Conectar
To synthesise evidence on decision regret about treatment amongst women with early breast cancer, including (1) the type of treatment related to decision regret, (2) the level of decision regret, and (3) factors associated with decision regret.
Integrative review.
Studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 were searched from five online databases to provide up-to-date evidence. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The constant comparison strategy was employed for data analysis.
A total of 26 studies were included. Breast cancer surgery was the most frequently studied treatment in relation to decision regret amongst women with early breast cancer, while adjuvant therapies were less studied. Most studies reported low levels of decision regret, while several studies found high levels. The proportion of women reporting decision regret varied considerably from 2.5% to 69% across the included studies. Factors associated with decision regret included various socio-demographic and clinical characteristics (age, ethnicity, employment, education, health literacy, cancer stage, and treatment types), decision-making experiences (patient involvement, patient preference, accessing information, and the use of decision support tools), and mental health.
Decision regret occurs in women with early breast cancer after surgery and adjuvant therapies. A variety of factors should be considered during the treatment decision-making process to minimise decision regret. More robust studies are needed to disaggregate decision regret by treatment type and to evaluate the effectiveness of decision support tools in reducing decision regret in women with early breast cancer.
Nurses and other healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for decision regret related to surgery and adjuvant therapies in women with early breast cancer. The findings can help nurses and other healthcare professionals identify women at higher risk of experiencing decision regret and provide support during the treatment decision-making process to mitigate it.
PRISMA 2020 Statement.
No patient or public contribution to this review.
The clinical significance of cancer-related stigma on patients' well-being has been widely established. Stigma can be perceived and internalised by cancer patients or implemented by the general population and healthcare workers. Various interventions have been carried out to reduce cancer-related stigma, but their effectiveness is not well-understood. This review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma.
An integrative review.
This integrative review combined both qualitative and quantitative studies and followed five steps to identify problems, search for the literature, appraise the literature quality, analyse data, and present data. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2018) was applied to evaluate the quality of the included studies.
Databases included Web of Science, MEDLINE, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Journals, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, OVID, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (from the inception of each database to 30 April 2021).
Eighteen quantitative, six qualitative, and five mixed-methods studies were included in this review. Cultural factors should be considered when conducting interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma. For cancer patients, multi-component interventions have demonstrated a positive effect on their perceived stigma. For general population, interactive interventions show promise to reduce their implemented stigma towards cancer patients. For healthcare workers, there is a paucity of studies to reduce their implemented stigma. Existing studies reported inconclusive evidence, partially due to the lack of a robust study design with an adequate sample size.
Multi-component and interactive interventions show promise to relieve cancer-related stigma. More methodologically robust studies should be conducted in different cultures to elucidate the most appropriate interventions for different populations to reduce cancer-related stigma.
These findings will facilitate healthcare workers to design and implement interventions to reduce cancer-related stigma, thus improving the quality of life for cancer patients.
No patient and public contribution.
FreshRSS 