Conectar
To systematically summarise evidence related to the use of non-sterile gloves when preparing and administering intravenous antimicrobials.
Scoping review.
A rigorous scoping review was undertaken following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework and the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review guidelines (2018). Five databases and grey literature were included in the search. Literature published between 2009 and 2024 was included.
Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science) and the grey literature were searched in February 2024.
Three studies were included; however, none directly addressed correct non-sterile glove use during intravenous antimicrobial preparation or administration in clinical practice.
We found no evidence to support the use of non-sterile gloves in intravenous antimicrobial preparation. There is an urgent need for rigorous research to inform the development of clear guidelines on non-sterile glove use to underpin evidence-based decision-making in nursing and other health professional education, improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and promote environmental sustainability in healthcare.
Inappropriate use of non-sterile gloves for preparing and administering intravenous antimicrobials hinders correct hand hygiene practices and increases healthcare-associated infections, healthcare costs and waste.
A critical gap in the existing evidence was a key finding of this review, highlighting the urgency for evidence-based guidelines to improve patient safety outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and promote environmental sustainability in healthcare.
This scoping review adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QY4J2).
Predicting medical/surgical nurses' delivery of patient pressure injury prevention education within 24 h of hospitalisation.
A cross-sectional sub-study drawn from a larger multisite randomised controlled trial.
A consecutive sub-sample of 300 randomly assigned control group participants was recruited from 20 medical and surgical wards at two major hospitals (July 2020 to August 2023) in Queensland, Australia. Semi-structured observations and chart audit data were collected, including patient education, demographic and clinical data. Binary logistic regression identified hospital site, clinical and patient predictors contributing to pressure injury prevention education delivery by nurses.
Seventeen (5.7%) participants received pressure injury prevention education within the first 24 h of admission. Body mass index was an independent predictor, increasing the odds of nurses delivering patient education.
Few episodes of pressure injury prevention education were observed in this study. As a patient's body mass index rises, they are more likely to receive preventative education from nurses soon after admission.
Our findings underscore the need for standardised inclusive protocols and ongoing nurse training to assess and address education needs beyond single risk factors like body mass index. Further research should explore other factors influencing patient education delivery in hospitals.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines. Dr. Brett Dyer, statistician, is part of the author team.
No patient or public contribution.
Nurses confront substantial daily workloads. Coping mechanisms, including resilient behaviours at both individual and team levels, are pivotal in managing these challenges. Factors like work experience can significantly influence individual resilience. Yet, team resilience among nurses remains relatively unexplored.
Our study examined perceptions of both individual and team resilience among Dutch hospital nurses. Furthermore, we investigated the impacts of hospital type, ward type and work experience.
The Employee Resilience Scale was used to evaluate individual resilience and adapted for team contexts to assess team resilience. This study was one of three conducted under a governmental research program aimed at improving patient safety in the Netherlands. A paired t-test and correlation analysis were conducted to compare individual resilience with team resilience. A separate t-test assessed the impact of ward type on perceived individual and team resilience. Finally, post hoc analyses were used to examine the effects of hospital type and work experience.
In total, 344 nurses from 25 different wards of 17 Dutch hospitals completed the survey. In general, nurses indicated to act more resilient on the individual level (mean = 3.77, SD = 0.61) compared to the team level (mean = 3.53, SD = 0.65; t = 7.25, p = 0.00). A correlation was found between perceived individual and team resilience (r = 0.53, p = 0.00). No effects of hospital- and ward type were found on both individual or team resilience. Years of work experience did not affect individual resilience but showed a significant effect on team resilience.
Dutch hospital nurses indicated they often act resilient on both individual and team levels. However, with increasing workloads in healthcare, being able to remain resilient will become increasingly challenging and important. Organisations should therefore support employees to maintain resilience by adapting their work environment to meet more employees' needs.
To conceptualise information distortion in Electronic Health Records (EHRs), with the goal of providing a theoretical foundation for improving documentation practices.
A concept analysis.
Walker and Avant's strategy for concept analysis was used. The defining attributes, antecedents and consequences were identified.
A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus from their inception to December 2024. Studies published in English that addressed information distortion in EHRs were included.
A total of 37 studies were included. The three defining attributes were: real-world health truth, representation of reality and mismatch relationship. Antecedents were divided into five categories: people-related factors, equipment factors, regulatory factors, working environment factors and management factors. The consequences of information distortion in EHRs included threats to patient safety, poor operational performance, eroded trust, compromised research quality and health inequity.
