Salvage prostatic bed radiotherapy (PBRT) is a standard in case of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC). The management of isolated prostatic bed recurrence following RP and PBRT is debated. Reirradiation within stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) guided by metabolic imaging could be a relevant option in this case. In parallel, metformin, an economically viable and well-tolerated oral antidiabetic agent, has demonstrated its radiosensitising properties. This phase I/II clinical trial aims to (i) determine the optimal dose for SBRT reirradiation, (ii) conduct safety assessments and (iii) evaluate the efficacy of the metformin and SBRT combination.

We conducted a prospective, non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, dose escalation, phase I/II study involving a minimum of 44 patients. Eligible patients must have biochemical recurrence (Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)>0.2 ng/mL and confirmed ascending trend in at least two successive assays), occurring at least 2 years after PBRT and prior RP for PC (including low, intermediate and high risk with a single risk factor) and no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade>=2 toxicity following PBRT. The recurrence should be visible on MRI and/or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Choline and/or PET PSMA, without evidence of pelvic lymph node recurrence or metastatic disease. The primary objective of phase I is to determine the optimal SBRT dose (5x6, 6x6, or 5x5 Gy) based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The dose will be chosen using a time-to-event continual reassessment method based on DLT, defined as CTCAE grade ≥3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity, or any other grade 4 adverse event. The primary outcome of the phase II is to estimate the efficacy of SBRT in combination with metformin in terms of biological relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate at 3 years. Secondary outcomes include 5-year bRFS rate, early/late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, quality of life, biochemical response rate, clinical progression-free survival and overall survival (OS).

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics committee "SUD EST III Bron" Ref.CPP 2020-042B (20.05.07.72735) and the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines (ANSM) Ref. ANSM MEDAECNAT-2020-05-00009. The ethics approval obtained covers all the sites that will take part in this study. The study’s findings will be disseminated through publications and conference presentations.

NCT04536805, Registration Date: 2020-08-17

Transporting critically ill patients between medical facilities can be hazardous and costly. Whether by road, fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter, many professional associations have proposed strategies to efficiently and safely transport patients at high risk of instability. Although these strategies have been assessed in some studies, no comprehensive synthesis of their benefits has been conducted to date. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of strategies to improve the safety and costs of interhospital transports for critically ill patients.

We will conduct a systematic review according to the Cochrane guidelines. The review will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case-control studies assessing the effect of interventions to improve interhospital transports of critically ill patients on safety and costs. We will search multiple electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) from inception to 6 months prior to the submission of the final manuscript. Screening by title and abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers. We will assess the risk of bias with the Cochrane revised tool for RCTs and with the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool. If possible, we will calculate pooled effect estimates and 95% CIs to assess the effect of the interventions. We will also assess heterogeneity using the I² index and rate the certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool and trial sequential analysis.

Ethics approval is not required for this review. The results of this systematic review will be shared through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations and our network of knowledge user collaborators.

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024595080).