This study aims to describe current nurse prescribing practices in the absence of a legal framework, evaluate healthcare providers' preferred prescribing models, and their perceptions of the impact of nurse prescribing in Belgian hospitals.
Multicentre quantitative, cross-sectional survey.
Between December 2022 and April 2023, healthcare providers from seven Flemish hospitals completed an online survey after being presented with a short explanatory video on independent and supplementary nurse prescribing. The survey assessed demographics, current practices, expected impact and preferred prescribing models.
Of the 303 respondents, 86% were nurses, 10% were medical doctors and 4% were pharmacists.
Independent nurse prescribing or deprescribing of medications was reported by 75% in their current work context. Nurse prescribing was observed weekly or daily by 48%, primarily for initiating new medications. Overall, 44% preferred independent nurse prescribing over no prescribing.
Despite the absence of a legal framework, nurses in Belgian hospitals regularly prescribe medications. Most healthcare providers positively perceive the expected impact of nurse prescribing.
There is an urgent need for legal and institutional frameworks that acknowledge existing practices, define responsibilities and support safe and effective care. Structured policies could improve interprofessional collaboration, clarify clinical accountability and ensure consistent training for nurse prescribers.
This study addressed the widespread but informal practice of nurse prescribing in the absence of legal regulation in Belgium. It found that a majority of healthcare providers observed nurse prescribing in clinical practice and preferred formalised prescribing models. These insights can support health authorities, healthcare decision-makers and educators in designing regulations, implementation strategies and curricula aligned with clinical practice.
The authors adhered to the STROBE reporting checklist for cross-sectional studies.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, analysis or reporting.
To investigate factors influencing the implementation of advanced practice nursing roles within healthcare organisations in seven European countries from the perspective of advanced practice nurses.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between September 2021 and December 2022, involving advanced practice nurses from Belgium, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Spain and the Netherlands. The countries were selected to represent different stages of implementing advanced practice nursing roles, from emerging to well-established.
A self-administered questionnaire was used to address five domains: patient care, practice patterns, policy and legal, educational and workforce-related factors. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests and correspondence analysis were employed to identify patterns and country-specific differences across these domains of implementation factors.
A total of 491 advanced practice nurses participated in the study. While almost three-quarters of the participants indicated satisfaction with their job, the study highlighted multifaceted factors influencing the implementation of advanced practice nursing roles across countries. The Netherlands, Ireland and Belgium reported mainly facilitators, whereas Finland, Iceland and Germany noted barriers or a lack of knowledge. Spain mostly reported neutral or moderate positions. Key challenges included role ambiguity, interprofessional collaboration gaps, limited managerial support, workload imbalances, limited mentorship and underutilised competencies. Results also indicated that advanced practice nurses are partially hindered by operating in isolation from other professions.
The findings emphasise the need for robust organisational support, interprofessional collaboration and clear role definitions to facilitate the integration of advanced practice nursing roles. Addressing professional isolation through networking and mentorship is crucial to sustaining the advanced practice nursing workforce.
Policy should prioritise support for advanced practice nursing, including structured mentoring and networking opportunities. Further research on advanced practice nurses' well-being and long-term role sustainability in Europe is recommended.
What problem did the study address? What were the main findings? Where and on whom will the research have an impact?
This study reported factors influencing advanced practice nurse role implementation across seven European countries with different levels of role development. Key challenges included role ambiguity, interprofessional collaboration gaps and limited support. The findings can guide healthcare managers and policymakers on the key factors to consider when integrating advanced practice nursing roles into their teams.
The Belgian healthcare system is to a large extent hospital-centred, prompting government initiatives to shift care towards patient’s homes and reduce hospital stays. To avoid unnecessary hospital stays and offer alternative and innovative forms of care, the Belgian federal health authorities selected five pilot projects for transmural care for chronically ill children. Guided by the Medical Research Council framework, this study aims to evaluate the paediatric transmural care projects to inform new models for paediatric care.
Using a mixed-methods realist evaluation, the study comprises three phases: (1) initial programme theory development, (2) initial programme theory testing and (3) programme theory refinement. In a first phase, the initial programme theory rooted in the normalisation process theory will be refined from insights retrieved from document review and focus group interviews with healthcare professionals. In the second phase, the initial programme theory will be tested using empirical data. Routine data and questionnaires will examine whether characteristics of participants and outcomes are in line with the quintuple aim framework. Focus groups with children, parents and stakeholders, and document analysis will be used to evaluate the structure of the intervention, examine the process and context, and understand more in-depth the outcomes. A budget impact analysis will be used to assess whether the pilot project is affordable. In a third phase, qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed using a convergent mixed-methods model, involving continuous triangulation of multiple data sets to facilitate greater understanding of the context and refinement of the programme theory.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ghent University Hospital (Belgian Registration Number B6702024000193) after consultation with all Ethics Committees of the participating hospitals. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or their legal representatives prior to data collection. Participant confidentiality will be maintained throughout the study. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at national and international conferences. The general population will be informed of the aggregated results.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06679595.