Conectar
Creating a healthy work environment requires balancing organizational goals with ethical responsibilities, where head nurses' ethical leadership can shape staff outcomes by mitigating work–family conflicts and promoting nurses' well-being, retention, and patient safety. This study aims to analyze the mediating role of work–family between head nurses' ethical leadership and nurses' reported errors, turnover intention, and physical and mental health.
Nationwide Multicenter cross-sectional study.
Validated self-report scales were used to assess nurses' perceptions of head nurses' ethical leadership, work–family conflict, error, turnover intention, physical and mental health. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Structural equation modeling examined the relationships among these variables based on Della Bella's and Fiorini's framework.
Data from 409 nurses across seven Italian hospitals was analyzed. The structural equation model showed an excellent fit. Head nurses' Ethical leadership was negatively associated with work–family conflicts, turnover intention, and errors, and positively associated with nurses' health. Work–family conflicts were significantly linked to turnover intention, errors, and nurses' health. Work–family conflicts mediate the relation between ethical leadership and turnover intention, errors, and nurses' health.
Promoting healthy work environments is crucial for nurses', patients', and organizations' well-being. Ethical leadership helps achieve this condition by reducing work–family conflicts, fostering nurses' well-being, decreasing turnover intention, and improving care quality. Disseminating ethical leadership programs and integrating with work–life balance policies can therefore strengthen both staff retention and organizational outcomes.
Ethical leadership can foster patient care, reduce turnover intention and errors, and improve nurses' well-being. Therefore, maintaining employee performance and organizational results requires integrating work–life balance policies with ethical leadership development programs.
The study adhered to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement.
The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8jk37/overview.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Assess US registered nurse genomic competency.
Administered the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS).
GGNPS assesses genomic knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and utilization in nursing practice. Distributed by the American Nurses Association via email and online to US registered nurses. Results are analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared to 2010 data.
1065 registered nurses responded. Most (41%) were Master's prepared, actively seeing patients (51%) and 66% considered it very important to learn more about genomics. Most (55%) reported their genomic knowledge was poor yet 51% reported a patient initiated a genetic discussion with them in the past 3 months. 66% completed all knowledge score items with a median score of 9/12, no change from 2010. Only 26% had heard of the Essential Competencies. Most reported no genomic curricular content (64%); had not attended a genomic course since licensure (64%); intended to learn more about genomics (70%); and would attend a course on their own time (79%).
Nurses felt genomics was important but have capacity deficits. Despite genomic discoveries and evidence-based practice guidelines that impact healthcare quality and safety, 20 years after the Genomic Competencies were established (2005) nursing genomic practice capacity remains low.
Genomics is critical to the safe, quality nursing practice regardless of the level of academic training, clinical role, or specialty.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based nursing care. However, the quality of reporting and adherence to methodological standards in Latin American nursing journals remains unclear. This study evaluates the characteristics, reporting quality, and potential risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals.
To assess the reporting compliance and risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals.
Meta-research study.
A comprehensive handsearch of 29 Latin American nursing journals was performed covering publications from 2000 to 2024. Identified RCTs were assessed for adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines and evaluated for risk of bias. Outcomes were classified using the COMET taxonomy. A descriptive analysis was performed.
A total of 6377 references were screened, identifying 34 eligible RCTs, most published after 2018. The median CONSORT compliance was 19 reported items (IQR 16–22). High compliance (> 90%) was observed in abstract reporting items, study objectives, and participant selection criteria. However, critical methodological features such as randomization procedures, blinding, and protocol registration showed low adherence (< 40%). Risk of bias was mostly rated as having “some concerns”, largely due to insufficient reporting. According to the COMET taxonomy, the most frequently reported outcome domains were “Delivery of care” and “Physical functioning”.
Reporting compliance and risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals presents significant gaps, particularly in key methodological domains. These shortcomings hinder transparency, reproducibility, and integration into evidence synthesis. Strengthening editorial policies and enforcing reporting standards could enhance the quality and reliability of published research in Latin American nursing journals.
Incarceration significantly impacts inmates health, particularly marginalized groups like transgender persons, due to systemic oppression and inadequate healthcare. This study aims to understand transgender prisoners' health management experiences.
An interpretative phenomenological approach was used. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with eight transgender inmates in Barcelona, Spain, and analyzed using the seven-step Colaizzi method.
