Salvage prostatic bed radiotherapy (PBRT) is a standard in case of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC). The management of isolated prostatic bed recurrence following RP and PBRT is debated. Reirradiation within stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) guided by metabolic imaging could be a relevant option in this case. In parallel, metformin, an economically viable and well-tolerated oral antidiabetic agent, has demonstrated its radiosensitising properties. This phase I/II clinical trial aims to (i) determine the optimal dose for SBRT reirradiation, (ii) conduct safety assessments and (iii) evaluate the efficacy of the metformin and SBRT combination.

We conducted a prospective, non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, dose escalation, phase I/II study involving a minimum of 44 patients. Eligible patients must have biochemical recurrence (Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)>0.2 ng/mL and confirmed ascending trend in at least two successive assays), occurring at least 2 years after PBRT and prior RP for PC (including low, intermediate and high risk with a single risk factor) and no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade>=2 toxicity following PBRT. The recurrence should be visible on MRI and/or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Choline and/or PET PSMA, without evidence of pelvic lymph node recurrence or metastatic disease. The primary objective of phase I is to determine the optimal SBRT dose (5x6, 6x6, or 5x5 Gy) based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The dose will be chosen using a time-to-event continual reassessment method based on DLT, defined as CTCAE grade ≥3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity, or any other grade 4 adverse event. The primary outcome of the phase II is to estimate the efficacy of SBRT in combination with metformin in terms of biological relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate at 3 years. Secondary outcomes include 5-year bRFS rate, early/late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, quality of life, biochemical response rate, clinical progression-free survival and overall survival (OS).

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics committee "SUD EST III Bron" Ref.CPP 2020-042B (20.05.07.72735) and the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines (ANSM) Ref. ANSM MEDAECNAT-2020-05-00009. The ethics approval obtained covers all the sites that will take part in this study. The study’s findings will be disseminated through publications and conference presentations.

NCT04536805, Registration Date: 2020-08-17

Intensive care units (ICUs) manage patients with or likely to have one or more life-threatening acute organ failures that might require the use of invasive supportive therapies. The use of physical restraint is frequent, with rates up to 50%, and usually initiated to maintain patient safety especially if the patient is agitated. Physical restraints have been associated with delirium, post-traumatic stress disorder and physical injuries while restricting patients’ individual freedom. Moreover, the incidence of invasive therapeutic devices’ self-removal by patients might not be decreased by physical restraint use. No recommendation is available concerning ICU patients and physical restraint management, despite being a daily practice. The main objective is to evaluate whether a strategy aimed at decreasing physical restraint use in ICU patients with that of a strategy based on routine and subjective caregivers’ decision is safe and efficient.

ARBORea is a multicentre randomised, stepped-wedge trial testing an innovative, dedicated web-based, multiprofessionally developed, experts validated, nursing management strategy in comparison with standard care. The primary outcome is physical restraint use rate (effectiveness) measured at least every 8 hours and incidents’ rate (tolerance) defined as the rate of incidents attributable to non-compliance, corresponding to the deterioration or self-removal of critical devices, a fall or self-aggressive or heteroaggressive behaviours. Planned enrolment is 4000 ICU adult participants at 20 French academic and non-academic centres. Safety and long-term outcomes will be evaluated.

Trial results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international meetings and conferences to publicise and explain the research to clinicians, commissioners and service users. The trial is funded by the French Ministry of Health and has been approved by the French local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer 2, Toulouse, France with registration number: 2020-A02904-35).

(ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04957238 on 12 July 2021 before first inclusion in study.