To develop a context-specific health technology assessment (HTA) framework tailored to the healthcare needs and system of Iran, to improve evidence-based decision-making, optimise resource allocation and support progress towards universal health coverage.

A mixed-methods Delphi consensus study conducted using a three-phase, sequential approach: document review, qualitative focus group discussions and Delphi consensus rounds. The study reporting follows the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document guideline to ensure transparent reporting of consensus methods.

A national-level study conducted in Iran’s healthcare system between January 2023 and March 2024, including perspectives from public and academic institutions, policy bodies and patient organisations.

The study involved 18 purposively selected stakeholders in three focus group discussions, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives. Subsequently, 20 HTA experts participated in three iterative Delphi rounds to refine and reach consensus on the framework components.

Identification of core components and operational steps required to develop and implement a comprehensive HTA framework in Iran.

The final HTA framework includes nine core components: (1) establishing a national HTA body; (2) engaging stakeholders; (3) building capacity through training and research; (4) developing standard HTA methodologies; (5) implementing prioritisation and evaluation processes; (6) ensuring sustainable funding; (7) enhancing transparency and accountability; (8) promoting continuous improvement and (9) fostering innovation. Detailed operational steps and micro-activities were developed for each component. The framework achieved an 84% consensus among Delphi panellists, indicating strong agreement on its content and applicability.

This tailored HTA framework provides a structured roadmap to institutionalise evidence-based decision-making in Iran’s healthcare system. Its implementation can strengthen the efficiency, equity and sustainability of healthcare planning and policy. Pilot testing is recommended to assess feasibility and scalability, with potential to serve as a model for other low-income and middle-income countries.

Depressive symptoms are common in the growing geriatric surgical population and are associated with important patient-centred surgical outcomes, including postoperative delirium, discharge to postacute care facility and decline in functional status. Few interventions have been developed to address depressive symptoms in the perioperative setting.

We designed a feasibility and acceptability study of a nine-session problem-solving therapy (PST) telehealth perioperative intervention aimed at reducing postoperative functional decline and depressive symptoms among at-risk older adults undergoing major surgical procedures. Acceptability will be evaluated using a patient-centred five-question survey, assessing participant satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the perioperative intervention. A feasibility assessment will rely on objective measures including ease of participant recruitment, frequency and timing of delivery of intervention sessions and retention of participants throughout the duration of the intervention. With respect to the efficacy of the proposed PST intervention, the primary outcome of interest is postoperative functional status, as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 at the 6-month postoperative time point. The secondary outcome of interest is the degree of depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at both 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The broader goals of this study include: (1) assessing the feasibility of implementing a PST perioperative intervention for older surgical patients at risk of postoperative functional decline, (2) demonstrating the acceptability of the PST intervention and (3) assessing the preliminary impact of the PST intervention on postoperative functional status and depressive symptoms.

The study received ethical approval from the University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board. Results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with further dissemination at local institutional meetings and professional conferences.

NCT06174701.