Three primary themes emerged: (1) Navigating Vulnerability in Healthcare Dynamics, which highlighted experiences of stigma and inadequate care; (2) The Quest for Wellbeing Amidst Uncertainty, underscoring concerns regarding treatment continuity; and (3) Negotiating a Landscape of Violence, revealing experiences of harassment and discrimination.
This study highlights the need for culturally competent, person-centered healthcare policies in prisons, particularly for transgender individuals. Addressing the specific health needs of transgender inmates is crucial for enhancing their overall well-being. This emphasizes the importance of systemic reforms to improve care provision for transgender prisoners.
Prison nurses must prioritize person-centered approaches, ensure continuity of gender-affirming treatments, and provide empathetic mental health support to enhance trust and improve the overall well-being of transgender inmates.
Osteoporosis requires long-term self-care engagement, yet little is known about how individuals experience and manage self-care in everyday life. Understanding these experiences is essential to inform tailored nursing interventions. The objective of the study was to explore and describe the experience of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management in people with osteoporosis.
A qualitative descriptive study.
We conducted semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis with a deductive approach based on Riegel's theory of self-care. We reported data in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) checklist.
Participants (1 Male, 19 Females; Aged 55–80) Identified Four Themes of self-care: maintenance (e.g., Medication Adherence, Physical Activity), monitoring (e.g., Symptom Recognition, Test Interpretation), management (e.g., Lifestyle Reflections, Prevention), and general self-care. Key factors included motivation, trust in healthcare professionals, and integration of health behaviors into daily life. Barriers were low self-efficacy, poor symptom recognition, and inconsistent adherence.
Self-care in osteoporosis is a multidimensional and dynamic process influenced by individual beliefs, contextual factors, and support from healthcare professionals. Recognizing the variability in patients' self-care behaviors is essential to develop personalized education and support. Strengthening general health behaviors may enhance disease-specific self-care. This understanding can guide healthcare professionals in designing more effective, tailored care strategies.
With ambient listening systems increasingly adopted in healthcare, analyzing clinician-patient conversations has become essential. The Omaha System is a standardized terminology for documenting patient care, classifying health problems into four domains across 42 problems and 377 signs/symptoms. Manually identifying and mapping these problems is time-consuming and labor-intensive. This study aims to automate health problem identification from clinician-patient conversations using large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
Using the Omaha System framework, we analyzed 5118 utterances from 22 clinician-patient encounters in home healthcare. RAG-enhanced LLMs detected health problems and mapped them to Omaha System terminology. We evaluated different model configurations, including embedding models, context window sizes, parameter settings (top k, top p), and prompting strategies (zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought). Three LLMs—Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-o3-mini—were compared using precision, recall, and F1-score against expert annotations.
The optimal configuration used a 1-utterance context window, top k = 15, top p = 0.6, and few-shot learning with chain-of-thought prompting. GPT-4o-mini achieved the highest F1-score (0.90) for both problem and sign/symptom identification, followed by GPT-o3-mini (0.83/0.82), while Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct performed worst (0.73/0.72).
Using the Omaha System, LLMs with RAG effectively automate health problem identification in clinical conversations. This approach can enhance documentation completeness, reduce documentation burden, and potentially improve patient outcomes through more comprehensive problem identification, translating into tangible improvements in clinical efficiency and care delivery.
Automating health problem identification from clinical conversations can improve documentation accuracy, reduce burden, and ensure alignment with standardized frameworks like the Omaha System, enhancing care quality and continuity in home healthcare.
Older adults may experience a wish to die in the context of deteriorating health, a loss of autonomy, loneliness, or depression. Home care workers may likewise experience burden or symptoms of depression as a result of prolonged contact with this physical and emotional suffering. Training initiatives that can support the well-being of home care workers are therefore important.
To describe the typical profile of older adults who express a wish to die to their home care worker, and to examine whether a psycho-educational intervention for care workers exploring the end-of-life process and self-care strategies had an impact on the older adult's wish to die and on the care worker's perceived burden and depressive symptoms.
Quasi-experimental, longitudinal study involving non-randomized experimental and control groups and follow-up at 3–6 months post-intervention.
At the start of the study, all care workers (n = 126) provided sociodemographic information (age, gender) for themselves and the care recipient, and completed the Karnofsky Performance Status scale and the Assessment of the Frequency and Extent of the Desire to Die (AFEDD) interview to provide a baseline measure of the care recipient's functional status and wish to die. They also completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) as a measure of their own perceived burden and depressive symptoms. The AFEDD, BDI, and ZBI were completed again by care workers at 3 and 6 months post-intervention.
