FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Assessment of vestibulo-ocular reflex function in people with Parkinsons disease: a cross-sectional study in a rehabilitation setting using the video head impulse test

Por: Ferri · N. · Casagrande Conti · L. · Manzari · L. · Piatti · D. · De Angelis · D. · Nocentini · U. · Tramontano · M.
Background

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative, progressive disorder known for motor and non-motor symptoms. The vestibular system, via the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), is crucial for maintaining dynamic gaze stability, and its role in PD is raising interest among researchers. Indeed, vestibular dysfunction in PD may exacerbate postural instability and gait disturbances; however, the prevalence of vestibular dysfunctions remains unclear. This study aims to objectively investigate the VOR function in people with PD using the video head impulse test.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted in a neurorehabilitation hospital. People with PD were included if they had no cognitive impairment and the ability to walk without physical assistance. The video head impulse test was used to assess the VOR function across all six semicircular canals, using both the Head Impulse Paradigm (HIMP) and the Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) paradigms.

Results

35 people with PD (mean age: 69.9±8.4; 11 females) with moderate motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS-part III: 27.7±6.8) were included. Using normative cut-offs, 69% of the participants had at least one dysfunctional canal (60% hypo-gain, 9% hyper-gain). The prevalence reached 83% when both the HIMP and SHIMP paradigms were considered.

Conclusion

There is a high prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in people with PD. The instrumental assessment of VOR gains could reveal undiagnosed vestibular dysfunctions and, in the future, lead to more specific rehabilitation management of people with PD.

Exploring alterations in sleep-related physiological and psychological outcomes across the menstrual cycle in young, healthy women without sleep disorders: a US-based pilot study protocol

Por: Conti · F. · Hakonsson · Z. · Durmer · J. S. · Galpin · A. J.
Introduction

Research suggests that hormonal fluctuations may contribute to sleep-related physiological and psychological outcomes that differentially affect women’s overall health and well-being. Yet, systematic enquiries on this potential interaction across the menstrual cycle are scant.

Methods and analysis

This protocol paper describes a pilot observational study investigating changes in objective and subjective sleep measures, metabolic biomarkers (body temperature, blood glucose and hormonal concentrations) and psychological outcomes (depressive symptoms, menstrual cycle-related pain and psychological distress), in a cohort of healthy premenopausal women aged 18–35, regularly menstruating, and without sleep disorders. Participants’ sleep is monitored every night over the course of two full menstrual cycles using a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved diagnostic ring from SleepImage and via next morning self-reports (ie, sleep diaries). To minimise the likelihood of undiagnosed sleep disorders, participants also complete two nights of at-home polysomnography. Daily hormonal concentrations are assessed via morning urinalysis using the Mira Fertility Monitor while transitions between hormonal phases are further confirmed by biochemical assays. Body temperature, blood glucose concentrations, diet and physical activity behaviours are continuously recorded using wearable devices and smartphone apps from Oura and Levels. The primary outcomes of this study are total sleep time and sleep quality. Secondary outcomes include sleep onset latency, wakefulness after sleep onset, sleep staging, daytime sleepiness, respiratory rate, resting heart rate, heart rate variability and subjective mood. This study will provide novel data to disentangle the intricate relationship between sleep behaviours, mental well-being and menstrual health in premenopausal women.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Parker University (protocol number PUIRB-2025-3). Study findings will be presented in peer-reviewed publications and at academic conferences.

Determinants and Motivations of Vaccination Hesitancy and Uptake in Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT

Aim

Vaccinations are essential to ensure protection for healthcare professionals, patients and communities. However, vaccination hesitancy has been reported among healthcare professionals. Nurses are the main, first and direct point of contact for patients and citizens in most healthcare services, but only a minority of studies investigated vaccination hesitancy and uptake specifically in this population. Thus, this study aimed to explore the determinants and motivations of vaccination hesitancy and uptake among nurses.

Design

Systematic review with a narrative synthesis approach.

Methods

We included primary research exploring determinants or motivations of vaccination hesitancy or uptake among nurses. No time or geographical limit was applied. Generalised random-effects linear models with a logit link were used to calculate the pooled estimated proportions for vaccine uptake among nurses.

Data Sources

We explored nine databases (2023).

Results

The initial search identified 3452 records; 42 records were eventually included in this review. Older age, longer professional experience, lack of confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and cost associated with the vaccine were among the most common determinants of vaccine hesitancy. Safety concerns, complacency (e.g., beliefs of not needing the vaccine), and accessibility (e.g., logistics) were among the most common motivations for being vaccine hesitant. Having strong confidence in the vaccine, a high sense of collective responsibility, previous vaccination uptake/positive intentions towards future vaccination, weaker vaccine complacency, and older age were among the most common determinants of vaccine uptake. Willingness to protect themselves and/or others, contribute to the herd immunity, and comply with recommendations were among the most common motivations for vaccine uptake. The pooled prevalence of influenza vaccine uptake among nurses was 44% (95% CI: 35–73).

Conclusion

The findings of this systematic review with meta-analysis could guide the identification of strategies to reduce barriers and further improve facilitators to eventually increase vaccine uptake in nurses.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

This study contributes to further understanding nurses' beliefs, barriers, and facilitators towards vaccination. By doing so, these results could guide the identification of strategies to reduce barriers and further improve facilitators to eventually increase vaccine uptake in nurses.

Reporting Method

We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, in particular to the PRISMA checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO number: CRD42020212252

❌