Conectar
The role of the interprofessional evidence-based practice (EBP) mentor is critical to integrate best practices into healthcare and academic environments to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients, families, providers, students, and faculty. This study aimed to validate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes/beliefs (KSAs) needed for the EBP mentor. This role delineation study (RDS) assessed knowledge about the EBP mentor role and tasks as related to the steps and competencies of EBP.
Interprofessional EBP experts participated in an advisory panel. Focus groups were conducted with the advisory panel members to identify the KSAs needed for expert EBP mentors. The steps of EBP were broken into 11 domains to align with the processes and strategies needed for EBP methodology. The focus group data were analyzed to identify the KSAs for each domain. A role delineation survey was developed. Interprofessional experts were invited to complete the survey to validate the KSAs needed for the EBP mentor role. The online survey included demographic information and 11 sections that aligned with the steps of EBP and the 107 KSA items needing to be validated.
A total of 251 interprofessional EBP experts completed the survey (232 nurses, 19 interprofessionals). Healthcare providers comprised 82.5% of the sample, academic/researchers 15.5%, and “worked in both settings” 2%. The results reported strong inter-rater reliability (ranging from 0.836 to 0.955) and strong validity for each of the 11 domains and KSAs.
Findings from this study support the EBP mentor role and will guide interprofessional EBP education and EBP mentor positions in healthcare systems. The study showed that the tasks of the EBP mentor were consistent across settings, educational degrees, and professional roles. Validity for the tasks/role for an interprofessional Evidence-based Practice Certification was clear and outlined expectations for the EBP mentor role.
Nurses' burnout, work instability (WI), and job satisfaction (JS) in their practice environment (PE) are well established in the literature. However, perinatal missed care (PMC), a subset of missed nursing care, remains underreported among maternity nurses.
To examine the mediating role of PE and burnout in the associations of WI, JS, and PMC among maternity nurses.
A cross-sectional and correlational study employed consecutive sampling to recruit maternity nurses (n = 312) from five hospitals in Saudi Arabia (three government and two private hospitals in Hail and Makkah regions, respectively). Maternity staff nurses, regardless of their sex, years of professional nursing experience, or nationality, who met inclusion criteria were included in this study. Data was collected from July to September 2024 using four standardized self-report scales. Structural equation modeling was utilized for statistical analyses.
Maternity nurses' WI negatively influenced PE (β = −0.23, p = 0.014), while positively affected PMC (β = 0.15, p = 0.031). The PE positively affected JS (β = 0.24, p = 0.034) but had a negative effect on burnout (β = −0.24, p = 0.007) and PMC (β = −0.21, p = 0.038). Burnout negatively affected JS (β = −0.25, p = 0.028), while positively associated with PMC (β = 0.20, p = 0.022). PE mediated the associations between WI and burnout (β = 0.05, p = 0.019), JS (β = −0.07, p = 0.020), and PMC (β = −0.06, p = 0.008). Meanwhile, burnout mediated between PE and JS (β = 0.05, p = 0.030) and PMC (β = −0.04, p = 0.023).
Understanding the relationships among maternity nurses' burnout, JS, PE, and PMC is key to improving the quality of perinatal care and ensuring the patients' well-being. By focusing on strategies to enhance the PE (e.g., adequate staffing and resources, improved nurse–patient ratio), reduce burnout (e.g., meditation and mindfulness programs, coping intervention programs), and improve JS (e.g., work schedule flexibility, facilitate work-life balance, staff professional development), healthcare organizations can mitigate the occurrence of PMC.
The research-to-practice gap often occurs when evidence-based practice (EBP) is inadequately implemented into clinical practice. Nurses are critical to bridging the gap in EBP implementation (EBPI) and identifying effective strategies to promote its use in practice; however, they need a supportive work environment to develop the necessary research capacity/culture (RCC).
The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between nurses' perceptions of individual RCC and EBPI, team RCC and EBPI, and health care organization RCC and EBPI, adjusting for educational background, health care organization setting, and health care organization type.
Survey data were collected from 175 nurses across the United States using a prospective cross-sectional study design. The Research Capacity in Context (RCC) tool and EBPI scale were used to measure nurses' perception of RCC and nurses' EBPI, respectively. Simple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between organizational, team, and individual RCC and EBPI. Multiple linear regression was used to adjust for pertinent participant demographics.
The results of this study indicated that organization (R 2 = 0.033, p = 0.016), team (R 2 = 0.064, p < 0.001), and individual (R 2 = 0.155, p < 0.001) RCC were significantly associated with nurse EBPI. Moreover, findings remained significant after adjusting for educational background, health care organization setting, and type. The regression model suggested that education significantly predicted EBPI (R 2 = 0.142, p < 0.001).
