Conectar
To clarify how public health nurses allocate their time across various tasks and compare time-use patterns between prefectural and municipal public health nurses in Japan, where distinct administrative mandates define their roles.
A self-reported, prospective time study.
Public health nurses from two municipalities and one prefecture recorded their daily practices and time allocations using Kintone. Time allocation differences by administrative level and job position were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.
Overall, 121 participants contributed 9502 person-days of data. Participants spent an average of 463.6 min/workday on work-related activities. Municipal public health nurses dedicated more time to application paperwork (64.0 min), health examinations (57.6 min), and individual coordination (48.3 min). Prefectural public health nurses allocated more time to business management and organisational operations (69.0 min) and traveliing, particularly in rural contexts. Managers spent less time on direct care and more on administrative tasks.
This study provides the first quantitative, self-reported evidence of task distribution among public health nurses across administrative levels and positions. The findings reflect structural differences in role expectations and underscore the need to reallocate workloads to better align with each level's mandate.
Task prioritisation, information and communication technology tool integration, and administrative support are essential in optimising public health nurses' contributions to community health. These strategies can reduce non-clinical workload and enable public health nurses to focus on high-impact, value-added public health services that promote health equity.
This study closes a longstanding gap by quantifying PHNs' time allocation, revealing the hidden burden of administrative work, and providing critical insights for workforce planning and sustainable public health service delivery.
This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline.
No Patient or Public Involvement.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000051509 (https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000058761; August 1, 2023)
To assess the reliability and validity of a negative emotion scale for public health nurses conducting child abuse prevention activities.
A four-phase mixed method design.
Participants were public health nurses with experience in child abuse prevention across Japan. The initial scale was developed and refined based on previous studies, expert panel reviews, interviews with public health nurses, and a questionnaire-based pilot study. In 2024, 549 public health nurses completed a questionnaire on scale items. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, comparisons with a preexisting scale, the number of times negative attitudes and the types of behaviours exhibited by parents were used to narrow the scale and assess its psychometric properties.
Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis reduced the scale to 15 items on two factors: ‘negative emotions toward aggressive and emotional attitudes’ and ‘negative emotions toward rejecting and uncooperative attitudes.’ Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit. The Cronbach's alpha was high, and the negative emotions scale score positively correlated with the pre-existing scale, negative attitudes and parental behaviours.
The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and other factors confirmed the scale's reliability, and correlations with other scales confirmed its validity.
Evaluating negative emotions provides critical insights into the quality of support and its influence on psychological well-being.
By assessing negative emotions that public health nurses find difficult using this scale, the support system for them can be examined.
STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed.
Public health nurses were involved in the generation of items for the scale. Their perspective was sought in determining the items for the scale.
Registered in the UMIIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000054650).
Hypertension is a major health challenge imposing substantial economic and health burdens worldwide. This study compared treatment outcomes and costs between cost-intensive and non-cost-intensive pharmacotherapies, defined by prescribing intervals and the type of drugs, using electronic health record (EHR) data from multiple healthcare facilities, focusing on the type of antihypertensive drug and prescribing patterns.
A retrospective cohort study. A mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between cardiovascular events and healthcare resource use.
EHRs from 34 primary care facilities in Japan.
Patients prescribed either angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) alone or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) alone were included.
During 6629 person-years of follow-up, 71 events were observed. Model diagnostics confirmed the proportional hazards assumption and substantial inter-clinic heterogeneity. The type of drug (ARBs or CCBs) had no statistically significant impact on the incidence of cardiovascular events (HR 0.999, 95% CI 0.603 to 1.655). Similarly, shorter prescribing intervals (less than 36 days) were not significantly associated with the outcome (HR 1.724, 95% CI 0.906 to 3.279). The mean annual medical cost per patient for the cost-intensive (ARB with short prescribing intervals) and non-cost-intensive (CCB with long prescribing intervals) groups was Japanese yen (JPY) 137 023 and JPY 85 911, respectively. Sensitivity analysis using different time windows yielded similar results, confirming the robustness of the findings.
No apparent reduction in cardiovascular events associated with the use of ARBs or shorter prescribing intervals was observed despite the elevated cost caused by intensive pharmacotherapy and frequent clinic visits.
FreshRSS 