Chronic pain is a common health condition that significantly impacts the quality of life of those affected, affecting one in five people in Canada. The prevalence of this condition tends to increase with age, making it a major health issue given the ageing population. However, its management remains inadequate and requires significant mobilisation of healthcare professionals as well as the development of multiple therapeutic solutions. Among these, non-pharmacological interventions such as hypnosis and virtual reality have proven effective. Nevertheless, while the existing literature seems promising, it presents methodological limitations. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of an intervention combining virtual reality and hypnosis in an ageing population suffering from a widespread chronic pain condition, that is, hand arthritis.

This study will be a single-centre randomised clinical trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: one receiving an intervention combining virtual reality and hypnosis, and the other receiving only virtual reality. The effectiveness of the intervention on current perceived pain before and after the intervention (primary outcome) will be evaluated. Secondary outcomes will include anxiety and depressive symptoms, quality of life, relaxation and fatigue. Exploratory analyses will also be conducted to contribute to the emerging literature by examining physiological variables such as heart rate variability, respiratory rate and electrodermal activity during the intervention, and their relationship with primary and secondary outcomes.

The project was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of the Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (Project no 2024-3539). Participants will be asked to provide written consent for their participation. Results from this study will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, as well as oral and poster presentations at scientific events. The protocol for this study was preregistered on Open Science Framework and raw anonymised data will be available on this platform (https://osf.io/vbh72/?view_only=1d17c5708f894faab6669d85e1fde75d).

NCT06833905.

Body contouring surgery (BCS) can be applied to reduce the physical and mental burden of excess skin after massive weight loss. Self-reported outcomes of patients are used to assess this burden and to evaluate the effectiveness of BCS. The aim of this study is to clarify what is reflected in self-reports of excess skin after bariatric surgery. We hypothesise that the self-reported burden of excess skin is associated with both objectively assessed excess skin and the disposition to experience negative emotions.

This cross-sectional study will include 68 outpatients presenting at a plastic surgery clinic with a request for BCS. Patients fill out two questionnaires (the BODY-Q and the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ)) to measure the size and burden of excess skin as well as the Big Five Inventory (BFI) to measure the disposition towards negative emotionality. Anonymised photographs of excess skin will be rated independently by four plastic surgeons using the Pittsburgh Rating Scale (PRS) Rainbow Classification to establish the objective amount of excess skin. Multiple linear regression analyses will be performed to identify the association of BODY-Q and SESQ scores with objective appraisals of excess skin by plastic surgeons, negative emotionality and demographics. Interobserver agreement for PRS Rainbow Classification will be established by Fleiss’ kappa.

Ethical approval was obtained from the regional medical ethics committee (METC; W20.258) and the institutional review board (Lokale Toetsing, St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein, no. Z23.035). Informed consent of participants will be obtained. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.