These results emphasize the importance of building RCC in health care organizations, as it can be an effective strategy to increase nurses' EBPI, which has been shown to impact patient outcomes directly. Future research should identify strategies to assist organizations and leadership in building RCC among nurses.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for improving the quality of care and health outcomes in healthcare organizations. This study aimed to analyze the association between the nursing work environment and EBP elements, including attitude, training, implementation and quality of care.
A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted with 1022 registered nurses from 57 primary care centers and four public hospitals in northern Spain. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) was used to assess the nursing work environment. Data collection also included the Health Sciences Evidence-Based Practice (HS-EBP) questionnaire to evaluate attitudes toward EBP, and self-reported measures of EBP training, EBP implementation, and overall quality of care. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association between the nursing work environment and EBP elements were calculated using logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic and occupational characteristics.
Compared to nurses who reported working in unfavorable environments (n = 220; 21.5%), those working in favorable environments (n = 437; 42.8%) exhibited a positive attitude toward EBP (OR = 2.89; 95% CI [2.00, 4.18]), EBP implementation (OR = 2.30; 95% CI [1.52, 3.39]) and higher quality of care (OR = 2.35; 95% CI [1.61, 3.44]). Using a composite measure that considered all EBP elements, favorable environments were associated with overall EBP engagement (OR = 3.47; 95% CI [2.38, 5.07]). The most influential environmental dimensions were adequate staffing and strong nursing foundations.
A favorable nursing work environment was strongly associated with a positive attitude toward EBP, the implementation of EBP, and a commitment to providing high-quality care. Key strategies to promote EBP should involve healthcare and academic institutions working together to establish a healthy work environment with appropriate staffing and care foundations rooted in nursing theory.
Hematological cancers impair patients' quality of life (QoL) due to prolonged and complex treatments. Digital empowerment programs enhance patient engagement by supporting symptom management and psychosocial well-being.
This study was conducted to examine the effects of patient-centered digital empowerment programs on hematological cancer care.
As part of this study, a comprehensive search was conducted in nine databases and the gray literature in March 2025. The screening included randomized controlled trials without any time restrictions. This study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used in the meta-analysis. Cochran's Q chi-square test and I 2 statistic were applied to assess heterogeneity. Data analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) 3 software.
A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Patient-centered digital empowerment programs were found to have moderate and positive effects on depression (Hedges' g = 0.27, p < 0.001), distress (Hedges' g = 0.28, p < 0.001), self-efficacy, and QoL (Hedges' g = 0.22, p < 0.001). There was no significant effect on fatigue levels in patients with hematological cancers (p = 0.27), suggesting that digital empowerment programs may not be effective in managing fatigue. The results of the sensitivity analysis support the robustness and reliability of the study findings.
Digital empowerment programs may serve as a moderately effective tool in improving depression, distress, self-efficacy, and QoL among patients with hematological cancers. However, they exhibit limited effects on physical symptoms, particularly in fatigue management. Therefore, more comprehensive and multidisciplinary interventions are needed to address the management of physical symptoms effectively. Patient-centered digital empowerment programs enable early intervention by assisting healthcare professionals in symptom tracking. Digital solutions enhance care processes by improving patient education, psychosocial support, and self-management skills.
The interaction between dementia and changes in health status accelerates the progression of dementia and health deterioration. Although health indicators exist for older adults, comprehensive ones for dementia are lacking.
To (1) establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia, (2) develop an integrated health assessment toolkit for older adults with dementia, and (3) test the feasibility and applicability of the integrated health assessment toolkit.
This study involved two phases. In the first phase, using the Delphi method, opinions from 10 experts were synthesized to establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia. In the second phase, with a descriptive research approach, an integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, evaluated by 10 daycare case managers for feasibility, and then pilot tested with 50 older adults with dementia across three daycare centers.
The core health indicators for older adults with dementia covered 18 indicators in five domains: (1) cognitive and behavioral impairment, (2) sensory and perceptual impairment, (3) disease and dysfunction, (4) functional fitness deterioration, and (5) social isolation. After two rounds of assessments, experts rated the criteria's importance and clarity at 0.94 and 0.89 on the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA), respectively. In the second phase, the integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, which integrated five observational assessment scales and six physical function measures. The average applicability scores ranged from 7.80 to 9.90 out of 10. In the pilot test, the assessment process proceeded smoothly without any adverse events. However, 10 participants did not comply with wearing the actigraphy device.
The core health indicators and the corresponding health assessment toolkit are feasible to assess the health of older adults with dementia that could provide valuable insights and guide future interventions to enhance their well-being.
Integrating evidence-based interventions in services by midwives and public health nurses (PHNs) has the potential to improve public health. Attitudes and individual readiness to change can influence the implementation of evidence-based interventions, but there is limited research in community nursing and maternity and child health care services (MCHCs).
