Increasing awareness of the high frequency, wide spectrum and disabling nature of symptoms that can persist following COVID-19 infection has prompted the investigation of management strategies. Our study aims to determine the effectiveness of atorvastatin on cognitive function, physical activity, mood, health-related quality of life and features of neurovascular impairment and neuroinflammation in adults with ongoing neurological symptoms after COVID-19 infection.
The STatin TReatment for COVID-19 to Optimise NeuroloGical recovERy study is an ongoing international, investigator-initiated and conducted, multicentre, prospective, randomised, open label, blinded endpoint trial with fixed time points for outcome assessments. A total of 410 participants with long covid neurological symptoms were planned to be randomly assigned to either the intervention group to receive 40 mg atorvastatin for 12 months or to a control group of no treatment, on top of usual care.
This study protocol was designed, implemented and reported, in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and with the ethical principles laid down in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Central ethics committee approval was obtained from Sydney Local Health District Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Ethics (No: X21-0113 and 2021/ETH00777 10) in Australia. Site-specific ethics committee approvals were obtained elsewhere before any local study activities. All participants provided written informed consent.
The study protocol is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04904536).
Objetivo principal: Identificar el número y tipo de abreviaturas estandarizadas utilizadas al elaborar los registros de enfermería en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) del Hospital Universitario de Torrevieja. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo transversal realizado con una muestra de 641 registros de enfermería de 25 Historias Clínicas. Resultados principales: El glosario de abreviaturas, siglas y acrónimos fue filtrado en bases terminológicas para comprobar si existía una estandarización a las mismas. De la muestra de los 641 registros se identificaron un total de 3.445 abreviaturas, siglas y acrónimos, siendo 247 diferentes entre sí. Los vocablos identificados están reconocidos en un 45,5 %, en el primero de los diccionarios, aumentando el porcentaje al 51,2 % en la base segunda base terminológica. Conclusión principal: El uso de las abreviaturas, siglas y acrónimos puede generar problemas de comprensión e interferir en la seguridad de los pacientes, aconsejándose la protocolización de su uso para no deteriorar la calidad asistencial.