This concept analysis enhances the understanding of information distortion in EHRs and provides a foundation for further empirical validation. The findings may contribute to the development of measurement instruments and strategies to mitigate information distortion in healthcare settings.
By undertaking a concept analysis of information distortion in EHRs, healthcare professionals will be better equipped to recognise and assess this ethical phenomenon, thereby supporting the development of targeted interventions to mitigate potential harms to healthcare practices. In addition, the clarity of this concept could provide a new angle from which to analyse the origins of flawed EHR documentation and its ripple effects across healthcare systems.
No patient or public involvement.
To describe nurses' roles in transitional care planning during intensive care unit (ICU) family meetings for patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV).
A qualitative descriptive study.
Using secondary data from a trial of a decision aid about PMV, transcripts from 19 unstructured ICU family meetings were purposively sampled and analysed using directed content analysis.
Among 76 recorded ICU family meetings where nurses engaged and spoke at length beyond introduction, nurses spoke at length in 19 (25%) of them. These 19 family meetings were analysed in depth. Three themes were identified describing the roles nurses served: (1) Transitional care liaisons (e.g., introducing next levels of care, identifying/engaging family members, providing patient/family education, managing medications, planning for discharge, assessing patient/family needs, coordinating care, setting goals, providing care continuity, offering provider guidance and referring to resources); (2) information and communication facilitators (e.g., moderating family meetings, facilitating family understanding and serving as communication intermediaries) and (3) family support providers (e.g., providing emotional support, describing expectations and advocating for patients/families).
Although nurses play a central role in patient care, they engage in only a minority of ICU family meetings addressing transitional care planning. Increased nursing involvement in these discussions may enhance care coordination and better support families navigating complex care transitions.
Findings suggest that more consistent engagement of nurses in ICU family meetings has the potential to support transitional care planning and family-centred care for patients with PMV and their families.
This work adds to a growing body of knowledge about nurses' role in ICU transitional care planning. These findings provide valuable guidance for future research and development of transitional care standards to guide nurses in ICU transitional care planning.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist (COREQ).
No patient or public contribution.
To evaluate the ‘Countdown to Theatre’ intervention, a co-designed nurse-led approach developed using the COM-B framework to address context-specific barriers and facilitators to preoperative fasting practices.
A prospective mixed-method, pre–post study assessed the intervention's impact on fasting adherence and patient experience.
Participants included children booked for a procedure under general anaesthesia. Adherence was assessed through audited fasting duration, and patient experience was evaluated using caregiver/patient surveys. The intervention was implemented and monitored by nursing staff as a part of a structured quality improvement process. Nurses played a central role in embedding the approach into daily workflows and reinforcing fasting timelines
Over 9 months, 901 observations were undertaken from 774 patients. Fasting duration decreased from 7.6 to 5.7 h (mean difference −1.94; 95% CI −3.04, −0.86). Parent-reported patient experience surveys showed improvement in many areas, including an increase in overall satisfaction (from 44.7% to 68.8%).
The intervention successfully reduced prolonged fasting and improved patient experiences, demonstrating the value of co-designed approaches in addressing evidence–practice gaps in perioperative care.
The principles of co-design, structured implementation and the application of the COM-B framework provide a replicable model for addressing similar challenges in healthcare. The study highlights the pivotal role of nurses in improving perioperative practices, supporting both patient safety and satisfaction. Future research should explore the intervention's applicability across diverse settings and patient populations.
Despite evidence-based guidelines, excessive preoperative fasting remains prevalent in practice. This study demonstrates that a structured, nurse-led intervention can successfully reduce fasting durations and enhance patient experience, reaffirming the nursing profession's capacity to lead meaningful change in perioperative care.
Standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE 2.0).
Patients and caregivers contributed to the co-design of the intervention, ensuring that it addressed practical challenges related to preoperative fasting.
To explore the experiences of nurses transitioning from a clinical ward to a newly established respiratory intermediate care unit (IMCU).
A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted to capture the lived experiences of redeployed nurses. This design was selected to address the research question: What are the initial experiences of nurses transitioning from general ward settings to a newly established IMCU for respiratory patients?
