Conectar
Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease characterised by cognitive, behavioural and motor problems. Motor symptoms are highly disabling, while cognitive and behavioural changes have a major impact on carer burden, quality of life and prognosis. Apathy and impulsivity are very common, often coexistent in PSP, and negatively predict survival. In preclinical models and other diseases, apathy and impulsivity are associated with noradrenergic deficits, which can be severe in PSP.
Noradrenaline for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Syndromes trial is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, Phase IIb clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral atomoxetine for the treatment of cognitive and behavioural changes in PSP. Participants receive atomoxetine 40 mg (10 mg/mL oral solution) once daily or a matched placebo solution, in random order, each for 8 weeks. An ‘informant’, who knows the patient with PSP well, is co-recruited to complete some of the trial outcome measures. Participants remain in the trial for 22 weeks after randomisation. The primary objectives are to assess (1) safety and tolerability and (2) efficacy versus placebo on challenging behaviours as reported in a subscale of the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory. Secondary and exploratory measures relate to cognition, the PSP Rating Scale, mood and potential baseline predictors of individual response to atomoxetine computed from imaging, genetic and cognitive measures at baseline.
The trial was approved by the South Central-Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (REC) and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (REC reference: 20/SC/0416). Dissemination will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic and public conferences and engagement with patients, the public, policymakers and practitioners.
ISRCTN99462035; DOI:
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces morbidity and mortality and remains widely underused. An HFrEF polypill containing all four pillars of GDMT has been proposed as an implementation strategy to improve GDMT treatment rates and subsequent patient outcomes. We present the design and protocol for a proof-of-concept, pilot type I hybrid randomised clinical trial evaluating an HFrEF polypill compared with usual care among patients with HFrEF in Sri Lanka to evaluate short-term feasibility.
This multi-centre, open-label, pilot type I hybrid randomised clinical trial will recruit 40 adults with HFrEF from two public hospital sites in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Participants will be randomised to an HFrEF polypill (containing bisoprolol, losartan, eplerenone, and dapagliflozin in three available strengths) or usual care and followed for 4 weeks. The primary outcome is feasibility of recruitment measured by recruitment rate and adherence to study protocols measured by completion rate of study-related procedures. Other key outcomes include adherence to GDMT and assessment of serious adverse events among other exploratory outcomes.
The study has been approved by the ethics review committee at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya (Sri Lanka), the institutional review board at Washington University in St. Louis (United States), and the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (Sri Lanka). The findings of this pilot trial will inform the design and implementation of a future large-scale type I hybrid trial to assess the efficacy and safety of an HFrEF polypill in improving clinical outcomes.
Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry (SLCTR/2024/003); ClinicalTrials Registry (NCT06831864).
High blood pressure (BP) is a significant global health issue, with many treated patients failing to achieve BP control. The Triple Pill vs Usual Care Management for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial evaluated the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of early use of low-dose triple fixed-dose combination of BP-lowering drugs (‘triple pill’) compared with usual care in the management of hypertension. The TRIUMPH trial showed superior BP control with the triple pill strategy compared with usual care. This process evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial aimed to explore the contextual factors that influenced the trial outcomes, implementation of the triple pill strategy, mechanisms of its effects and potential barriers and facilitators for implementing the triple pill strategy in routine practice.
Guided by the UK Medical Research Council’s framework, semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 patients and 13 healthcare providers involved in the TRIUMPH trial. Data were analysed using the framework analysis method in NVivo.
Hypertension care in Sri Lanka was hindered by the absence of systematic screening and overcrowded public clinics. Despite free medication provision at public clinics, long waiting times and occasional stock-outs posed challenges. In the TRIUMPH trial, both intervention and usual care were delivered in the context of ‘better than usual’ care, including team-based management, reduced waiting times, monetary assistance for travel, routine adherence monitoring and intensive follow-up. The triple pill strategy provided a simplified regimen, better access to BP-lowering medications and better BP-lowering efficacy. Key barriers to implementation in routine practice included the triple pill’s large size, therapeutic inertia and restrictive regulatory policies regarding fixed-dose combinations.
Implementation of the triple pill strategy into routine practice requires health system strengthening, provider training and supportive policy measures to replicate its effectiveness seen in the trial.
ACTRN12612001120864, SLCTR/2015/020.
The purpose of this study was to determine how strongly mean systolic blood pressure (mSBP, mm Hg) was related to hypertension control and if an mSBP
mSBP and per cent control to
SPRINT randomised participants with hypertension to two SBP targets:
SPRINT participants with year 2 data. Patients in MAP (had hypertension, were aged≥18 years, had ≥2 healthcare visits from November 2019 through October 2021 and received care from clinicians (n=544) with ≥24 patients.
mSBP and control to
In SPRINT-S (n=4303) and SPRINT-I (n=4323), mSBP values at the last visit were 136.7 and 121.7 with BP
mSBP is strongly related to hypertension control. Moreover, mSBP
by Ana Paula Serafini Poeta Silva, Guilherme Arruda Cezar, Edison Sousa Magalhães, Kinath Rupasinghe, Srijita Chandra, Gustavo S. Silva, Marcelo Almeida, Bret Crim, Eric Burrough, Phillip Gauger, Christopher Siepker, Marta Mainenti, Michael Zeller, Rodger G. Main, Mary Thurn, Paulo Fioravante, Cesar Corzo, Albert Rovira, Hemant Naikare, Rob McGaughey, Franco Matias Ferreyra, Jamie Retallick, Jordan Gebhardt, Angela Pillatzki, Jon Greseth, Darren Kersey, Travis Clement, Jane Christopher-Hennings, Melanie Prarat, Ashley Johnson, Dennis Summers, Craig Bowen, Kenitra Hendrix, Joseph Boyle, Daniel Correia Lima Linhares, Giovani Trevisan
This study evaluated the use of endemic enteric coronaviruses polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative testing results as an alternative approach to detect the emergence of animal health threats with similar clinical diseases presentation. This retrospective study, conducted in the United States, used PCR-negative testing results from porcine samples tested at six veterinary diagnostic laboratories. As a proof of concept, the database was first searched for transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) negative submissions between January 1st, 2010, through April 29th, 2013, when the first porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) case was diagnosed. Secondly, TGEV- and PEDV-negative submissions were used to detect the porcine delta coronavirus (PDCoV) emergence in 2014. Lastly, encountered best detection algorithms were implemented to prospectively monitor the 2023 enteric coronavirus-negative submissions. Time series (weekly TGEV-negative counts) and Seasonal Autoregressive-Integrated Moving-Average (SARIMA) were used to control for outliers, trends, and seasonality. The SARIMA’s fitted and residuals were then subjected to anomaly detection algorithms (EARS, EWMA, CUSUM, Farrington) to identify alarms, defined as weeks of higher TGEV-negativity than what was predicted by models preceding the PEDV emergence. The best-performing detection algorithms had the lowest false alarms (number of alarms detected during the baseline) and highest time to detect (number of weeks between the first alarm and PEDV emergence). The best-performing detection algorithms were CUSUM, EWMA, and Farrington flexible using SARIMA fitted values, having a lower false alarm rate and identified alarms 4 to 17 weeks before PEDV and PDCoV emergences. No alarms were identified in the 2023 enteric negative testing results. The negative-based monitoring system functioned in the case of PEDV propagating epidemic and in the presence of a concurrent propagating epidemic with the PDCoV emergence. It demonstrated its applicability as an additional tool for diagnostic data monitoring of emergent pathogens having similar clinical disease as the monitored endemic pathogens.
FreshRSS 