BM). Data extraction tools will be developed and customised in Excel. Data will be analysed using both narrative and quantitative synthesis. The level of heterogeneity between study outcomes will be measured using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity and establish the impact of different control interventions on progression from uncomplicated to severe malaria. A full systematic review and meta-analysis is expected to be ready for dissemination by the end of December 2025.
This study did not involve human participants and so ethical approval was not sought. A full review and a meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences.
CRD 42024619945.
This study examines whether racism exists among Jewish and Arab patients in Israel, as reflected in patient preference for receiving treatment from a nurse with the same ethnic background.
We examine the relationship between racism and the level of trust in a nurse from a different ethnic group than the patient, as well as the preferred level of social distance, in the context of ongoing conflicts between the Jewish majority and the Arab minority in Israel.
A cross-sectional study was conducted using a unique study questionnaire that asked 534 Jewish and 478 Arab respondents to express their preference for an Arab and a Jewish nurse.
Among both the Jews and the Arabs, there is a similar tendency of racism toward nurses of the dissimilar ethnic group. This racism was also prevalent among participants who live in a mixed environment or those who studied or are studying and worked or work in a mixed environment. As the trust in nursing staff members from the other group increases, the level of racism decreases. The greater the social distance the participants felt from the members of the other group, the more racist the attitudes they expressed.
Both Jews and Arabs preferred to be treated by nurses of their own ethnic group. In contrast to the contact hypothesis theory, participants who live in a mixed environment did not express fewer racist preferences. We conclude with some useful practical suggestions aimed at decreasing racism in health care.
Findings imply that prospective patients prefer to receive nursing care from nurses of their own ethnic group and trust these nurses more than they trust nurses of different ethnic group.
FreshRSS 