by Ziyue Wang, Bowen Lu, Hao Yang, Weijie Zhao, Xinru Kong, Chuanhao Mi, Jianlin Wu
ObjectiveEdaravone is a neuroprotective agent, but the characteristics of its adverse events (AEs) remain insufficiently explored. This study aims to examine AEs associated with edaravone use by analyzing real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
MethodsThis retrospective study extracted adverse event reports related to edaravone from the FAERS database, spanning from the second quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis methods, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), were employed to detect AE signals associated with edaravone use.
ResultsAmong 2,931 adverse event reports (AERs) in which edaravone was identified as the primary suspected drug, 86 preferred terms (PTs) and 20 system organ classes (SOCs) were included. At the PTs level, the significant drug-related adverse events were death (n = 589, ROR = 8.64), disease progression (n = 266, ROR = 28.26) and drug ineffectiveness (n = 252, ROR = 2.16). Additionally, rare but notably strong adverse event signals were observed, including thrombosis at the catheter site thrombosi, gastric fistula, and vein collapse.
ConclusionOur research found that edaravone has some overlooked adverse reactions. Further epidemiological studies are needed to more comprehensively explore and assess the risk-benefit profile of edaravone.
To identify and synthesise the levels of death anxiety and potential moderating factors in patients with advanced cancer.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
A comprehensive search was conducted across 10 electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Chinese Biomedical, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANFANG, covering publications in both English and Chinese from inception through June 18, 2025.
Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted using STATA 16 software. Predefined subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to examine variations in death anxiety among advanced cancer patients based on participant characteristics, disease-related factors, and study-level variables.
Twenty-one studies involving 4337 patients with advanced cancer met the inclusion criteria. These studies, published between 1978 and 2025, were conducted across five countries. Meta-analyses were performed separately for 16 studies using the original 15-item dichotomous Templer Death Anxiety Scale and 3 studies using an adapted five-point Likert version. Both analyses indicated high levels of death anxiety among patients. Differences in participant age, country, continent, and publication year contributed to the variation in findings.
Advanced cancer patients experience high levels of death anxiety, with age, country, continent, and publication year identified as key moderating factors. Targeting these factors through tailored interventions, promoting a supportive culture around death, and providing effective psychological training for patients can help reduce anxiety. These efforts aim to equip patients to understand and cope with the realities of death, ultimately improving their psychological well-being.
This review highlights the high levels of death anxiety in advanced cancer patients and identifies potential moderators. It underscores the need for targeted interventions to improve psychological care, particularly in end-of-life settings.
No patient or public contribution.
The review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251033114).
To conceptualise information distortion in Electronic Health Records (EHRs), with the goal of providing a theoretical foundation for improving documentation practices.
A concept analysis.
Walker and Avant's strategy for concept analysis was used. The defining attributes, antecedents and consequences were identified.
A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus from their inception to December 2024. Studies published in English that addressed information distortion in EHRs were included.
A total of 37 studies were included. The three defining attributes were: real-world health truth, representation of reality and mismatch relationship. Antecedents were divided into five categories: people-related factors, equipment factors, regulatory factors, working environment factors and management factors. The consequences of information distortion in EHRs included threats to patient safety, poor operational performance, eroded trust, compromised research quality and health inequity.
This concept analysis enhances the understanding of information distortion in EHRs and provides a foundation for further empirical validation. The findings may contribute to the development of measurement instruments and strategies to mitigate information distortion in healthcare settings.
By undertaking a concept analysis of information distortion in EHRs, healthcare professionals will be better equipped to recognise and assess this ethical phenomenon, thereby supporting the development of targeted interventions to mitigate potential harms to healthcare practices. In addition, the clarity of this concept could provide a new angle from which to analyse the origins of flawed EHR documentation and its ripple effects across healthcare systems.
No patient or public involvement.