Two focus groups were conducted in June 2024, involving 14 purposefully selected registered nurses. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework, with the study reported in line with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
The analysis revealed two interconnected themes reflecting the complexity of the redeployment experience. The first theme, ‘The introspection of waiting amidst change and readiness’, captures the emotional ambivalence nurses felt, characterised by anticipation, uncertainty and a perceived lack of preparedness. This phase was marked by concerns over clinical competence, fear of errors and the weight of new legal and ethical responsibilities. The second theme, ‘The road to organizational change with both driving forces and obstacles’, highlights nurses' concerns about physician readiness, feeling undervalued and limited involvement in planning. At the same time, nurses emphasised the importance of teamwork, structured preparation, experiential training and having the right equipment.
The study underscores the complexity of role transitions for nurses moving into semi-critical care settings like IMCUs. It reveals the need for targeted support strategies to reduce uncertainty and enhance role readiness.
To improve the redeployment experience and patient outcomes, healthcare organisations should prioritise structured training, tailored preceptorship programmes and inclusive decision-making processes. These measures can strengthen nurses' resilience, support workforce sustainability and ensure the delivery of high-quality, patient-centred care in intermediate care environments.
This study highlights the significant impact of inadequate preparation and communication on redeployed nurses' experiences in respiratory IMCUs, emphasising the need for structured training and supportive team dynamics. These findings can guide healthcare leaders, nurse managers and policymakers in developing evidence-based redeployment strategies that reduce anxiety, strengthen team cohesion and ultimately improve nurse adaptation and patient care in semi-critical settings.
We used the SRQR guidelines for reporting qualitative studies.
No patient or public contribution.
Evaluate the effect of IV line labels on nurses' identification of high-alert medications in a simulated scenario of multiple infusions for critically ill patients.
Randomised crossover simulation experimental study.
A study was conducted on 29 nurses working in intensive care for over 6 months. They were given two critical scenarios in a simulated environment, one with labels and the other without labels, involving multiple intravenous infusions. The nurses had to identify the medications infused into the critical patients' intravenous lines and disconnect a specific line. The data were collected and analysed to evaluate the errors made by the nurses in identifying and disconnecting the medications and the time they spent carrying out the tasks. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyse the variation in outcome before and after the intervention.
Approximately one-third of the study participants incorrectly identified the intravenous lines in both scenarios. There was no significant difference in the average number of errors between the scenarios with and without labels. However, the time taken to perform the tasks in the scenario with labels was 1 min less than in the scenario without labels, suggesting a potential efficiency gain.
The labels on the intravenous lines allowed for quick drug identification and disconnection. The professionals performed similarly in correctly recognising the high-alert medication intravenous lines, in the scenarios with or without labels.
The label can be used as a technology to prevent misidentification of high-alert medications administered to critically ill patients through intravenous lines, thereby enhancing medication safety in healthcare institutions.
No Public Contribution.
To explore frontline decision-making, adaptation, and learning in ambulance care during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.
Descriptive and interpretative qualitative study.
Twenty-eight registered nurses from the Swedish ambulance services described 56 critical incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic through free-text questionnaires. The material was analysed using the Critical Incident Technique and Interpretive Description through the lens of potential for resilient performance.
The findings were synthesized into four themes: ‘Navigating uncharted waters under never-ending pressure’, ‘Balancing on the brink of an abyss’, ‘Sacrificing the few to save the many’ and ‘Bracing for the next wave’. Frontline decision-making during a pandemic contribute to ethical dilemmas while necessitating difficult prioritizations to adapt and respond to limited resources. Learning was manifested through effective information sharing and the identification of successful adaptations as compared to maladaptations.
During pandemics or under other extreme conditions, decisions must be made promptly, even amidst emerging chaos, potentially necessitating the use of untested methods and ad-hoc solutions due to initial lack of knowledge and guidelines. Within ambulance care, dynamic leadership becomes imperative, combining autonomous frontline decision-making with support from management. Strengthening ethical competence and fostering ethical discourse may enhance confidence in decision-making, particularly under ethically challenging circumstances.
Performance under extreme conditions can elevate the risk of suboptimal decision-making and adverse outcomes, with older adults being especially vulnerable. Thus, requiring targeted decision support and interventions. Enhancing patient safety in ambulance care during such conditions demands active participation and governance from management, along with decision support and guidelines. Vertical communication and collaboration between management and frontline professionals are essential to ensure that critical information, guidelines, and resources are effectively disseminated and implemented. Further research is needed into management and leadership in ambulance care, alongside the ethical challenges in frontline decision-making under extreme conditions.
