Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remain the WHO-recommended treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. However, the emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance (ART-R) threatens ACT efficacy. ART-R is phenotypically expressed as delayed parasite clearance, which can facilitate ACT partner drug resistance. ART-R has been causally linked to specific mutations in the Pfkelch13 gene.

The systematic review and associated meta-analysis aim to determine the correlation between Pfkelch13 (alleles present in the Kelch13 gene region of the P. falciparum parasite) genotypes and clinical and parasitological response to ACTs from a globally representative data set pooling individual patient data (IPD) from eligible published and unpublished studies. The eligibility criteria include Pfkelch13 genotyping results at baseline complemented by individually linked parasitological and clinical assessments following artemisinin-based treatment. The data will be curated, standardised and analysed using this proposed statistical analysis plan (SAP), adhering to PRISMA-IPD (PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Our SAP will apply hierarchical modelling to assess the effect of the P. falciparum parasite Pfkelch13 mutations on parasite clearance half-life and therapeutic efficacy across different regions. This will include study sites as random effects in the model and potential predictors such as age, sex, baseline parasite load and other potential effect modifiers as fixed effects. This analysis will enhance the understanding of the influence of Pfkelch13 mutations on malaria treatment outcomes.

Data were obtained with informed consent and ethical approvals from the relevant countries and were pseudonymised before curation in the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO)/WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) repository. Data ownership remains with contributors. This IPD meta-analysis met the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee criteria for waiving ethical review, as it is a secondary analysis of existing pseudonymised data. The resulting peer-reviewed publication and conference proceedings will help strengthen and enhance the efficiency of ART-R surveillance and response and support policy decisions.

CRD42019133366.

The current diagnostic pathway for patients with a suspected inherited bleeding disorder is long, costly, resource intensive, emotionally draining for patients and often futile, as half of patients will remain without a diagnosis and be labelled ‘bleeding disorder of unknown cause’. Advances in understanding the genetic basis of the inherited bleeding disorders, coupled with both increasing infrastructure for genetic/genomic testing and decreasing costs, have increased the feasibility of introducing genomic testing into the clinical diagnostic pathway as a potential solution to improve the care of these patients. Yet, there remain evidence gaps on the optimal integration of genomic analysis into the diagnostic pathway.

Using a multicentre randomised-controlled trial design, we will evaluate an early genomic testing strategy for the diagnosis of newly referred patients with a suspected inherited bleeding disorder. Eligible participants will be randomised to early genomic testing diagnostic pathway (intervention) or standard diagnostic pathway (control) and will be followed for a 12-month period. Patients in the control group who remain undiagnosed at study end will be offered identical early genomic testing to ensure equitable access to the intervention. The study will follow a parallel fixed design with waitlist control group and a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study will be conducted at three tertiary care centres in Ontario, Canada, with a target sample size of 212 participants. Clinical utility will be evaluated via the primary outcome of diagnostic yield, as well as the secondary outcome of time to diagnosis. Additional secondary outcomes will allow for assessment of patient impact via health-related quality of life and patient burden measures, as well as evaluation of economic impact through a cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis.

This investigator-initiated study was approved by the Queen’s University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board through Clinical Trials Ontario (CTO-4909). Participant informed consent/assent is required. Findings will be disseminated through academic publications.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06736158.