FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Association between individual social capital and depressed mood in older adults in Iran: results from baseline data of Birjand Longitudinal Aging Study

Por: Tajik · A. · Varmaghani · M. · Shirazinia · M. · Sharifi · F. · Honari · S. · Moodi · M. · Barekati · H. · Khorashadizadeh · M. · Naderimagham · S.
Objectives

To examine the association between individual social capital and depression in older adults in Iran and to test the hypothesis that higher levels of social capital are inversely associated with depressive symptoms.

Design

Cross-sectional study using baseline data from a longitudinal cohort.

Setting

Community-based study conducted in primary care settings across urban and rural areas of Birjand County, Eastern Iran.

Participants

A total of 1348 community-dwelling individuals aged 60 years and older were recruited through multistage stratified cluster random sampling. Participants who were bedridden or had end-stage disease (life expectancy

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was depression status, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items, with a score≥10 indicating depression. The main explanatory variable was social capital, assessed using a validated 69-item questionnaire capturing domains such as collective activity, social trust and network structure. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for associations between depression and social capital dimensions. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.12.0

Results

Of the total participants, 268 (19.94%) were identified as having depressive symptoms, with a significantly higher prevalence among women (27.44%) compared with men (11.88%). Depression was more prevalent among those in the lowest wealth quintile (32.09%) and individuals with low literacy levels (28.10%). Participation in collective activities was inversely associated with depression in the second (OR=0.62, 95% CI (0.42 to 0.93)), third (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.29 to 0.71)), fourth (OR=0.59, 95% CI (0.37 to 0.93)) and fifth (OR=0.37, 95% CI (0.22 to 0.61)) quintiles. Social trust was also associated with lower odds of depression in the third (OR=0.62, 95% CI (0.39 to 0.99)) and fourth (OR=0.64, 95% CI (0.42 to 0.97)) quintiles. Furthermore, the second (OR=0.63, 95% CI (0.40 to 0.99)) and fifth (OR=0.38, 95% CI (0.23 to 0.63)) quintiles of social network structure were inversely related to depression. These findings suggest that higher levels of social capital, particularly in terms of collective participation, trust and social networks, are associated with a reduced likelihood of depressive symptoms in older adults.

Conclusions

Higher levels of social capital, particularly collective engagement, interpersonal trust and diverse social networks, are associated with lower odds of depression in older adults. These findings support the need for community-based interventions to strengthen social capital as a strategy for mental health promotion among the elderly in low-income and middle-income settings.

Platinum and etoposide chemotherapy, durvalumab with thoracic radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: CHEST-RT (TROG 20.01) Trial - protocol for a phase II study

Por: Parakh · S. · Gee · H. · Lim · A. · Vinod · S. · Wheeler · C. · Rooney · B. · Montgomery · R. · Harden · S. · Moore · M. · Lehman · M. · Bettington · C. · Moodie · T. · Barber · J. · Schmidt · L. · Dizon · J. · Leigh · L. · Oldmeadow · C. · Mitchell · P. · Hau · E.
Background

Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 20.01 CHEST-RT (Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Extensive Stage Small cell with Thoracic Radiotherapy) is a single-arm, open-label, prospective, multicentre phase II trial study that aims to establish the safety, feasibility and describe the efficacy of incorporating thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) (concurrent or sequential) to chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

A single arm of up to 30 evaluable participants given TRT concurrent or sequentially with chemoimmunotherapy will be enrolled. Participants should commence radiotherapy with cycle 3 or cycle 4 of chemotherapy. Those not suitable for concurrent radiotherapy due to large tumour volumes may receive sequential radiotherapy. Accounting for a 15% non-evaluable rate, up to 35 participants will be enrolled. An independent data and safety monitoring committee will review the data and assess safety and feasibility. Progression to a phase III trial would be considered feasible if ≤20% of participants experienced ≥grade 3 oesophageal toxicity and ≤10% experienced ≥grade 3 pneumonitis. This approach would be considered feasible if there is ≤20% treatment discontinuation of systemic therapy secondary to radiation toxicities and ≥75% of participants have tumour volumes that can be safely treated to a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary outcome of the trial is safety and feasibility, and survival and responses will be assessed as secondary endpoints. A predefined subgroup analysis of toxicity will be performed on group 1 (concurrent TRT) versus group 2 participants (consolidation TRT).

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Peter MacCallum Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/73189/PMCC-2021). The protocol, technical and clinical data will be disseminated by conference presentations and publications. Any modifications to the protocol will be formally documented by administrative letters and will be submitted to the approving HREC for review and approval.

Trial registration numbers

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000586819) and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT05796089).

Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow replacement: a protocol for analysis of National Joint Registry data in England

Por: Hamoodi · Z. · Sayers · A. · Whitehouse · M. R. · Kearsley-Fleet · L. · Sergeant · J. C. · Watts · A. C.
Introduction

Understanding the prognostic factors associated with the failure of total elbow replacement (TER) is crucial for informing patients about risks and enabling shared decision-making regarding TER as a definitive management option. This protocol outlines the planned analysis of National Joint Registry (NJR) data to investigate prognostic factors for TER failure.

Methods and analysis

The primary analysis will use the NJR elbow dataset, including all eligible patients who underwent TER surgery between April 2012 and December 2023. To incorporate ethnicity and comorbidities as potential prognostic factors, the NJR will be linked to the National Health Service (NHS) England Hospital Episode Statistics-Admitted Patient Care (HES-APC) data for a secondary analysis. The analysis will adhere to the REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies guidelines. The primary outcome under investigation is TER failure, defined as requiring revision surgery. Initially, the overall prognosis of TER will be examined using unadjusted net implant failure via the Kaplan-Meier method. The list of potential prognostic factors to be investigated in this study has been informed by a systematic review on this topic, input from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) groups and a survey shared with healthcare professionals providing TER services. The relationship between each potential prognostic factor and failure will be assessed using univariable regression methods. Based on the findings from our systematic review, the univariable association will also be adjusted for age, sex and indication for TER surgery using multivariable regression methods. The extent of missing data will be reported, and the reasons for missing data will be explored. A very high degree of data completeness is expected, and a complete case analysis will be performed as the primary analysis. Multiple imputations will be considered as a sensitivity analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

The NJR research committee approved this analysis, and the NHS Health Research Authority tool guidance dictates that the secondary use of such data for research does not require approval from a research ethics committee. The results from this analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

NCT06760585.

❌