Conectar
by Min Wang, Yushun Yan, Wanqiu Yang, Ruini He, Lingdan Zhao, Yikai Dou, Yuanmei Tao, Xiao Yang, Qingqing Xiang, Xiaohong Ma
Psychiatric nurses represent a high-stress occupational group that experiences elevated levels of suicidal ideation (SI), emphasizing the need for focused mental health interventions. The main purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of SI among psychiatric nurses and to identify the psychological and occupational factors associated with SI. A total of 1,835 psychiatric nurses completed questionnaires on depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), SI, quality of work-related life (QWL), and burnout. Multivariate logistic regression and phenotypic network analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with SI and the potential pathways linking depressive symptoms, burnout, and QWL to SI. The results indicated that 11.33% of the participants had SI in the past two weeks. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, stress at work, general well-being, and the home-work interface were significant predictors of SI. Network analysis further revealed that psychomotor changes, guilt, sad mood, low energy, and appetite changes were the symptoms most directly associated with SI. In addition, sad mood, general well-being, and work-home interface were linked to job and career satisfaction, whereas sad mood and low energy were associated with emotional exhaustion and SI. These findings contribute valuable large-scale evidence on the mental health challenges faced by psychiatric nurses and highlight the importance of addressing mood disturbances, energy loss, and work-related stress in SI prevention efforts for this vulnerable group.This study aimed to develop a structural model to elucidate the contributions of social support, health literacy and psychological resilience to self-management behaviours in liver transplant recipients after surgery.
Cross-sectional study.
This study included 215 Chinese patients who returned to the outpatient department after liver transplantation between June 2023 and March 2024. Data were collected via a general demographic questionnaire, a self-management questionnaire for liver transplant recipients, a chronic disease resource questionnaire, the Connor–Davidson resilience scale and the health literacy scale for chronic patients. Correlation analysis and structural equation modelling were utilised to analyse the relationships among social support, health literacy, psychological resilience and self-management ability.
The final model showed good fit (χ 2/df = 1.690, GFI = 0.919, IFI = 0.951, TLI = 0.938, CFI = 0.950 and RMSEA = 0.057). The direct effect coefficient of social support on self-management ability is 0.293. The indirect effect value of health literacy on the relationship between social support and self-management ability was 0.312, whereas the indirect effect value of psychological resilience in this context was 0.096. Furthermore, the chain-mediating effect involving both health literacy and psychological resilience between social support and self-management ability was 0.109.
The revised model, grounded in social cognitive theory, demonstrated a strong fit for predicting self-management behaviours among liver transplant recipients. Furthermore, social support, health literacy and psychological resilience exerted both direct and indirect influences on the self-management behaviours of these recipients.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE).
In public or patient involvement in this study.
Our study aims to assess the effectiveness of horticultural therapy in improving outcomes in older patients with dementia.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The included studies comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to assess the effectiveness of horticultural therapy on cognitive function in older patients with dementia. The study design and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators, who also evaluated the risk of bias using RoB 2.0. The meta-analysis was carried out using Stata 15.1 software.
On November 2023, we searched relevant English and Chinese publications in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases.
The meta-analysis included a total of 9 RCTs, involving 655 older patients diagnosed with dementia. The findings from these studies demonstrated that horticultural therapy had a significant positive impact on various aspects of the patients' well-being when compared to conventional care. Specifically, it was found to improve cognitive function scores, alleviate symptoms of depression, enhance daily activities and enhance overall quality of life. When conducting a subgroup analysis, it was observed that horticultural therapy had a statistically significant effect on cognitive function in older patients with dementia when the intervention frequency was at least two times per week. Furthermore, interventions with a duration of less than 6 months were found to be more effective than those lasting 6 months or longer. Additionally, outdoor horticultural therapy was found to be superior to indoor interventions. Moreover, structured interventions were observed to yield better outcomes compared to non-structured interventions.
More high-quality studies are needed to further corroborate these findings due to the low quality of the included studies. Horticultural therapy has been found to have a significantly positive impact on the cognitive function, depression status, ADL, and quality of life of older patients with dementia.
We provide references for non-pharmacologic treatment of older patients with dementia.
This study aimed to measure the efficacy of horticultural therapy in older patients with dementia across four dimensions: cognitive function, depression levels, daily living activities and overall quality of life.
In older patients with dementia, horticultural therapy has been proven to have a significant positive impact on cognitive function, depressive status, activities of daily living and quality of life.
This study will inform non-pharmacological interventions for older patients with dementia worldwide.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
(1) To describe existing tools to assess the burden of informal caregivers of people with cancer, (2) to describe how these tools have been validated and (3) to describe the areas of interest of existing assessment tool entries.
The caregiver burden of informal caregivers of people with cancer greatly affects their lives. There is a wide variety of relevant assessment tools available, but there are no studies to help researchers to select tools.
A search was conducted using the keywords ‘cancer’, ‘caregiver’, ‘burden’ and ‘scale’ in Medline (PubMed), CINAHL and EMBASE to include articles that developed or applied tools to assess the burden on informal caregivers of cancer patients. Once eligible tools were identified, we searched their ‘primary reference’ studies. If the original scale was assessed in a population other than informal caregivers of cancer patients, we again searched for psychometric measures in the population of caregivers of cancer patients.
This study retrieved 938 articles on developing or applying the informal caregiver burden instrument for cancer patients, including 42 scales. Internal consistency of the original scales ranged from 0.53 to 0.96. Nineteen scales initially developed to assess caregiver burden for patients with dementia, stroke and other disorders were later used for caregivers of cancer patients, eight of which have not yet been validated. Reclassifying all scale domains of concern revealed that scale assessments focused more on caregivers' physical health, emotional state and caregiving tasks.
This review identifies many scales for assessing informal caregiver burden in cancer patients and gives scales recommended. However, a portion still needs to be validated. The development of a new scale proposes to be based on a theoretical framework and to consider dimensions for assessing support resources.
What problem did the study address?: This paper collates assessment tools on the burden of informal carers of people with cancer. It also provides information on the applicable population, reliability and validity.
What were the main findings?: 41 scales could be considered for use, eight of which have not been validated. The scales focus more on assessing caregivers' physical health, emotional state and caregiving tasks, and less on the dimension of support resources.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: There are implications for informal carers of cancer patients in hospitals or in the community, as well as for relevant researchers.
Retrieved with reference to systematic evaluation.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 