The typical profile of care recipients was a woman aged 85.5 years who required considerable support and assistance and who had at least occasionally experienced a wish to die, although these thoughts were not always verbalized. Scores on the AFEDD remained relatively stable over the follow-up period in both the control and experimental groups. There was no significant association between the older adult's wish to die and depressive symptoms in the care worker across the study period. However, a positive and significant correlation between a wish to die in the older adult and perceived burden in the care worker was observed at 6 months post-intervention in both the total sample (p = 0.032) and among controls (p = 0.028). By contrast, this significant association was not found for care workers in the experimental group (p = 0.376), suggesting that the psycho-educational intervention may have had a protective effect.
Although further studies are needed to corroborate and extend these findings, the results suggest that psycho-educational interventions aimed at increasing home care workers' understanding of the end-of-life process and which introduce them to self-care strategies may help to reduce their perceived burden when the older person for whom they are caring expresses a wish to die.
Home care workers may find it challenging to care for an older adult who expresses a wish to die. Psycho-educational interventions that enhance care workers' understanding of the end-of-life process and teach them self-care strategies could help to support their well-being and their ability to provide adequate care.
The way communication is conducted directly influences the professional–patient relationship, how patients cope with their diagnosis, and their sense of hope throughout treatment. This study aims to map the literature on strategies that healthcare professionals can use to promote hope in communication with pediatric patients and their families in the context of chronic illness. Based on this objective, the study highlights an algorithm to assist healthcare professionals in instilling hope in this population through communication.
Scoping review.
This systematized review was conducted using the databases PubMed, LILACS, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus, employing the PCC framework and the Boolean operators AND and OR. The time frame was limited to the last 20 years (2004–2024). A total of 734 studies were identified across the databases, with an additional four retrieved through manual citation searches, resulting in 19 articles included in the final sample.
The findings highlight three key pillars for promoting hope in communication: (1) careful preparation for information delivery, which involves identifying the diverse needs of families and creating a physically comfortable and emotionally supportive environment; (2) providing information and emphasizing how it is presented—considering content, clarity, honesty, empathy, and adaptation to the recipient's specific needs; and (3) follow-up after information delivery, ensuring emotional support and active, skilled listening.
Interpersonal communication between the healthcare professional, the patient, and the family was mainly focused on the transmission of information about the disease and treatment in a clear and empathetic manner, considering who is receiving the information and how the information is interpreted.
This review provides guidance for healthcare professionals in implementing communication strategies that foster hope in the context of pediatric chronic illness. Additionally, this guide may serve as a model for training students and healthcare professionals. Further research is needed to implement and explore additional effective communication strategies for this population across diverse cultural settings.
Despite evidence supporting nurse-led digitalized diabetes interventions, gaps persist in understanding their specific impact on community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Prior reviews lacked a quantitative synthesis of these interventions' effects on outcomes like self-care, HbA1c, and quality of life (QoL), limiting their applicability to clinical practice. This study aimed to systematically evaluate and quantify the effectiveness of nurse-led digitalized diabetes management programmes for community-dwelling adults with T2DM.
We searched six databases to identify relevant articles from their inception to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials that evaluate the effects of nurse-led digitalized diabetes management programs for community-dwelling patients with T2DM were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.0 was used to appraise the included studies. The pairwise meta-analysis was performed through the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0.
Eleven RCTs were included, encompassing 2943 participants from various regions. Nurse-led digitalized programs significantly improved self-care behaviors (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.81), and QoL (SMD = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.94). The interventions also demonstrated a clinically meaningful reduction in HbA1c levels (MD = -0.25%; 95% CI: −0.43 to −0.06), highlighting their potential in improving glycaemic control. Heterogeneity across studies was substantial for self-care but moderate for HbA1c and QoL.
Nurse-led digitalised diabetes management programmes effectively enhance self-care behavior, reduce HbA1c levels, and improve QoL among community-dwelling patients with T2DM. These findings underscore the potential of digitalised interventions as scalable and accessible alternatives to traditional diabetes management, particularly in non-institutionalized settings.
Nurse-led digitalised diabetes management programmes can empower community-dwelling patients with T2DM to achieve better health outcomes by enhancing self-care and glycaemic control while improving QoL. Their integration into routine clinical practice could address barriers to care, optimize diabetes management, and reduce the long-term burden of the disease.