Findings are reported per consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
No Patient or Public Contribution.
This study aims to understand Saudi women's experiences of sexual and relational changes during the menopause transition.
A qualitative, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis study.
Sixteen Saudi women aged 45–57 who had experienced natural menopause transition were purposively selected and interviewed using semi-structured interviews between December 2022 and March 2023. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants were recruited from several sites, including hospitals, gender-segregated schools employing female staff, and social media channels. The data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Three group experiential themes were identified from the data. These included ‘The intimate relationship while going through menopause’, which explores women's experiences of intimate relationships shaped by biological and hormonal changes, cultural and social expectations, and psychological influences; ‘Perceived attractiveness and self-confidence’, which describes how physical signs of ageing impact women's body image and self-confidence; and ‘Managing the sexual changes during the menopause transition’, which highlights varied coping strategies and attitudes toward seeking support for sexual changes during menopause.
Healthcare systems in Saudi Arabia must provide comprehensive menopausal care and train nurses and healthcare providers to consider women's sexual difficulties from a biopsychosocial perspective. Raising Saudi women's awareness of menopausal and sexual issues, as well as mitigating society's stereotypes, is crucial for empowering them to seek help.
Understanding how menopausal women experience sexual and relational changes during their menopause transition is crucial for nurses, as it enables them to provide appropriate care that supports both physical and emotional well-being. As nurses recognise these experiences, they can offer guidance, reduce stigma, and enhance women's quality of life.
The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
No Patient or Public Involvement.
To synthesise the evidence on implementation strategies used to implement transitional care interventions for adult surgical patients.
Scoping review.
Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched in August 2023 and updated June 2025, followed by citation searches. Studies were screened independently by two researchers, and one extracted data, another verified its accuracy. Studies about transitional care interventions for adult surgical patients were coded according to the ‘Five classes of implementation strategies’ and the ‘Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations’ framework, to illuminate the review findings.
Based on 27 studies included in the scoping review, staff education, changes to staffing and electronic systems, and change management techniques were frequently used implementation strategies. Implementation strategies were mostly used with patients undergoing colorectal and cardiac surgery in Asia and the United States. Scale-up strategies and capacity-building initiatives for people in charge of spearheading the change initiatives were less common.
To further the field, future research could focus on capacity-building and scale-up strategies, fidelity reporting, and financial implications of implementation in a wider range of surgical populations and settings. Work is needed to effectively implement surgical transitional care interventions in real-world settings.
Our findings provide strategies for hospital leaders to adopt when implementing transitional care interventions for surgical patients.
Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.
Determined review focus, interpreted findings, and contributed to manuscript.
The Open Science Framework.
To explore women's experience of the period after completion of cancer treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): a descriptive exploratory study.
A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.
Women diagnosed with the rare pregnancy-related cancer GTN who had completed their treatment participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Twenty-two interviews were conducted in June 2024 and digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis used reflective thematic analysis.
Complex responses to treatment completion were revealed, described by some as a ‘double-edged sword’. The end of treatment routine, coupled with recovery from physical effects, left space for the impact of all they had experienced to ‘hit home’. Multiple concerns and losses were described, including issues relating to pregnancy, self-identity, confidence, fear of recurrence, work and relationships. Gaps in immediate post-treatment support services created challenges for recovery.
The study provides valuable insight into the physical, emotional and social impact of GTN experienced by patients following treatment. The findings highlight the importance of continuing support in the immediate post-treatment period. This study has identified ways in which services can be improved, recognising the need for an individual-tailored approach to reflect the complex responses of patients to treatment completion.
The findings reveal that many women begin to process the implications of their diagnosis and treatment following the completion of their treatment. The end of treatment can be a time when support from healthcare staff is reduced due to fewer routine contacts with healthcare staff. However, these findings suggest the need for nurses to ensure services continue to provide support during the post-treatment recovery phase.
The interview schedule was reviewed by women previously treated for GTN.
To explore how critical care nurses access, negotiate and apply knowledge in high-pressure clinical environments, focusing on organisational, cultural and leadership factors influencing evidence-based practice implementation in acute hospital settings.
A focused ethnographic collective case study was conducted across two contrasting critical care units in England.
Methods included non-participant observation (56 sessions), semi-structured interviews (36 participants) and document review. Spradley's Developmental Research Sequence guided data generation and analysis. Data were collected over an eight-month period (February to September 2022).
