Persistent pain after finishing breast cancer treatment is a common and disabling problem. The current state-of-the-art pain management advocates, in addition to biomedical (non-)pharmacological approaches, a biopsychosocial rehabilitation approach to address persistent pain, combining pain science education with promoting an active lifestyle through self-regulation techniques. We propose testing an innovative eHealth self-management support programme for this purpose in the breast cancer population with persistent pain after finishing cancer treatment. This delivery mode is believed to reduce barriers to pain self-management by providing timely, safe and cost-effective assistance addressing the biopsychosocial needs of patients. Utilising a chatbot format, the eHealth programme delivers pain science education and promotes physical activity (PA), personalised through decision-tree-based algorithms to support pain self-management. The programme aims to empower patients with understanding, coping skills and self-management techniques to reduce pain-related disability and enhance participation in daily life. The primary objective is to determine programme effectiveness compared with (1) usual care (superiority) and (2) a similar face-to-face pain self-management support programme (non-inferiority).
A pragmatic, three-arm randomised controlled trial was started in April 2024 at the University Hospitals of Antwerp and Leuven and primary care settings in Belgium. Participants are breast cancer survivors with persistent pain after finishing cancer treatment. Two hundred seventy participants will be randomised to one of three trial arms: (1) eHealth self-management support programme, (2) usual care or (3) a face-to-face self-management support programme. The ‘eHealth self-management support programme’ begins with a pain science education (PSE) module to initially convey key pain-related concepts and provide personalised pain management tips. Then, the programme progresses to daily activity planning to promote an active lifestyle. Guided by the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model, participants set and review daily activity goals and track progress. The eHealth self-management programme uses a chatbot and is accessible on any digital device. The ‘usual care programme’ involves sending the participants a study-specific brochure by postal mail and does not include any formal PSE and/or PA programmes. They may pursue or continue self-initiated care. In Belgium, usual care primarily involves pharmacological treatment, general advice on PA and the provision of informational brochures. The ‘face-to-face self-management support programme’ mirrors the eHealth intervention, combining PSE with PA coaching. It starts with three individual sessions with a trained physical therapist for biopsychosocial assessment and PSE, followed by six sessions on goal setting and active lifestyle coaching. The educational content is delivered both verbally and in written form. The primary outcome will be pain-related disability 6 months after baseline assessment. As a key secondary outcome, the effect on pain beliefs and attitudes will be investigated after the educational part of the eHealth and face-to-face programme (ie, at 6 weeks after baseline). Other secondary outcomes related to other dimensions of pain and physical-, psychosocial- and health-economic outcomes will be assessed at 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months after baseline as well.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2024). The protocol has been approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospitals of Leuven and Antwerp. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at congresses. Ethical Committee of the University Hospitals Leuven and Antwerp: BUN B3002023000132.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06308029.
Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) at the arm and/or trunk/breast is a highly feared complication following breast cancer treatment and can be objectified using the state-of-the-art criteria based on volume, extracellular water ratio or skin thickness measurements. Although the incidence of objective BCRL is decreasing due to advances in breast cancer treatment, many patients report a sensation of swelling without the presence of objective BCRL, referred to as subjective BCRL. As little is known about the prevalence and the transitions between different BCRL states (no-subjective-objective) over time, as well as about the underlying mechanisms and contributing factors of subjective BCRL, this will be investigated in the LymphSens study.
230 patients with a new diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer will be included in a multicentre longitudinal study. Measurements are performed from presurgery to 12 months postsurgery. The primary objective (aim 1) is to determine the prevalence rate of subjective and objective BCRL at 1, 6 and 12 month(s) postsurgery, as well as transitions between BCRL states (no-subjective-objective BCRL) by a multinomial logistic regression model with generalised estimating equations and transition matrices, respectively. A second objective (aim 2) is to determine factors related to four potential underlying mechanisms (lymphatic, nociceptive, neuropathic and central sensory processing problems) that contribute to the occurrence of subjective BCRL in comparison with no self-reported swelling and objective BCRL. As a third objective (aim 3), within the group of patients with subjective BCRL, we will determine factors related to these four underlying mechanisms that contribute to the severity of subjective BCRL. The analyses for aim 2 and aim 3 will be conducted both at specific time points, that is, 1, 6 and 12 month(s) postsurgery using exploratory analysis and across all time points collectively using multivariable binary logistic regression models or multivariable longitudinal models for repeated measures.
The LymphSens study protocol received approval from the Ethics Committee of UZ Leuven (S68133) and UZ Antwerp/University of Antwerp (5676-003252). The results of the LymphSens study will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Currently, no effective therapy exists to reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in reducing AKI in outpatient settings for patients with chronic kidney disease. We hypothesised that perioperative SGLT2 inhibition will also reduce AKI incidence after cardiac surgery according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria.
We designed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded, superiority trial. A total of 784 patients, aged above 18 years, undergoing cardiac surgery will be included with stratification for sex and type 2 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will receive either dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo from the day before until 2 days after surgery. Serum creatinine will be measured preoperatively and daily for the first 7 days after the operation, and urine output will be measured until the urinary catheter is removed. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative AKI according to the KDIGO criteria.
The medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC) and the Dutch competent authority approved the study protocol (currently, version 9, 19 January 2024). This is an investigator-initiated study. The Amsterdam UMC, as sponsor, retains ownership of all data and publication rights. After completion of the trial, results will be disseminated to participants, patient societies and physicians via a network meeting and digital newsletter. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed international medical journal and presented on (inter)national congresses.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05590143.