FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerBMJ Open

Stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a decision support tool for physical restraint use in intensive care units (ARBORea Study): a study protocol

Por: Vidal · P. · Lambert · C. · Pereira · B. · Martinez · R. · Araujo · L. · Yakhni · M. · Rolhion · C. · Morand · D. · Cosserant · S. · Genes · I. · Godet · T. · Barage · A. · on behalf of the ARBORea Collaborative group · Bourenne · Antoine · Lhotellier · Berrahal · Piot · Degivry · Boy
Introduction

Intensive care units (ICUs) manage patients with or likely to have one or more life-threatening acute organ failures that might require the use of invasive supportive therapies. The use of physical restraint is frequent, with rates up to 50%, and usually initiated to maintain patient safety especially if the patient is agitated. Physical restraints have been associated with delirium, post-traumatic stress disorder and physical injuries while restricting patients’ individual freedom. Moreover, the incidence of invasive therapeutic devices’ self-removal by patients might not be decreased by physical restraint use. No recommendation is available concerning ICU patients and physical restraint management, despite being a daily practice. The main objective is to evaluate whether a strategy aimed at decreasing physical restraint use in ICU patients with that of a strategy based on routine and subjective caregivers’ decision is safe and efficient.

Methods and analysis

ARBORea is a multicentre randomised, stepped-wedge trial testing an innovative, dedicated web-based, multiprofessionally developed, experts validated, nursing management strategy in comparison with standard care. The primary outcome is physical restraint use rate (effectiveness) measured at least every 8 hours and incidents’ rate (tolerance) defined as the rate of incidents attributable to non-compliance, corresponding to the deterioration or self-removal of critical devices, a fall or self-aggressive or heteroaggressive behaviours. Planned enrolment is 4000 ICU adult participants at 20 French academic and non-academic centres. Safety and long-term outcomes will be evaluated.

Ethics and dissemination

Trial results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international meetings and conferences to publicise and explain the research to clinicians, commissioners and service users. The trial is funded by the French Ministry of Health and has been approved by the French local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer 2, Toulouse, France with registration number: 2020-A02904-35).

Trial registration number

(ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04957238 on 12 July 2021 before first inclusion in study.

Group cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia compared with treatment as usual for sleep problems in psychiatric care (the SIP trials): a protocol for a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial

Por: Wilhelmsen-Langeland · A. · Saxvig · I. W. · Gradisar · M. · Vagenes · V. A. · Pallesen · S. · Sorensen · L. · Fasmer · O.-B. · Koenig · J. · Bjorvatn · B. · Osnes · B.
Introduction

Insomnia is prevalent in psychiatric populations and may contribute to maintain and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) is the treatment of choice also for insomnia comorbid to psychiatric illness. However, patients are rarely offered CBTi in psychiatric outpatient clinics. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether CBTi delivered in groups in a psychiatric outpatient clinic is superior to treatment as usual (TAU).

Methods and analysis

In the Sleep in Psychiatric Care trial, 60 patients with moderate to severe psychiatric illness who meet the criteria for insomnia disorder will be recruited from an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Norway. The patients will be randomised (1:1) either to group-based CBTi (Sleep School Wake Up for Insomnia; SSWU-I) or to a wait list (WL) while they are all receiving TAU for their psychiatric disorder. SSWU-I will comprise five bi-weekly sessions, each lasting 120 min, hence the treatment period is 8 weeks. Assessment will be conducted at baseline (T1) and after 8 weeks (T2). The primary outcome will be self-rated insomnia symptoms using the Insomnia Severity Index and the Bergen Insomnia Scale. Secondary outcomes include measures of symptoms of dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, depression, anxiety, fatigue, problems with work and social adjustment and well-being. Mixed model analyses will be conducted to test the hypotheses.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, in Western Norway (REK 2020/66304). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at research conferences and in relevant media. The results may document the need for specific sleep-directed treatments in psychiatric clinics as a way of treating insomnia disorder as well as to alleviate psychiatric symptoms.

Trial registration number

NCT04463498.

Group bright light therapy compared to treatment as usual for delayed sleep-wake phase disorder among patients in psychiatric care (the SIP trials): a protocol for a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial

Por: Wilhelmsen-Langeland · A. · Osnes · B. · Gradisar · M. · Vagenes · V. A. · Sorensen · L. · Bjorvatn · B. · Fasmer · O.-B. · Koenig · J. · Pallesen · S. · Saxvig · I. W.
Introduction

Circadian rhythm sleep–wake disturbances appear to be prevalent in psychiatric populations and may maintain and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms. Bright light therapy (BLT) is, in addition to exogenous melatonin, the treatment of choice for circadian rhythm disorders like delayed sleep–wake phase disorder (DSWPD) and has yielded promising results in patients with comorbid psychiatric illness. However, such patients are rarely offered this treatment in outpatient clinics. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether group BLT for psychiatric outpatients is superior to treatment as usual (TAU).

Methods and analysis

60 patients with moderate-to-severe psychiatric illness who meet the criteria for DSWPD will be recruited from an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Norway. They will be randomised (1:1) to a group-based Sleep School Wake Up! For Circadian (SSWU-C) programme conjointly with TAU or to TAU while on a wait list for SSWU-C. The SSWU-C will be delivered over four biweekly sessions, each lasting 120 min; hence treatment will last 6 weeks. Assessments will be collected at baseline (T1) and after the intervention (T2). The primary outcome will be changes in sleep timing using measures such as sleep diaries, actigraphy and dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) at 6 weeks postintervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in other sleep metrics, symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, problems with work and social adjustment and well-being. Mixed models will be used for data analyses.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval was granted in 2020 by the Regional Ethics Committee in Western Norway (REK 2020/66304). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and be presented at research conferences and in relevant media. The results may document the need for more specific sleep-directed treatments in psychiatric clinics as a way of treating not only circadian rhythm sleep–wake disorders but also as a treatment to alleviate psychiatric symptoms.

Trial registration number

NCT05177055.

❌