Conectar
by Helen W. Li, Jesse Kiprono Too, Sarah Nyanchama Nyariki, Charles Nathan Nessle, Sara Malone, Rachel Matsumoto, Teddy Ashibende Aurah, Jeffrey A. Blatnik, JoAnna Hunter-Squires, Ivan Seno Saruni
BackgroundCapacity for elective general surgical care is an important reflection of a health system’s ability to meet a population’s surgical needs and is currently known to be inadequate in many low- and middle-income countries. Patient agency is a key, understudied factor which shapes how and when patients ultimately decide to engage with formal care. Understanding factors which influence patient care seeking activity can have important implications for how current and future health systems may be utilized. This study aims to explore how patients approach the navigation and triage of their elective hernia condition within the Kenyan surgical care system.
MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study of 38 convenience-sampled patients diagnosed with an elective hernia condition at a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya between November 2023 and March 2024. We utilized Braun and Clarke’s six-step model of thematic analysis to generate key themes across the phases of care seeking, reaching and receiving as modeled in the Three Delays Framework.
ResultsWe identified three main cross-cutting themes including (1) the flow of power from patients to providers, and vice versa, take the form of consent or knowledge, respectively; (2) trust is a limited currency required for patients to engage with formal care; and (3) internal and external contextual factors remain the foundation for patient-provider care activities. We incorporated these themes together in a framework which illustrates the cyclical nature by which each factor feeds back on the others, ultimately affecting patient care.
ConclusionsFluctuating flows of patient power and trust interacts with existing infrastructural context to influence the ability of a health system to generate care. Recognizing the interaction of these key factors may have important bearing on the successful implementation of any larger systemic efforts or policies to improve access to elective surgical care.
To clarify how public health nurses allocate their time across various tasks and compare time-use patterns between prefectural and municipal public health nurses in Japan, where distinct administrative mandates define their roles.
A self-reported, prospective time study.
Public health nurses from two municipalities and one prefecture recorded their daily practices and time allocations using Kintone. Time allocation differences by administrative level and job position were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.
Overall, 121 participants contributed 9502 person-days of data. Participants spent an average of 463.6 min/workday on work-related activities. Municipal public health nurses dedicated more time to application paperwork (64.0 min), health examinations (57.6 min), and individual coordination (48.3 min). Prefectural public health nurses allocated more time to business management and organisational operations (69.0 min) and traveliing, particularly in rural contexts. Managers spent less time on direct care and more on administrative tasks.
This study provides the first quantitative, self-reported evidence of task distribution among public health nurses across administrative levels and positions. The findings reflect structural differences in role expectations and underscore the need to reallocate workloads to better align with each level's mandate.
Task prioritisation, information and communication technology tool integration, and administrative support are essential in optimising public health nurses' contributions to community health. These strategies can reduce non-clinical workload and enable public health nurses to focus on high-impact, value-added public health services that promote health equity.
This study closes a longstanding gap by quantifying PHNs' time allocation, revealing the hidden burden of administrative work, and providing critical insights for workforce planning and sustainable public health service delivery.
This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline.
No Patient or Public Involvement.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000051509 (https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000058761; August 1, 2023)
To assess the reliability and validity of a negative emotion scale for public health nurses conducting child abuse prevention activities.
A four-phase mixed method design.
Participants were public health nurses with experience in child abuse prevention across Japan. The initial scale was developed and refined based on previous studies, expert panel reviews, interviews with public health nurses, and a questionnaire-based pilot study. In 2024, 549 public health nurses completed a questionnaire on scale items. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, comparisons with a preexisting scale, the number of times negative attitudes and the types of behaviours exhibited by parents were used to narrow the scale and assess its psychometric properties.
Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis reduced the scale to 15 items on two factors: ‘negative emotions toward aggressive and emotional attitudes’ and ‘negative emotions toward rejecting and uncooperative attitudes.’ Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit. The Cronbach's alpha was high, and the negative emotions scale score positively correlated with the pre-existing scale, negative attitudes and parental behaviours.
The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and other factors confirmed the scale's reliability, and correlations with other scales confirmed its validity.
Evaluating negative emotions provides critical insights into the quality of support and its influence on psychological well-being.
By assessing negative emotions that public health nurses find difficult using this scale, the support system for them can be examined.
STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed.
Public health nurses were involved in the generation of items for the scale. Their perspective was sought in determining the items for the scale.
Registered in the UMIIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000054650).
Neonatal haemochromatosis, considered to be a gestational alloimmune liver disease (NH-GALD), is a rare but serious disease that results in fulminant hepatic failure. The recurrence rate of NH-GALD in a subsequent infant of a mother with an affected infant is 70%–90%. Recently, antenatal maternal high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy has been reported as being effective for preventing recurrence of NH-GALD in a subsequent infant. However, no clinical trial has been conducted to date.
This is a multicentre open-label, single-arm study of antenatal maternal high-dose IVIG therapy in pregnant women with a history of documented NH in a previous offspring. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antenatal maternal high-dose IVIG therapy in preventing or reducing the severity of alloimmune injury to the fetal liver.
The clinical trial is being performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board at four hospitals. Before enrolment, written informed consent would be obtained from eligible pregnant women. The results are expected to be published in a scientific journal.
28 October 2024, V.8.0.
jRCT1091220353.
FreshRSS 