Five major themes were identified: sources of knowledge and acquisition strategies; institutional and hierarchical influences on knowledge use; role of experiential knowledge and clinical intuition; challenges to evidence-based practice implementation; and strategies for integrating knowledge into practice. Organisational structures, leadership engagement, mentorship and access to updated digital resources were key enablers of evidence-based practice. Barriers included workload pressures, inconsistent guideline dissemination and hierarchical cultures. Adaptive blending of formal evidence, clinical experience and intuition characterised effective knowledge negotiation at the bedside.
Knowledge use in critical care nursing is a dynamic, relational process shaped by leadership, organisational culture and systemic pressures. The availability of evidence alone is insufficient; visible leadership, peer learning, protected educational time and valuing of experiential knowledge are critical to embedding evidence-based practice into routine practice.
Strengthening organisational systems, investing in nurse manager development, expanding simulation-based learning and legitimising experiential knowledge are vital strategies to enhance evidence-based critical care.
This study provides actionable insights for healthcare leaders, educators and policymakers seeking to optimise evidence-based practice adoption in high-acuity clinical environments and improve patient outcomes.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist guided reporting.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination of this research.
Labour companionship is a recommendation by WHO that health authorities enable women to choose a companion during labour to ensure a safe and dignified labour experience for the birthing woman. However, most healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries do not necessarily consider this maternal need, which hampers a positive maternal experience during labour.
This study aims to examine midwives' perception towards the involvement of male partners in labour companionship.
An exploratory phenomenological approach was chosen and semi-structured interviews were used for this study.
The four main themes identified in this study include ‘Understanding of male partners' involvement in labour companionship’, ‘Involvement of midwives in decision-making’, ‘Barriers to male partners' involvement in labour companionship’ and ‘Facilitators of male partners' involvement in labour companionship’.
This study found a lack of understanding among midwives of the significance of male partners' involvement in labour companionship; and the identification of hierarchical and authoritarian leadership as a barrier to midwives' participation in decision-making highlights the need for transformational leadership styles to empower midwives. Overall, the findings of this study can inform maternity care policy as well as resource development, education and professional training in the field of midwifery.
To offer a practical proposal regarding the implications of integrating intersectional theory into nursing practice, drawing from the experiences and narratives of nurses across diverse professional contexts.
Qualitative Grounded theory, following the constructivist approach offered by Kathy Charmaz.
Data collection was conducted between 2022 and 2023 with nursing professionals from Catalonia, Spain. Following Charmaz's approach, thematic analysis was performed after theoretical sampling was saturated through 17 in-depth interviews and 2 focus groups.
A total of 26 individuals participated in the study. The analysis identified five dimensions related to considerations for incorporating intersectionality into nursing practice. These dimensions are presented as a conceptual framework, organised from elements most closely related to reflexivity and professional positionality, to those more distally connected to a critique of the structural system within which nursing activities are situated.
Although the findings reveal widespread agreement regarding the necessity of adopting a new perspective that challenges the dominance of biomedical knowledge and facilitates alternative approaches to the social and health complexities in our environments, there exists divergence in the methods for achieving this paradigm shift. Intersectional theory provides a theoretical framework conducive to this reassessment.
The findings outlined in this study hold significant implications for both professional practice and the structuring of nursing education at the university level. Concerning professional practice, we advocate for a theoretical framework that offers lucidity and precision regarding the strategies and skill sets necessary for the integration of an intersectional perspective into nursing practice. This framework may prove beneficial not only to individual practitioners but also to managerial entities seeking to reshape institutional care paradigms. In terms of nursing education, this research provides a foundation for a critical revaluation of curricular structures and their practical execution.
Since health and illness are influenced by social and cultural factors, nursing theories are evolving to address social determinants of health. Strategies are needed to integrate intersectional theory into nursing practice and education.
Findings underscore the importance of aligning nursing values with principles of equality, respect, and social justice to address social health inequalities effectively.
This study provides insights into the ambivalence surrounding the incorporation of intersectional theory in nursing practice, shedding light on its perceived value and feasibility among practitioners.
A practical framework is developed which emphasises the significance of understanding power dynamics in healthcare settings and their implications for perpetuating or challenging social inequalities in health.
The manuscript is based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
No Patient or Public Contribution.
FreshRSS 