To examine attitudes toward evidence-based practice and readiness to change in midwives and PHNs in MCHCs before implementing the “Mamma Mia” intervention (an evidence-based intervention to improve maternal mental health).
A survey-based, multisite cross-sectional study following the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline. Data were collected from 190 midwives and PHNs from 42 MCHCs across 33 municipalities in Norway (2021–2022). Six subscales of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice, and the Brief Individual Readiness for Change Scale (BIRCS) measured individual readiness. Descriptive and inferential statistics using frequency tables, Pearson correlation coefficient, and linear regression were used for data analysis. Open-ended responses were analyzed using content analysis.
Sixty-five midwives and 125 PHNs completed the baseline survey (mean age 46.8, all female). Mean EBPAS subscales scores were 2.99 to 3.58 (SD = 0.46–0.77) mean BIRCS score was 3.16 (SD = 0.49) (possible range 0–4). Scores were slightly higher than typically reported in clinical settings, with no significant differences based on demographics (all p-values ≥ 0.166). EBPAS subscores and the BIRCS score showed a moderate positive association. The most frequently reported positive factors influencing readiness were “enhanced care and positive gain” (42.6%), “organizational support” (26.3%), and “receiving training and implementation support” (23.2%). Negative factors included “time constraints and workload” (58.4%), and “research participation and implementation demands” (27.9%).
Midwives and PHNs showed positive attitudes toward EBP and a high degree of individual readiness. Our findings align with previous research highlighting barriers such as time constraints and workload, offering insights to inform strategies for more effective EBP adoption and implementation. These results can guide nurse managers, administrators, policymakers, professional associations, implementers, and intervention developers in enhancing EBP integration into practice.
Nursing well-being is foundational to the specialties workforce and broader healthcare industry worldwide. Despite frequent reports and descriptions of activities that support nurses' well-being, most reports describe singular activities and programs that lack science-based structures contextualized within academic healthcare systems (AHS) with validated impact.
To evaluate and synthesize the existing national and international literature on nurse well-being initiatives offered in AHS.
Over 18 months, an 8-member interprofessional team conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Five databases were searched, and results were screened in a multistep process by researcher pairs. Discrepancies were resolved by a third team member's review. Citations were reviewed uniquely three times to ensure methodological rigor. A final set of 54 articles was extracted for key data elements pertinent to the research question describing setting, population, study design, intervention, and other subsidiary fields. Reviewers additionally analyzed publication quality indicators and trends for additional implications for research and practice.
Among the 54 eligible articles, 72% were research and 28% were evidence-based practice, quality improvement, or doctoral dissertations. The concepts studied were psychosocial (e.g., resiliency) and physical (e.g., sleep). The number of instruments used per study ranged from 1 to 11. Thirty percent of studies utilized a framework from various disciplines that included nursing, social and behavioral sciences, and safety science principles. Nurses were included as authors 67% of the time, and 35% received funding from either the public or private sector.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) should be implemented in clinical settings and practiced by registered nurses as it improves healthcare quality, safety, costs, and patient outcomes. For this to occur, nurses need to be skilled and acculturated. An EBP culture needs to be developed and sustained, both in initial academic programs and in clinical settings. Implementation models already exist and are being used, but outcomes are not consistently measured.
The aim of this scoping review was to gather and map the use of EBP implementation models as well as their implementation strategies and outcomes.
The methodology for the JBI Scoping Reviews was applied. The databases queried were PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, AMED, BNI, HMIC, PsycInfo. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Any primary study that describes the implementation of EBP in nursing, clinical, or academic settings. Studies using the following EBP implementation models were included: the ARCC Model, ARCC-E Model, IOWA Model, Stetler Model, Johns Hopkins Nursing EBP Model, ACE Star Model as well as PARIHS and i-PARIHS. They must have used Proctor's taxonomy for implementation outcomes as well as described implementation strategies according to the ERIC classification. Data extraction was performed by four independent reviewers in February 2024. There was no language or date limitation. Three independent reviewers performed an initial selection on titles and abstracts. Reading of the full texts was carried out by two independent reviewers using the JBI SUMARI.
A total of 2244 articles were retrieved. After removing duplicates and applying the inclusion criteria, 26 articles were reviewed, and data extracted. The most used implementation model was the PARiHS or i-PARiHS model followed by the IOWA model, the ARCC model combined with the JHNEBP model and the Stetler model. Nearly all studies used the implementation strategy domain “Use evaluative and iterative strategies” of ERIC classification. Overall, the selected studies used between 1 and 2 outcomes from Proctor's eight available.
The underuse of existing taxonomies (Proctor, ERIC) prevents an exhaustive mapping of the use of implementation models. The vocabulary used is too vague, and the implementation strategies are sometimes poorly described. An effort needs to be made to report on all work done to transfer the results to other settings and thus improve health care practices.
