FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Prepectoral no mesh versus mesh immediate implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy (Restore-B): a multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled feasibility study protocol

Por: Rolph · R. · Ziebland · S. · Cook · J. A. · Iglesias · C. · Wakefield-Scurr · J. · Malyon · C. · Scaife · J. · Taylor · A. · Hennessy · A. · Markham · S. · Bernstein · M. · Douek · M. · Restore-B Feasibility Collaborative Group · Roy · Rusby · Bonomi · St-John · Agrawal · Smith · Beta
Introduction

Breast cancer is common and women requiring mastectomy will be offered a breast reconstruction if they are surgically suitable candidate. Breast reconstruction can be performed at the same time as the mastectomy (immediate) or delayed to a second operation after cancer treatments. The reconstruction can either use the patients’ own tissue to make the breast (autologous) or use a prosthesis to make the breast in the form of a fixed or expandable volume implant (implant-based breast reconstruction, IBBR). Immediate breast reconstruction on top of the chest wall muscles (prepectoral) is performed worldwide. This operation involves the use of a synthetic or biological mesh placed around the implant under the skin. Increasingly, surgeons are performing this technique without the use of mesh. Both techniques, with and without mesh, have not been compared in a head-to-head randomised controlled trial (RCT); therefore, surgeons and patients do not have high quality data to guide their decision making in this area.

Methods and analysis

UK-based pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility of a definitive RCT comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of no-mesh versus mesh-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction. Secondary objectives will explore patient understanding of mesh and willingness to be randomised within an RCT; determine if it is possible to collect data to inform a future economic analysis on the use of mesh in breast reconstruction and determine the feasibility of measuring breast biomechanics pre-surgery and post breast reconstruction surgery. Total number of patients to be included: 40 (20 per arm).

Ethics and dissemination

This study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been obtained. Ethics Ref: 23/SC/0302; IRAS Project ID: 301 423. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, independent of the results, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials standards for RCTs.

Trial registration numbers

NCT06112977; ISRCTN17470747.

Developing an approach to enhance recruitment for a cluster-randomised implementation trial: leveraging deliberative participation and credible messengers

Por: Vaughn · V. M. · Horowitz · J. · Gandhi · T. · Neetz · R. A. · Petty · L. · Hersh · A. · Lindenauer · P. · Bernstein · S. J. · Flanders · S. A. · Harrison · J. D. · Smith · J. D. · White · A. T. · Szymczak · J. E.
Objectives

To evaluate an innovative approach to recruit 40 hospitals to a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to improve discharge antibiotic prescribing.

Design

This study describes the design, implementation and impact of a theory-informed recruitment approach for hospitals participating in the Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics at Discharge (ROAD) Home trial.

Setting

An inperson meeting of a quality improvement collaborative of acute care hospitals in the state of Michigan.

Participants

Representatives from acute care hospitals that are part of the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.

Interventions

Small group recruitment sessions that combined deliberative participation and credible messengers to recruit hospitals to participate in a cluster RCT on a single date (1 November 2023).

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary outcome was the number of hospitals which agreed to participate in the trial. We also assessed participant feedback, effectiveness of recruitment methods and resources required for implementation of this approach.

Results

We recruited 51 (74%) of 69 eligible hospitals. Survey participants reported: sessions made clear the purpose of the trial (94%, 64/68) and time commitment required (87%, 59/68); agreed deliberative participation was helpful (82%, 56/68) and were ‘very satisfied’ with the session (82%, 56/68). Investigators largely reported credible messengers were a positive influence, though this varied across sessions. Hospital recruitment was time intensive, taking 179.5 total person hours. The recruitment process involved 3 months of preparation for the sessions and 2 months of follow-up prior to closing recruitment.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the feasibility and impact of a novel approach to recruit hospitals from an existing collaborative to a cluster RCT using the principles of deliberative participation and credible messengers. While the approach was time-consuming, we achieved success at over-recruiting hospitals in a relatively short period of time. Strategies presented here may assist future trial organisers in implementing hospital-based cluster RCTs.

Trial registration number

The ROAD Home trial is registered on Clinical.Trials.gov (NCT06106204).

❌