The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42024594874
Approximately 25% of the Brazilian population suffers from mental disorders, a prevalence exacerbated by systemic and cultural factors such as socioeconomic inequalities, underfunded mental health services, regional disparities, and persistent stigma. These conditions significantly impact hospital care. Nurses, due to their direct contact with these patients, face challenges ranging from managing physical conditions to handling verbal aggression and psychiatric crises. This study aimed to assess the scientific evidence regarding nursing care for hospitalized patients with psychiatric disorders.
A systematic review with a mixed-methods approach was conducted, registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42022359288) and guided by PRISMA standards. Databases, such as MEDLINE, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and BDEnf, were searched using keywords like “Mental disorder,” “Psychiatric health,” “Nursing care,” and “Hospital.” Methodological quality was assessed using JBI and SQUIRE tools. The integration of quantitative and qualitative components occurred through meta-aggregation of qualitative data and frequency-based coding of quantitative themes, allowing thematic convergence across study designs.
Six studies were included. Meta-aggregation revealed frequent terms, such as “Nurse,” “Emergency,” “Screening,” “Patient,” and “Care.” Similarity analysis linked “Nurse” with “perception” and “experience” and “Emergency” with “Screening” and “Mental health,” highlighting the importance of experience and training. Five categories emerged: (1) professional experience (19.05%, showing skill gaps despite experience); (2) caring process (19.05%, stressing efficient screening); (3) barriers and challenges (19.05%, revealing difficulty with comorbidities); (4) training process (19.05%, identifying training deficiencies); and (5) therapeutic interventions (23.81%, discussing restraint use). These percentages refer to the proportional frequency of themes identified across the total number of studies analyzed. For thematic classification, only statistically significant chi-square values (p < 0.05) were considered in the grouping of content.
Nursing care for psychiatric patients in hospitals faces challenges like insufficient training and difficulty managing psychiatric comorbidities. Recommendations include incorporating structured mental health content into nursing curricula and hospital-based continuing education programs. These strategies may guide future healthcare policies in Brazil by improving patient safety, reducing hospital readmissions, and promoting more humane, evidence-based therapeutic interventions.
The findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted education and training to improve nursing care for psychiatric patients in hospital settings.
Amid a global nurse staffing crisis, in 2019 Scotland legislated the Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act to address health care workforce challenges. Instead of requiring patient-to-nurse ratios as legislated elsewhere, this act requires staffing decisions according to guiding principles, duties, and a common staffing method. Measuring variation in hospitals' adherence to the act's provisions at baseline is important for policymakers to evaluate fulfillment of the act's requirements and goals. Results will inform policymakers about which provisions are achieved at baseline and which require support for employers to achieve. The purpose of the study was to establish the baseline of nurse staffing standards in Scotland at April 2024 implementation of the Act. Nurse reports of quality, safety, and their intent to leave were measured to complement assessment of the implementation status.
A cross-sectional study design was used. A convenience sample of registered nurses and nursing support workers was recruited through professional organizations and trade unions. Nurses were invited to complete an online survey between May 1 and July 31, 2024. The survey content included demographic and professional characteristics, international nursing metrics, the Act's provisions, and job intentions. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe the sample, act's provisions, and nurses' job intentions.
The sample comprised 1870 nurses, of whom 93% were registered nurses, from all regions with characteristics reflecting the Scottish nursing workforce. Regarding the act's provisions, 9% reported that nursing staffing is appropriate to provide safe, high-quality care every shift. Similarly, few nurses reported that the quality of care was excellent (17%) or graded safety an A (10%). Most nurses disagreed that current staffing levels met the eight guiding principles. Most nurses reported that the common staffing method and duties regarding real-time staffing decisions were followed at best occasionally. Nearly half of nurses (45%) intend to stay in their current job over the next year. Among those intending to leave their current job, about half plan to leave the profession through retirement or another unspecified job change. The other half plan to seek another similar nursing job or promotion.
Few nurses report that the act's overarching goal is being met at the point of implementation. Although most nurses see nursing as a long-term career, workforce disruption is anticipated through routine turnover, promotion, or retirement, requiring workforce retention policies. Whether the act's complex provisions can be achieved and its goals fulfilled may not reverse the trend of exiting nurses. The complexity of the approach will be a challenge to achieving the objective of safe staffing. Therefore, this approach to achieving safe staffing may be too complex to be recommended widely. These remain urgent questions for Scottish policymakers, nurse leaders, and researchers.
FreshRSS 