A skilled and diverse healthcare workforce is essential in nursing homes, yet recruitment and retention remain a major challenge. Gaining insight into the well-being of different care worker groups and how they perceive their work environment can highlight areas of concern and opportunities for improvement.
To compare the perceived work environment and well-being among different care worker groups in nursing homes.
This descriptive study used cross-sectional survey data from the Flanders Nursing Home (FLANH) project, collected from February–July 2023. A total of 1521 care workers from 25 Flemish nursing homes participated (64.4% response rate), including care assistants (43.7%), registered nurses (20.5%), support staff (15.4%), allied health professionals (14.8%), and team leaders (5.7%). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the percentages of the care worker groups reporting the work environment items and well-being outcomes (job satisfaction, intention to leave, burnout). Post hoc analyses were conducted to identify which groups contributed to the significant differences observed.
Significant differences among care worker groups were found for almost all work environment items and well-being outcomes. Staffing adequacy was perceived least among care assistants and registered nurses. More registered nurses and team leaders perceived high workload and emotional burden compared to the other groups. Work–life interference and involvement were perceived most among team leaders. A person-centered vision, work autonomy, and salary satisfaction were reported most among allied health professionals and team leaders. Skill use and training opportunities were reported least among support staff. Work-related well-being appeared to be experienced most among allied health professionals and least among care assistants.
These findings highlight key differences in work environment perceptions and well-being among care worker groups, offering valuable insights for tailored initiatives to foster a supportive workplace that benefits the well-being of all types of care workers in nursing homes.
Nurses face heightened risks of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to occupational stressors, with prevalence rates significantly higher than the general population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PTSD symptoms are known to impair various domains of functioning, research examining which specific PTSD symptom clusters most strongly impact nurses' functioning remains limited.
This study examines how individual PTSD symptom clusters relate to overall functioning and distracted practice, a measure of workplace functioning, in nurses with probable PTSD.
We examined relationships between PTSD symptoms and functioning among 420 U.S. nurses recruited through social media platforms in late 2021. Participants completed validated measures assessing PTSD symptom clusters (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), general psychosocial functioning (The Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning), and a proxy measure for workplace functioning (Distracted Practice Scale), with hierarchical regression analyses used to evaluate the unique contributions of PTSD symptom clusters to functional outcomes while controlling for demographic, workplace, and mental health variables.
PTSD symptom clusters accounted for significant additional variance in both general functional impairment (9.5%) and occupational impairment (9.3%), beyond demographic, workplace, and other mental health variables. For general psychosocial impairment, PTSD cluster D, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and cluster E, arousal symptoms, were the most impactful, whereas PTSD cluster B, reexperiencing, and cluster D were most strongly associated with workplace functional impairments. Final models revealed that education level predicted general psychosocial impairment while years of nursing experience predicted impairments in workplace functioning.
Nurses with PTSD during the COVID-19 pandemic faced significant impairments in overall and work functioning. Our findings highlight that PTSD symptoms vary in how they impact functioning. Symptom clusters such as negative mood, arousal, and reexperiencing were linked to worsened functioning. Tailored support programs should address specific PTSD symptoms.
A call for action has been issued nationwide to prevent suicide among nurses. An increased understanding of contributing and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation in nurses is needed to implement preventive measures. Factors needing exploration include nurses' burnout, mental well-being, physical health, and workplace characteristics.
This study aimed to determine factors associated with suicidal ideation in 501 moderate-to-high-risk nurses, including their mental health, level of burnout, health-related personal beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and workplace characteristics.
A descriptive, cross-sectional correlational study was conducted on baseline survey data that was completed before the nurses were randomized to one of two interventions as part of their participation in a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a combined mental health screening program and cognitive-behavioral skills building intervention versus a screening program alone. Nurses were recruited from across the United States via email. Only nurses identified with moderate-to-high-risk adverse mental health outcomes, including suicidal ideation, were included. The survey used valid and reliable measures to assess burnout, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress, healthy lifestyle behaviors, health-related personal beliefs, resilience, job satisfaction, self-perceived mattering to the workplace, and intent to leave. Bivariate tests were performed.
Burnout, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress were individually correlated with increased odds of suicidal ideation, as were nurses working 12-h shifts and those who reported an intent to leave their jobs. Protective factors against suicidal ideation included resilience, positive health-related personal beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, job satisfaction, and workplace mattering.
There is an urgent need for policies and implementation of evidence-based interventions to address mental health issues in nurses to ultimately prevent suicide. Burnout should be considered as a possible precursor to serious adverse mental health problems and not just an operational retention issue. Leaders need to invest in resources to enhance nurses' mental health, fix system problems that are at the root cause of burnout, routinely recognize employees for their excellent work, and communicate that they matter. Leaders should listen carefully to their nurses, prioritize their ideas for impactful change, and appreciate those who contribute to improving culture and caring practices.
FreshRSS 