FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerPLOS ONE Medicine&Health

Immunosuppression variably impacts outcomes for patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study

by Vijeeth Guggilla, Jennifer A. Pacheco, Alexandre M. Carvalho, Grant R. Whitmer, Anna E. Pawlowski, Jodi L. Johnson, Catherine A. Gao, Chad J. Achenbach, Theresa L. Walunas

Background

Adults with immunosuppression are more likely to develop severe COVID-19 than adults without immunosuppression. Less is known about differences in outcomes for adults with immunosuppression who are hospitalized with COVID-19.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 at Northwestern Medicine hospitals between 03/01/2020 and 05/31/2022 was performed. Regression analyses were performed comparing in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, oxygenation requirements, and hospital/ICU length of stay among patients without immunosuppression (n = 9079) and patients with immunosuppression (n = 873).

Results

Patients with immunosuppression had significantly higher mortality than patients without immunosuppression (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.11–1.60). This effect was even stronger when controlling for age at admission, diabetes, obesity, SARS-CoV-2 variant era, and COVID-19 medication use (adjusted OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.46–2.16). ICU admission (adjusted OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.41–1.90) and invasive ventilation (adjusted OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.36–2.06) were also significantly higher in patients with immunosuppression. Hospitalization length (median: 7 days) and ICU length of stay (median: 2.5 days) were longer in patients with immunosuppression compared to patients without immunosuppression (median: 5 days, adjusted p  Conclusions

Patients with immunosuppression had worse outcomes than patients without immunosuppression. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with solid organ transplant had the worst outcomes overall. Patients with HIV had similar outcomes as patients without immunosuppression unless CD4 cell count was low.

What, when, and how food and beverage are advertised on Ghanian television

by Morgan Boncyk, Krystal K. Rampalli, Marian N. Winters, Muskaan K. Makkar, Silver Nanema, Gideon S. Amevinya, Amos Laar, Edward A. Frongillo, Christine E. Blake

Food marketing has increased volume, precision, and reach to influence viewers’ food attitudes, beliefs, and eating behaviors. What and how much people eat has implications for health. While many countries regulate food advertising to protect consumers and encourage healthy eating, Ghana has none. Understanding the content and framing of food and beverage advertisements can inform the development of effective policies and practices that encourage healthier diets. This content analysis examines the foods and beverages advertised, their timing, and marketing techniques on Ghanaian television. From February to May 2020, 486 hours of advertisements were recorded. Advertisements with ≥1 actors were coded for food type, actor characteristics (i.e., body size, gender, age, race), and marketing techniques (i.e., promotional characters, premium offers, goal frames). A total of 607 advertisements with 2,043 actors were analyzed. Two-thirds (66.8%) promoted foods categorized as unhealthy. Sugar-sweetened beverages (22.6%) were most frequent, followed by grains high in sugar and low in fiber (13.2%), recipe additions (13.1%), and supplements (10.2%). Half (52.9%) of advertisements used persuasive marketing strategies. Most actors were classified as underweight (72.1% v. 20.5% normal weight, 7.4% overweight/obese) with a balanced gender distribution (49.1% female). Most advertisements aired during evenings (37.7%) and weekdays (69.5%). Morning advertisements promoted more healthy foods, whereas evening and night advertisements promoted more unhealthy foods. Gain goal frames were most common for healthy foods (p 

The changing role of substances: trends, characteristics of individuals and prior healthcare utilization among individuals with accidental substance-related toxicity deaths in Ontario Canada

by Shaleesa Ledlie, Alice Holton, Pamela Leece, Bisola Hamzat, Joanna Yang, Gillian Kolla, Nikki Bozinoff, Rob Boyd, Mike Franklyn, Ashley Smoke, Paul Newcombe, Tara Gomes

Objective

To investigate trends and the circumstances surrounding fatal substance-related toxicities directly attributed to alcohol, stimulants, benzodiazepines or opioids and combinations of substances in Ontario, Canada.

Methods

We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of all accidental substance-related toxicity deaths in Ontario, Canada from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022. We reported monthly rates of substance-related toxicity deaths and investigated the combination of substances most commonly involved in deaths. Demographic characteristics, location of incident, and prior healthcare encounters for non-fatal toxicities and substance use disorders were examined.

Results

Overall, 10,022 accidental substance-related toxicity deaths occurred, with the annual number of deaths nearly doubling between the first and last 12 months of the study period (N = 1,570–2,702). Opioids were directly involved in the majority of deaths (84.1%; N = 8,431), followed by stimulants (60.9%; N = 6,108), alcohol (13.4%; N = 1,346) and benzodiazepines (7.8%; N = 782). In total, 56.9% (N = 5,698) of deaths involved combinations of substances. Approximately one-fifth of individuals were treated in a hospital setting for a substance-related toxicity in the past year, with the majority being opioid-related (17.4%; N = 1,748). Finally, 60.9% (N = 6,098) of people had a substance use disorder diagnosis at time of death.

Conclusions

Our study shows not only the enormous loss of life from substance-related toxicities but also the growing importance of combinations of substances in these deaths. A large proportion of people had previously interacted within an hospital setting for prior substance-related toxicity events or related to a substance use disorder, representing important missed intervention points in providing appropriate care.

Exploring the patient’s recovery journey and information needs following a shoulder fracture: A qualitative interview study

by Pauline May, Firoza Davies, Gillian Yeowell, Chris Littlewood

Background

Shoulder fractures (proximal humerus fractures) are common, painful, debilitating injuries. Recovery is a long process often hindered by complications such as mal-union and frozen shoulder. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences and information needs of people at different time points after a shoulder fracture and how views on recovery change over time.

Methods

This longitudinal telephone interview study used a semi-structured approach based on a pre-planned interview topic guide. Recruitment was from June to November 2023. Participants were interviewed approximately two months and five to six months after their injury. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

14 participants were recruited (age range 44–80 years; three male). The themes identified were dependence, vulnerability, information needs, and recovery. Loss of function and identity were associated with dependence. Feelings of vulnerability were present for most participants at six months post-injury. Information needs evolved, with information about the extent of the injury and practical advice needed first, but later participants emphasized the importance of reassurance and expected timelines for recovery. Recovery meant regaining function and independence, and returning to meaningful activities, which was also not fully achieved for most participants by six months.

Conclusions

This study is the first to explore information needs and experiences along the timeline of recovery from a shoulder fracture. What recovery means to individual patients, along with recognition of the extent to which feelings of vulnerability affect recovery are important factors to consider. Clinicians should be aware of the full impact of these injuries to guide patients on their recovery journey, including identifying feelings of vulnerability and regaining their identity. Adopting a person-centred care approach, and considering the changing priorities and information needs of patients throughout their recovery journey may lead to improved patient care.

❌